UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant  

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

 

  

Preliminary Proxy Statement

    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

  

Definitive Proxy Statement

  

Definitive Additional Materials

  

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Atmos Energy Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

No fee required.

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.0-11.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:


LOGOLOGO


LOGO

 LOGO

December 20, 201916, 2022

DEAR SHAREHOLDER:

We are pleased to invite you to attend the annual meeting of shareholders on Wednesday, February 5, 2020,8, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. Central Standard Time, atwhich will be conducted virtually via webcast. You will be able to attend the Westin Galleria Dallas, 13340 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, TX 75240.meeting, vote your shares, and submit questions by logging on to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ATO2023.

The annual meeting will include a report on our operations and consideration of the matters set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement. All shareholders of record as of December 13, 2019,12, 2022, are entitled to vote.

Your vote is very important.important. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual meeting in person,or not, please cast your vote over the internet, by telephone or by mailing back a proxy card as soon as possible.

On behalf of your Board of Directors, thank you for your continued support and interest in Atmos Energy Corporation.

 

Sincerely,  
LOGO  LOGO
Kim R. Cocklin  J. Kevin Akers
Executive Chairman of the Board  President and Chief Executive Officer


NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

20202023 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

 

LOGOLOGO

 

         

LOGO      

 

         

LOGO      

 

         

LOGO      

 

Meeting Date:

February 5, 20208, 2023

              

Virtual Meeting Place:
Location:

Westin Galleria DallasWebcast at
www.virtualshareholder

13340 Dallas Parkwaymeeting.com/

Dallas, TX 75240ATO2023

              

Meeting Time:

9:00 a.m. (Central)

              

Record Date:

December 13, 201912, 2022

ANNUAL MEETING BUSINESS

Atmos Energy Corporation’s annual meeting of shareholders will be held February 5, 20208, 2023 to:

 

1.

elect the 1311 directors named in the proxy statement forone-year terms expiring in 2021;2024;

2.

ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (“Ernst & Young” or “E&Y”) to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2020;2023;

3.

approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers of the Company for fiscal 20192022 (“Say-on-Pay”); and

4.

transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

ATTENDING AND VOTING AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

There will be no physical location for the annual meeting. Shareholders may attend, vote, and ask questions at the meeting only by logging in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ATO2023. To participate, you will need your unique control number included on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

VOTING

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT TO US. Shareholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on December 13, 2019,12, 2022, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, our meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, in person, we urge you to vote as soon as possible by one of these methods.

 

LOGO

 

 

LOGO

 

 

LOGO

 

By Internet

www.proxyvote.com

 

By Telephone

1.800.690.6903

 

By Mail

Follow the instructions on your

proxy card or voting instruction form

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held through a broker, bank or other holder of record, you must follow the voting instructions you receive from the holder of record to vote your shares. Shareholders may also vote in person atduring the annual meeting.virtual meeting using the unique control number assigned to him or her. For more information on how to vote your shares, please refer to “Information About the Meeting” beginning on page 61.60.

 

LOGO

Karen E. Hartsfield

Senior Vice President, General Counsel

and Corporate Secretary

December 20, 201916, 2022

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING

OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 5, 2020:8, 2023:

This Proxy Statement, along with the Company’s Annual Report, which includes our Annual

Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019,2022, are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

 



Table of Contents

 

PROXY STATEMENT OVERVIEW  1 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND OTHER BOARD MATTERS  7 

Independence of Directors

  7 

Board Leadership Structure

  7 

Risk Management and Oversight Framework

  8 

Cybersecurity Oversight

9

Corporate Governance Guidelines

  9 

Committees of the Board of Directors

  10 

Board and Committee Meetings in 20192022

  11 

Succession Planning

  11 

Shareholder Engagement

  12 

Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

  12 

Code of Conduct

  12 

Executive and Director Share Ownership
Requirements .

  1213 

Clawback Policy

  13 

Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policy

  13 

Related Party Transactions Review and Approval Policy

  13 

Board Evaluation Process

  15 

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors

  15 

Shareholder Nominees

  15 

Communication with the Board

  1615 
PROPOSAL ONE—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  1716 

Qualifications for Directors

  1716 

Director Nominees’ Skills and Experience

  1817 

Nominees for Director

  1817 
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION  2523 

Annual Compensation

  2523 

Long-Term Compensation

  2523 

Annual Review of Compensation

  2624 

Summary of Cash and Other Compensation

  2625 

Director Deferred Board Fees

  2726 
PROPOSAL TWO—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  2827 

Audit and Related Fees

  2827 

Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policy

  2928 

Audit Committee Report

  2928 
PROPOSAL THREE—APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS  3029 

Background of the Proposal

  3029 

Executive Compensation

  3029 
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  3130 

Executive Summary

  3130 

Fiscal 20192022 Business and Performance Highlights

30

Compensation Highlights

  31 

Compensation Highlights

32

20192022 Actual Results

  3231 

Executive Compensation Program Objectives and Strategy

  3332 

Elements of Executive Compensation

  3534 

Additional Information on Named Executive Officer Compensation

  39 

Competitive Executive Compensation Benchmarking

  4039 

Independent Compensation Consultant

  4140 

Management’s Role in Setting Named Executive Officer Compensation

  41

Limitation on Deductibility of Executive Compensation

42

CEO Transition

4240 
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION  4341 

Summary of Cash and Other Compensation

  4341 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

  4543 

Outstanding Equity Awards

  4644 

Vested Common Stock

  4745 

Retirement Plans

  4845 

Retirement Plans Tables

  4946 

Change in Control Severance Agreements

  5048 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

  5149 
OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION MATTERS  5755 

Human Resources Committee Report

  57

Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

5755 

Compensation Risk Assessment

  5755 

Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio

  5855 
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK  5957 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

  5957 

Security Ownership of Management and Directors, Nominees, & Executive Officers

  6058

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

58 
INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING  6160 

Date, Time, and Location

  6160 

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

  6160 

AdmissionAccess to the Webcast

  6160

Questions

60 

Voting Matters

  6160 

Proxy Solicitation

  6261 

Shareholder Proposals

  6261 

Annual Report

  62 

Other Business

  63
APPENDIX A—RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO GAAPA-162 
 

 

 20202023 Proxy Statement 



PROXY STATEMENT OVERVIEW

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider before casting your vote. Please read this entire proxy statement carefully before voting. This proxy statement is first being made available to our Shareholders on or about December 16, 2022.

20202023 Annual Meeting Information

For additional information about our Annual Meeting, see “Information About the Meeting” on page 61.60.

 

          
LOGOLOGO LOGO      LOGO LOGO
   

Meeting Date:

February 5, 2020 8, 2023

 

Virtual Meeting Place:Location:

Westin Galleria DallasWebcast at www.virtualshareholder

13340 Dallas Parkwaymeeting.com/

Dallas, TX 75240ATO2023

 

Meeting Time:

9:00 a.m. (Central)

 

Record Date:

December 13, 201912, 2022

          
           

Meeting Agenda and Voting Recommendations

The Atmos Energy Corporation Board of Directors asks shareholders to vote on these matters:

 

Items of Business

Items of Business

  Board
Recommendation
  

      Page      

Number 

Items of Business

  

 

Board

Recommendation

  

      Page      

Number

1.

  

 

Election of the 13 directors named as nominees in the proxy statement

  

 

FOR

  

 

17

  

 

Election of the 11 directors named as nominees in the proxy statement

 

  

 

FOR

 

  

 

16

 

2.

  

 

 

Ratification of selection of independent registered public accounting firm

  

 

 

FOR

  

 

 

28

  

Ratification of selection of independent registered public accounting firm

 

  FOR  27

 

3.

  

 

Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers

  

 

FOR

  

 

30

  

Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (“Say-on-Pay”)

 

  

FOR

  29

In addition to the above matters, we will transact any other business that is properly brought before the shareholders at the annual meeting.

 

Advance Voting Methods

 

There will be no physical location for the annual meeting. Shareholders may attend, vote, and ask questions at the meeting only by logging in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ATO2023. To participate, you will need your unique control number included on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. Even if you plan to attend the 20202023 annual meeting of shareholders, in person and you are a shareholder of record, we urge you to vote in advance of the meeting using one of these advance voting methods.

 

       
LOGO LOGO LOGO
  

Via the Internet:

www.proxyvote.com

 

Call Toll-Free:

1.800.690.6903

 

Mail Signed Proxy Card:

Follow the instructions on your proxy

card or voting instruction form

       
        

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held through a broker, bank or other holder of record, you must follow the voting instructions you receive from the holder of record to vote your shares.

 


 20202023 Proxy Statement 1



About Atmos Energy

AnAtmos Energy Corporation, an S&P 500 company headquartered in Dallas, Atmos Energy (the “Company”) servesis the country’s largest natural gas-only distributor. We safely deliver reliable, affordable, efficient and abundant natural gas to more than 3 million distribution customers in over 1,400 communities across eight states and manages proprietary pipeline and storage assets, including one oflocated primarily in the largest intrastate natural gas pipeline systems in Texas.South. As part of our vision to be the safest provider of natural gas services, we are modernizing our business and our infrastructure while continuing to invest in safety, innovation, environmental sustainability and our communities. Atmos Energy manages proprietary pipeline and storage assets, including one of the largest intrastate natural gas pipeline systems in Texas.

 

  

Our Company

     

Our Vision

     

Our Strategy

  
  
  We are the nation’s largest fully regulated, naturalgas-only distributor of safe, clean, efficient and affordable energy.     

Our vision is for Atmos Energy to be thesafest provider of natural gas services. We will be recognized forexceptional customer service, for being agreat employer, and for achievingsuperior financial results.

     

Atmos Energy’s strategy is to:

 

  operate ourbusiness exceptionally well

  invest in ourpeople and ourinfrastructure

  enhance ourculture

  

20192022 Financial Results and Accomplishments

2019 was a strong year forIn fiscal 2022, Atmos Energy.Energy remained resilient as we worked to achieve our vision of being the safest provider of natural gas services. Earnings and earnings per share increased for a 17the 20th consecutive year. In fiscal 2019,2022, we generated net income of $511.4$774.4 million or $4.35$5.60 per diluted share, compared withshare. We recorded net income of $603.1$665.6 million, or $5.43$5.12 per diluted share in the prior year. Adjusted net income for the year ended September 30, 2018, was $444.3 million, or $4.00 per diluted share, after excluding the effects of implementing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) from the prior year.*2021. Capital expenditures for fiscal 20192022 totaled approximately $1.7$2.4 billion, with approximately 87%88% of this amount invested to improve the safety and reliability of our distribution and transmission systems.

In August 2019, consistent with the long-term leadership succession plan conducted by our Board of Directors (the “Board”), we announced that J. Kevin Akers, Executive Vice President, would assume the role of President and Chief Executive Officer, effective October 1, 2019. Mr. Akers and his leadership team are committed to maintaining Atmos Energy’s vision to be the safest provider of natural gas services.

  

DILUTED EARNINGS

PER SHARE*

     DECLARED DIVIDENDS PER SHARE     TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN  
 $4.35    $2.10    23.8% 
  

17th Consecutive Year of

EPS Growth

     Up from $1.94 for FY2018     

3-year cumulative total

shareholder return of 63.3%

  
  

 

DILUTED EARNINGS

PER SHARE

   

 

DECLARED DIVIDENDS PER

SHARE

  
 $5.60   $2.72 
  

20th Consecutive Year of

EPS Growth

   Up from $2.50 for FY2021  

 

811th Year of Organic Growth Strategy

  

Significant Regulatory Developments

 

✓ EPS of $4.35*; 17th$5.60; 20th consecutive year of EPS
 growth

 

✓ FY 20192022 Dividend of $2.10; 8.2%$2.72; 8.8% growth over FY 20182021

 

✓ Capital spending of $1.7$2.4 billion

 

✓ Maintained strong balance sheet; equity capitalization of 59%61% as of September 30, 20192022, excluding incremental Winter Storm Uri financing

  

 

Implemented $117$215.6 million of annualized regulatory outcomes during fiscal 20192022

 

Continued to implement tax reform into customer bills

Texas Railroad Commission issued Financing Order for securitization of gas costs from Winter Storm Uri

 

*

Represents a measure of performance that is calculated and presented other than in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). See Appendix A for an explanation of these non-GAAP measures, a full reconciliation of these non-GAAP results to our GAAP net income and diluted net income per share results, and a brief discussion of why we use these non-GAAP performance measures.

 

2 ATMOS ENERGY 



Total Shareholder Return

We have also continued to deliver positive returns to our shareholders, generating total shareholder returns (stock price appreciation and reinvested dividends) (“TSR”) over the latest one, three and five-year periods, as shown in the following chart:

LOGOLOGOLOGO
  Atmos Energy      Peer Group      S&P 500 Index

The Atmos Energy peer group used in this chart is the same peer group used for executive compensation benchmarking for fiscal 2019, as approved by our Board, and is comprised of the following companies: Alliant Energy Corporation; Ameren Corporation; CenterPoint Energy, Inc.; CMS Energy Corporation; DTE Energy Company; National Fuel Gas Company; NiSource Inc.; ONE Gas, Inc.; Spire, Inc.; WEC Energy Group, Inc.; and Xcel Energy Inc. See “Competitive Executive Compensation Benchmarking,” beginning on page 40 below for further information on these peer group companies.

Corporate Governance Highlights

Our corporate governance policies and practices promote the long-term interests of our shareholders, strengthen the accountability of our Board and management, and help build public trust in the Company. Below is a summary of some of the highlights of our corporate governance framework.

 

BOARD PRACTICES

✓ independent lead director

✓ separation of board chair and CEO

✓ 109 of 1311 director nominees are independent

✓ annual election of all directors

✓ regular executive sessions of independent directors

✓ comprehensive and strategic risk oversight

✓ mandatory retirement age for directors

✓ annual board and committee evaluations

✓ all committees chaired by independent directors

 

SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

✓ robust shareholder engagement

✓ annualsay-on-paySay-on-Pay voting

✓ majority voting for director elections

✓ no poison pill in force

 

    

OTHER GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

✓ executive and director stock ownership guidelines

���clawback policy

✓ prohibition on hedging or pledging stock

 


 20202023 Proxy Statement 3



Director Nominees

We have included summary information about each director nominee in the table below. Each director is elected annually by a majority of votes. See“Nominees for Director” beginning on page 1817 for more information regarding our director nominees.

 

  

 

COMMITTEES

 

  

 

COMMITTEES

 

Name and Primary Occupation

 

    Age    

 

 

 

  Director  

Since

 

 

 Independent 

 

 

    AC    

 

 

    HR    

 

 

    NC    

 

 

    CR    

 

 

    EC    

 

 

    Age    

 

 

  Director  

Since

 

 

  Independent  

 

 

    AC    

 

 

    HR    

 

 

    NC    

 

 

    CR    

 

 

    EC    

 

J. Kevin Akers(a)

President and Chief Executive Officer, Atmos Energy

 

 

56

 

 

2019

             59

 

 2019            

Robert W. Best

Director, Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited

 

 

73

 

 

1997

 

 

       

 

M

  

Kim R. Cocklin(a)

Executive Chairman of Board, Atmos Energy

 

 

68

 

 

2009

            

John C. Ale

Former Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Southwestern Energy Company

 

 

68

 

 

2022

 

 

   

 

M

   

 

M

  

Kim R. Cocklin(a)

Chairman of the Board, Atmos Energy

 

 

71

 

 

2009

            

Kelly H. Compton

Executive Director, Hoglund Foundation

 

 

62

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

M

 

 

M

       

 

65

 

 

2016

 

 

   

 

M

   

 

M

  

Sean Donohue

Chief Executive Officer, DFW International Airport

 

 

58

 

 

2018

 

 

     

 

M

 

 

M

   

 

61

 

 

2018

      

 

M

 

 

M

  

Rafael G. Garza

President and Founder, RGG Capital Partners, LLC

 

 

59

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

M

   

 

M

     

 

62

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

M

   

 

M

    

Richard K. Gordon

General Partner, Juniper Capital LP,

Juniper Energy LP,

Juniper Capital II, and

Juniper Capital III

 

 

70

 

 

2001

 

 

Lead
Director

   

 

M

 

 

M

 

 

C

 

 

C

Robert C. Grable

Founding Partner, Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP

 

 

73

 

 

2009

 

 

 

 

M

   

 

C

   

 

M

Nancy K. Quinn

Director, Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.

 

 

66

 

 

2004

 

 

 

 

M

 

 

C

   

 

M

 

 

M

Richard K. Gordon

General Partner, Juniper Capital LP and

Juniper Energy LP; Senior Advisor,

Juniper Capital II and

Juniper Capital III

 

 

73

 

 

2001

 

 

Lead

Director

   

 

C

   

 

M

 

 

C

Nancy K. Quinn

Independent Energy Consultant

 

 

69

 

 

2004

 

 

 

 

C

   

 

M

   

 

M

Richard A. Sampson

General Partner and Founder, RS Core Capital, LLC

 

 

69

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

C

 

 

M

     

 

M

 

 

72

 

 

2012

 

 

   

 

M

 

 

C

   

 

M

Stephen R. Springer(a)

Director, Atmos Energy

 

 

73

 

 

2005

         

 

M

  

Diana J. Walters

Founder and Managing Member, Amichel, LLC

 

 

56

 

 

2018

 

 

   

 

M

   

 

M

   

 

59

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

M

 

 

M

      

Richard Ware II

Chairman, Amarillo National Bank

 

 

73

 

 

1994

 

 

 

 

M

   

 

M

    

Frank Yoho

Former Executive Vice President and President of Natural Gas, Duke Energy

 

 

63

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

M

     

 

C

 

 

M

AC = Audit    HR = Human Resources    NC = Nominating and Corporate Governance    CR = Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety     EC = Executive

M = Member    C = Chair

 

(a)

The director is not independent and accordingly is not eligible to be a member of any of the committees except the Executive Committee and/or the Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety Committee, pursuant to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.

 

4 ATMOS ENERGY 



Director Nominee Composition

 

GenderRace/Ethnicity
Gender Diversity

LOGO

 

LOGO

Tenure Independence
 
LOGO

LOGOLOGO

 

 LOGOLOGO

Compensation Highlights

Our compensation programs are designed to both attract and retaintop-level executive talent and align the long- and short-term interests of our executives with those of our shareholders. We received more than 95% shareholder support for our“Say-on-Pay”Say-on-Pay vote in 2019,2022, which our Human Resources Committee considers to be among the most important items of feedback about our compensation programs. We recognize and reward our executive officers through compensation arrangements that directly link their pay to the Company’s performance, and we ensure a strong alignment of interests with our shareholders by including a significant amount of equity in the overall mix of pay. Our pay mix includes base salary, an annual incentive cash bonus plan (“Incentive Plan”), and a long-term incentive plan (“LTIP”) under which we grant time-basedtime-lapsed and performance-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”).

 

2023 Proxy Statement5


Fiscal 20192022 Target Compensation Mix

 

LOGOLOGO LOGOLOGO

 


2020 Proxy Statement5



Key Features of Our Executive Compensation Program

 LOGO

Executive officer awards under the Incentive Plan and LTIP are generally capped at 200% of target. These awards are capped at 200% of target.target if the Company’s total shareholder return (“TSR”) for the performance period is negative.

 

 LOGO

Fifty percent of long-term incentive compensation is performance-contingent.

 

 LOGO

We have in place aOur clawback policy that provides for the repayment or forfeiture of all incentive-based compensation in certain circumstances.

 

 LOGO

Executives and directors are subject to stockshare ownership guidelines and retention requirements.

LOGO

Our change in control severance arrangements do not exceed three times the sum of a named executive officer’s base salary and their most recent annual award of incentive compensation.

 

 LOGO

Our change in control severance arrangements are triggered only by an involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of duties.

LOGO

Severance under our change in control severance arrangements does not exceed three times the sum of a named executive officer’s base salary and their most recent annual Incentive Plan payment.

 

 LOGO

We have no employment agreements with our officers.

 

 LOGO

We prohibit hedging and pledging of our securities at any time by any employees andor directors.

 

 LOGO

There is no single trigger immediate vesting of outstanding grants of awards under our LTIP upon a change in control.

 

 LOGO

Our change in control severance arrangements do not contain excise taxgross-up payments.

 

 LOGO

We have no excessive perquisites for executives.

 

 LOGO

We pay dividends on performance-contingent stock awardsperformance-based RSUs when vesting is complete and then only ifto the extent performance targets are met.

 

 

6 ATMOS ENERGY 


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND OTHER BOARD MATTERS

Independence of Directors

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) each require that a majority of the Board be comprised of “independent” directors, as defined from time to time by law, NYSE standards, and any specific requirements established by the Board. A director may be determined to be independent only if the Board has determined that he or she has no material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of the Company. To assist it in making its determination of the independence of each of itsnon-employee members, the Board has adopted its Categorical Standards of Director Independence (“Standards”). The Standards specify the criteria by which the independence of ournon-employee directors will be determined and the types of relationships the Board has determined to be categorically immaterial, including relationships of such directors and their immediate families with respect to past employment or affiliation with the Company, our management or our independent registered public accounting firm. The Standards and our Guidelines are posted on our website at https://www.atmosenergy.com/esg/corporate-governance.company/corporate-responsibility-reports.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”) considers all relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating the independence of directors, including without limitation, written responses to submitted questionnaires completed annually by each of our directors. On the basis of this information, the Nominating Committee advised the full Board of its conclusions regarding director independence. After considering the committee’s recommendation, for fiscal 2022, the Board affirmatively determined that each of the Company’s directors other than Mr. Akers, Mr. Cocklin, and Mr. Springer is independent in accordance with applicable NYSE and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) independence rules and requirements and the standards described above. The Board determined that Mr. Akers is not independent because he is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company; that Mr. Cocklin is not independent because he iswas the Executive Chairman of the Company;Company until December 10, 2020; and that Mr. Springer (who retired from the Board effective November 30, 2021) is not independent because hisson-in-law is a partner with the firm of E&Y, our independent registered public accounting firm. Mr. Springer’sson-in-law is not involved in our audit and is not considered a “covered person” with respect to us, as defined under the SEC’s independence-related rules and regulations for auditors. Thus, this relationship has no effect on E&Y’s independence as our independent registered public accounting firm.

Board Leadership Structure

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Board has the right to exercise its discretion to either separate or combine the offices of the Chairman of the Board and the CEO. This decision is based upon the Board’s determination of what is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, in light of the circumstances and taking into consideration succession planning, skills and experience of the individuals filling those positions and other relevant factors. The current leadership structure is based on the experienced leadership provided by an Executivea Chairman of the Board (currently Mr. Cocklin) and a full-time President and CEO (currently Mr. Akers), with both positions being subject to oversight and review by the Company’s independent directors. The Board recognizes that if the circumstances change in the future, other leadership structures might also be appropriate and it has the discretion to revisit this determination of the Company’s leadership structure.

The Board’s leadership structure is designed so that independent directors exercise oversight of the Company’s management and key issues related to strategy and risk. Only independent directors serve on our Audit Committee, Human Resources Committee (“HR Committee”) and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, (“Nominating Committee”), and all standing Board committees are chaired by independent directors. Additionally, independent directors regularly hold executive sessions of the Board led by the Lead Director (defined below) outside the presence of the Executive Chairman, the President and CEO or any other Company employee, and they generally meet in a private session with the Executive Chairman and the President and CEO at regularly scheduled Board meetings.

 

 20202023 Proxy Statement 7


Each year, the independent directors of the Board select an independent director to serve as a lead director (the “Lead Director”). The Lead Director is expected to consult with the chairs of the appropriate Board committees and solicit their participation. The Lead Director also has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors as well as thenon-management directors; and if requested by major shareholders, will ensure that he or she is available for consultation and direct communication. In 2019,2022, the independent directors of the Board designated Mr. Richard K. Gordon as the Lead Director.

Risk Management and Oversight Framework

The Board is actively involved in the oversight of risks that could affect the Company. This oversight is conducted primarily through committees of the Board pursuant to the charters of each committee, as described in the summaries of each of the committees beginning on page 10. The full Board has retained responsibility for oversight of strategic risks. The Board satisfies this responsibility through reports by each committee chair regarding the committee’s consideration and actions, as well as through regular reports directly from officers responsible for management of particular risks within the Company.

 

8 ATMOS ENERGY 


While the Board and its committees have responsibility for general risk oversight, Company management is charged with managing risk. Through the Company’s Risk Management and Compliance Committee, the Company has a robust strategic planning and enterprise risk management process that facilitates the identification and management of risks. Our enterprise risk management program is supported by regular internal audits and audits by our independent public accounting firm. KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), which serves as the Company’s internal auditor, presents to the Audit Committee at its regularly scheduled quarterly meetings on its internal audit activities, including the audit activities performed the previous quarter, which address the key business risks identified by the Audit Committee, including evaluations and assessments of internal controls and procedures.

 

LOGO

LOGO

Cybersecurity Oversight

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s cybersecurity risks. Our Chief Information Officer provides the Audit Committee periodic cybersecurity updates.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

In accordance with, and pursuant to, the corporate governance standards of the NYSE, the Board has adopted and periodically updates our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which govern the structure and proceedings of the Board and contain the Board’s position on many governance issues. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at https://www.atmosenergy.com/esg/corporate-governance.company/corporate-responsibility-reports.

 

 20202023 Proxy Statement 9


Committees of the Board of Directors

Atmos Energy’s Board committee structure is organized around key strategic issues to facilitate oversight of management. Committee chairs regularly coordinate with one another to ensure appropriate information sharing. To further facilitate information sharing, all committees provide a summary of significant actions to the full Board. As required under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, each standing committee conducts an annual self-assessment and review of its charter.

 

 

AUDIT

COMMITTEE

 

     Richard A. SampsonNancy K. Quinn

(Chair)

     Kelly H. Compton

Rafael G. Garza

     Robert C. GrableDiana J. Walters

     Nancy K. Quinn

     Richard Ware IIFrank Yoho

 

Meetings Held in

Fiscal 2019:2022: 4

  

 

The Audit Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and procedures, reviews the scope and procedures of the internal audit function, appoints our independent registered public accounting firm and is responsible for the oversight of its work and the review of the results of its independent audits. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s cybersecurity risk. The Audit Committee charter is available on our website at https://www.atmosenergy.com/esg/corporate-governance.company/corporate-responsibility-reports.

 

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE and SEC applicable to members of an audit committee.

 

All members arefinancially literate within the meaning of stock exchange listing rules.

 

The Board has determined that the following individuals are each anaudit committee financial expert, as defined by the SEC: Mr. Garza, Ms. Quinn, Mr. Sampson,Ms. Walters and Mr. Ware.Yoho.

  

 

HUMAN

RESOURCES

COMMITTEE

 

     NancyRichard K. QuinnGordon

(Chair)

John C. Ale

Kelly H. Compton

     Richard K. Gordon

Richard A. Sampson

Diana J. Walters

 

Meetings Held in

Fiscal 2019: 42022: 3

  

 

The Human Resources Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding executive compensation policy and strategy, and specific compensation recommendations for the Executive Chairman, the President and CEO, as well as our other officers. In addition, the committee determines, develops and makes recommendations to the Board regarding severance agreements, succession planning and other related matters concerning our Executive Chairman, the President and CEO, as well as other officers. This committee also administers our LTIP and our Incentive Plan.Plan and oversees the Company’s human capital management. The Human Resources Committee charter is available on our website at https://www.atmosenergy.com/esg/corporate-governance.company/corporate-responsibility-reports.

 

The Board has determined that each member of the committee satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE and SEC applicable to members of a compensation committee.

  

 

NOMINATING AND

CORPORATE

GOVERNANCE

COMMITTEE

 

     Robert C. GrableRichard A. Sampson

(Chair)

Sean Donohue

Rafael G. Garza

     RichardNancy K. Gordon

     Richard Ware IIQuinn

 

Meetings Held in

Fiscal 2019:2022: 2

  

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding the nominees for director to be submitted to our shareholders for election at each annual meeting of shareholders, selects candidates for consideration by the full Board to fill any vacancies on the Board which may occur from time to time and oversees all of our corporate governance matters. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter is available on our website at https://www.atmosenergy.com/esg/corporate-governance.company/corporate-responsibility-reports.

 

The Board has determined that each member of the committee satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE and SEC.

 

10 ATMOS ENERGY 


CORPORATE

RESPONSIBILITY,

SUSTAINABILITY,

& SAFETY

COMMITTEE

 

Frank Yoho

(Chair)

John C. Ale

Kelly H. Compton

Sean Donohue

Richard K. Gordon      (Chair)

     Robert W. Best

     Sean Donohue

     Nancy K. Quinn

     Stephen R. Springer

     Diana J. Walters

 

Meetings Held in

Fiscal 2019: 22022: 3

  

 

The Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety Committee oversees matters relating to responsibility, sustainability, health and safety, the Company’s vision, values, culture, and diversity.diversity, stakeholder relations and climate change risk. The Committee also assists management in setting strategy, establishing goals and integrating responsibility and sustainability into strategic and tactical business activities across the Company to create long-term shareholder value. The Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety Committee charter is available on our website at https://www.atmosenergy.com/esg/corporate-governance.company/corporate-responsibility-reports.

  

 

EXECUTIVE

COMMITTEE

 

Richard K. Gordon

(Chair)

     Robert C. Grable

Nancy K. Quinn

Richard A. Sampson

Frank Yoho

 

Meetings Held in

Fiscal 2019:2022: 0

  

 

The Executive Committee has, and may exercise, all of the powers of the Board of Directors during the intervals between the Board’s meetings, subject to certain limitations and restrictions as set forth in the bylaws or as may be established by resolution of the Board from time to time. The Executive Committee charter is available on our website at https://www.atmosenergy.com/esg/corporate-governance.company/corporate-responsibility-reports.

Board and Committee Meetings in 2019    2022

In fiscal 2019, each2022, the Board held 6 meetings. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the total meetings of the Board and the Committees on which he or she served. In addition, we strongly support and encourage each member of our Board to attend our annual meeting of shareholders. All members of the Board attended our annual meeting of shareholders in person on February 6, 2019.9, 2022.

Succession Planning

The Board is actively engaged and involved in succession planning. This includes aplanning, including detailed discussiondiscussions of the Company’s leadership and succession plans with a focus onfor key positions at the senior officer level. As part of these activities, the Board engages in a robust CEO succession planning process, including reviewing development plans for potential CEO candidates and engaging with potential successors at board meetings and in less formal settings to allow directors to personally assess candidates.

Succession planning does not stop with senior officers. We perform succession planning annually throughout the organization to ensure that we are building a strong bench of talent capable of performing at the highest levels. Not only is talent identified, but potential paths of development are discussed to ensure that employees have an opportunity to build their skills and are well-prepared for future roles. The strength of our succession planning process is evident through our long history of promoting our senior leadership from within the organization.

 

 20202023 Proxy Statement 11


Shareholder Engagement

We believe that maintaining an active dialogue with our shareholders is important to our commitment to deliver sustainable, long-term value to our shareholders. We engage with shareholders on a variety of topics throughout the year to ensure we are addressing questions and concerns, to seek input, and to provide perspective on our policies and practices. We also engage with proxy and other advisory firms that represent the interests of various shareholders. Shareholder feedback is regularly reviewed and considered by the Board and is reflected in adjustments or enhancements to our policies and practices. We remain committed to investing time with our shareholders to maintain transparency and to better understand their views on key issues.

 

 

LOGO

Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

Operating our business safely, ethically, and transparently, and meeting our responsibilities to the environment, to our employees, and to the communities in which we operate and live, are among our highest priorities. To learn more about our corporate responsibility and sustainability efforts, see our 20192022 Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Report on our website at https://www.atmosenergy.com/esg/reports.company/corporate-responsibility-reports.

Code of Conduct

The Board has also adopted and periodically updates the Code of Conduct for our directors, officers, and employees. The Code of Conduct provides guidance to the Board and management in areas of ethical business conduct and risk and provides guidance to employees and directors by helping them to recognize and deal with ethical issues including, but not limited to (i) conflicts of interest, (ii) gifts and entertainment, (iii) confidential information, (iv) fair dealing, (v) protection of corporate assets and (vi) compliance with rules and regulations. We have provided to our directors, officers, employees, customers, and any other member of the public a toll-free compliance helpline and website by which they may report on an anonymous basis any suggestions, recommendations, questions, observations of unethical behavior, or any suspected violations of our Code of Conduct. A copy of the Code of Conduct may be found on our website at https://www.atmosenergy.com/esg/corporate-governance.company/corporate-responsibility-reports.

12ATMOS ENERGY


Executive and Director Share Ownership Requirements

We have share ownership guidelines for our named executive officers and directors that require each named executive officer and director to hold a multiple of his or her base salary (or annual retainer) in shares of Company stock. The HR Committee believes that executive share ownership promotes better alignment of the interests of our

12ATMOS ENERGY


named executive officers management team members with those of our shareholders, and it monitors compliance with the ownership guidelines each year. Minimum ownership levels are as follows:

 

Position

  

Holding RequirementMinimum Ownership Level

Executive Chairman of the Board

  5X base salary value

President and CEO

  5X base salary value

Other Named Executive Officers

  3X base salary value

Non-Employee Directors

  5X annual retainer

Ownership Sources Included

   Direct or indirect ownership of commonCompany stock

   Unvested time-lapse RSUs

   Share units held by non-employee directors under our Directors Plan (defined on page 25)23) and the LTIP

 

Clawback Policy

Our Board has adopted an incentive compensation clawback policy to help ensure that incentive compensation is paid based on accurate financial and operating data, and the correct calculation of performance against incentive targets. Our policy addresses recoupment of amounts from performance-based awards paid to employees under the Incentive Plan and LTIP to the extent that they would have been materially less due to inaccurate financial statements, fraud, or intentional, willful or gross misconduct. We intend to adopt a clawback policy consistent with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) Rule 10D-1 after the New York Stock Exchange releases final listing standards in accordance with such rule.

Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policy

Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our directors and employees (including officers) from engaging in transactions that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of Company stock including engaging in short sales or trading in options, puts, calls, or other derivative instruments related to Company stock or debt. The policy also prohibits directors and executive officers from pledging Company stock, borrowing against an account in which our commonCompany stock is held, or trading Company stock on margin.

Related Party Transactions Review and Approval Policy

The Board recognizes that related party transactions can present a heightened risk of potential or actual conflicts of interest and may create the appearance that Company decisions are based on considerations other than the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As a result, the Board prefers to avoid related party transactions, while also recognizing that there are situations where related party transactions may be in the best interests of or may not be inconsistent with the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Board has adopted and periodically reviews written guidelines with respect to related party transactions and has delegated to the Nominating Committee the responsibility to review and, if not adverse to the Company’s best interests, approve, related party transactions.

A Under the guidelines, a related party transaction is any transaction (or series of related transactions) involving the Company and in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000$100,000 and a related person has a direct or indirect material interest. A “related person” is:

 

A director or executive officer of the Company;

 

A shareholder who beneficially owns more than 5% of the Company’s stock or any immediate family member of such shareholder;

 

2023 Proxy Statement13


An immediate family member of any of the Company’s directors or executive officers; or

 

A company or charitable organization or entity in which any of these persons has a role similar to that of an officer or general partner or beneficially owns 10% or more of the entity.

2020 Proxy Statement13


Under the guidelines, all named executive officers, directors and director nominees are required to identify, to the best of their knowledge after reasonable inquiry, business and financial affiliations involving themselves or their immediate family members, which could reasonably be expected to give rise to a related person transaction. Named executiveExecutive officers, directors and director nominees are required to advise the Corporate Secretary promptly of any change in the information provided and are asked periodically to review and reaffirm this information.

In accordance with the guidelines, the Nominating Committee reviews the material facts of all related person transactions and either approves or disapproves of the entry into any such transaction. However, if advance committee approval of a related person transaction is not feasible, then it shall be considered and, if the committee determines it to be appropriate, ratified at the committee’s next regularly scheduled meeting.

The Nominating Committee has considered and adopted standing pre-approvals under the guidelines for limited types of transactions that meet specific criteria. Such pre-approved transactions are limited to:

 

  

certain transactions in the ordinary course of business with an entity for which a related person serves as an employee or director, provided the aggregate amount involved in any such transactions during any particular fiscal year does not exceed the greater of (a) $1 million or (b) two percent (2%) of the entity’s gross revenues for the most recently completed fiscal year;

 

  

certain charitable contributions made to a foundation, university or other charitable organization for which a related person serves as an employee or a director, provided the aggregate amount of contributions during any particular fiscal year does not exceed the greater of (a) $500,000 or (b) two percent (2%) of the charitable organization’s annual receipts for its most recently completed fiscal year;

 

  

employment by the Company of a family member of a namedan executive officer whose compensation will not exceed $120,000 in a fiscal year, provided the named executive officer does not participate in decisions regarding the hiring, performance evaluation or compensation of the family member; and

 

  

payments under the Company’s employee benefit plans and other programs that are available generally to the Company’s employees.

Mr. Cocklin and Mr. Best each have ason-in-lawrelatives employed by the Company in anon-executive officer positionpositions whose total compensation exceeds the SEC’s reporting threshold of $120,000 per fiscal year. Kevin Freel, Mr. Cocklin’s son-in-law, received $147,482$160,795 in total compensation for fiscal 2019.2022. Robert Cook, Mr. Best’s son-in-law, received $279,838$361,249 in total compensation for fiscal 2019.2022.

State Street is a beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the Company’s common stock outstanding as of the record date of December 13, 2019.12, 2022. During fiscal 2019,2022, State Street (i) acted as trustee of several benefits plans and trusts; (ii) provided fiduciary services for a benefits plan; and (iii) provided retiree benefit payment processing services for several benefits plans and trusts, for which the Company paid a total of approximately $200,000$90,000 in fees. For the Atmos Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust (the “Master Trust”), State Street (i) acted as trustee; (ii) provided fiduciary services for a benefitsbenefit plan; (iii) provided retiree benefit processing services for a benefit plan whose assets are held in the Master Trust; and (iv) provided investment management services relating to assets held in the Master Trust. For such services, the Master Trust paid a total of approximately $220,000$370,000 in fees during fiscal 2019.2022. All such services provided to the Company and the Master Trust were made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms as other comparable transactions with third parties.

 

14 ATMOS ENERGY 


Board Evaluation Process

The Board is committed to assessing its own performance as a board in order to identify its strengths as well as areas in which it may improve its performance. The self-evaluation process, which is established by the Nominating Committee, involves the completion of annual written questionnaires of the Board and its committees, review and discussion of the results of the evaluations by both the committee and full board, and consideration of action plans to address any issues.

 

 

LOGO

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors

The Nominating Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. In the event vacancies are anticipated, or arise, the Nominating Committee considers various potential candidates for director, considering the skill areas and characteristics discussed above and qualifications of the individual candidate. The Nominating Committee will consider candidates that come to their attention through current board members, professional search firms, shareholders, or other persons. The Nominating Committee may interview potential candidates to further assess the qualifications possessed by the candidates and their ability to serve as a director. The Committee then determines the best qualified candidates based on the established criteriawill consider and recommends those candidatesmake recommendations to the Board regarding the nominees to be submitted to the Company’s shareholders for election at the nexteach annual meeting of shareholders.and suitable candidates to fill any vacancies occurring on the Board with a view to achieving and maintaining balance and diversity on the Board with respect to race, sex, age, geographical location, knowledge, skills, expertise, business experience, and other appropriate measures.

Shareholder Nominees

If a shareholder wishes to nominate a candidate for election to the Board at the annual meeting, he or she should write to the Corporate Secretary, Atmos Energy Corporation, 1800 Three Lincoln Centre, 5430 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75240, which is our principal executive office, no later than the close of business on January 14, 2020,12, 2023, the 25th day following the day on which notice of the meeting is to be sent, December 20, 2019.16, 2022. Such notice should set forth (i) the name and address of the shareholder who intends to make the nomination and of the person or persons to be nominated; (ii) the class and number of shares of stock held of record, owned beneficially and represented by proxy by such shareholder as of the record date for the meeting (December 13, 2019)12, 2022) and of the date of such notice; (iii) a representation that the shareholder is a record holder of the Company’s stock entitled to vote at the meeting and that the shareholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; (iv) a description of all arrangements or understandings between such shareholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by such shareholder; (v) such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such shareholder as would be required to be disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors pursuant to the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission; and (vi) the consent of each nominee to serve as director of the Company if so elected. The chairman of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure.

2020 Proxy Statement15


Communication with the Board

Communications to the Board, any Board committee, the independent directors, or any individual director (including the Lead Director) may be sent to the Board of Directors, Atmos Energy Corporation, P.O. Box 650205, Dallas, Texas 75265-0205. Communications may also be sent by email toboardofdirectors@atmosenergy.com. If you wish to contact the Lead Director or the independent directors on an anonymous and confidential basis, you may do so by contacting the Company’s Compliance Helpline at 1-866-543-4065 orhttps://www.compliance-helpline.com/welcomeAtmosEnergy.jsp. www.atmosenergy.ethicspoint.com.

 

16 ATMOS ENERGY 2023 Proxy Statement15


PROPOSAL ONE—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board is nominating the 1311 individuals below to continue serving as directors and whosewith one-year terms that will expire in 2021.2024. All nominees were recommended for nomination by the Nominating Committee.TheCommittee.The names, ages, biographical summaries and qualifications of the persons who have been nominated to serve as our directors are set forth under “Nominees for Director,” beginning on page 18.17. Each of the nominees has consented to be a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.

Qualifications for Directors

Nominees for director must possess, at a minimum, the level of education, experience, sophistication and expertise required to perform the duties of a member of the board of directors of a public company of our size and scope. Once a person is nominated, the committee will assess the qualifications of the nominee, including an evaluation of his or her judgment and skills. The Board has adopted guidelines outlining the qualifications sought when consideringnon-employee director nominees, which are discussed in our Corporate Governance Guidelines on our website at https://www.atmosenergy.com/esg/corporate-governance.company/corporate-responsibility-reports.

Based on the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the specific qualifications and skills the Board seeks across its membership to achieve a balance of experiences important to the Company include, but are not limited to, outstanding achievement in personal careers; prior board experience; wisdom, integrity and ability to make independent, analytical inquiries; understanding of our business environment and a willingness to devote adequate time to Board duties. Other required specific qualifications and skills include a basic understanding of principal operational and financial objectives, and plans and strategies of a corporation or organization of our stature; results of operations and financial condition of an organization and of any significant subsidiaries or business segments and a relative understanding of an organization and its business segments in relation to its competitors.

The Board is committed to diversified membership and does not discriminate based on race, color, national origin, gender, religion or disability in selecting nominees. The Board and the Nominating Committee believe it is important that our directors represent diverse viewpoints and backgrounds. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Nominating Committee shall evaluate each director’s continued service on the Board, at least annually, by considering the appropriate skills and characteristics of members of the Board in the context of the then current makeup of the Board. This assessment includesThe Board seeks to maintain balance and diversity on the following factors: diversity (including diversity ofBoard with respect to race, sex, age, geographical location, knowledge, skills, background and experience); age;expertise, business or professional background; financial literacy and expertise; availability and commitment; independenceexperience, and other criteria that the committee or the full Board finds to be relevant.appropriate measures. It is also the practice of the committee to consider these factors when screening and evaluating candidates for nomination to the Board.

 

16ATMOS ENERGY 2020 Proxy Statement17


Director Nominees’ Skills and Experience

 

 

LOGO

  

 

Years  

Serving  

 Independent   Diversity   

 

Public Co  
Leadership  

 

 

Public Co  
BOD  

 

 

Industry  
Experience  

 Safety   

 

Regulatory/  

Policy  

 

 

Strategy/  

M&A  

 

 

Finance/  

Accounting  

 
     

 

J. Kevin Akers

 

 

 

3

 

    l

 

   l

 

 l

 

 l

 

 l

 

 
     

 

John C. Ale

 

 

 

1

 

 l

 

   l

 

   l

 

 l

 

 l

 

 l

 

  

 

l

 

 

 

     

 

Kim R. Cocklin

 

 

 

13

 

    l

 

 l

 

 l

 

 l

 

 l

 

 l

 

 
     

 

Kelly H. Compton

 

 

 

6

 

 l

 

 l

 

           

 

l

 

 

 

     

 

Sean Donohue

 

 

 

4

 

 l

 

       l

 

 l

 

   
     

 

Rafael G. Garza

 

 

 

6

 

 l

 

 l

 

        l

 

  

 

l

 

 

 

     

 

Richard K. Gordon

 

 

 

21

 

 l

 

      l

 

    l

 

  

 

l

 

 

 

     

 

Nancy K. Quinn

 

 

 

18

 

 l

 

 l

 

  l

 

 l

 

    l

 

  

 

l

 

 

 

     

 

Richard A. Sampson

 

 

 

10

 

 l

 

          l

 

  

 

l

 

 

 

     

 

Diana J. Walters

 

 

 

4

 

 l

 

 l

 

 l

 

 l

 

 l

 

    l

 

  

 

l

 

 

 

     

 

Frank Yoho

 

 

 

2

 

 l

 

   l

 

   l

 

 l

 

 l

 

 l

 

  

 

l

 

 

 

     

 

% of Board

   

 

82%

 

 

36%

 

 

45%

 

 

27%

 

 

64%

 

 

45%

 

 

45%

 

 

82%

 

 

 

 

73%

 

 

Nominees for Director

Each of the following current directors has been nominated to serve an additionalone-year term on the Board of Directors with such term expiring in 2021.2024.

 

 

J. Kevin Akers

 

  LOGO

  Director since 2019

 

  Age:5659

 

  

President and Chief Executive Officer since October 1, 2019; formerly Executive Vice President from November 2018 through September 2019; Senior Vice President, Safety and Enterprise Services from January 2017 through November 2018; President of theKentucky/Mid-States Division of the Company from May 2007 through December 2016; and President of the Company’s Mississippi Division from 2002 to 2007

 

Qualifications:

Mr. Akers has more than 3035 years’ experience in the natural gas industry, including 2831 with the Company. Over the course of his career, he has gained extensive management and operational experience. Such experience and management skills, as well as his demonstration of those attributes discussed in the “Qualifications for Directors” section, has led the Board to nominate Mr. Akers to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

 

18 ATMOS ENERGY 2023 Proxy Statement17


 

Robert W. BestJohn C. Ale

 

  LOGOLOGO

  Director since19972022

 

  Age:7368

 

  

Formerly ChairmanFormer Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the Board of AtmosSouthwestern Energy Company from AprilNovember 2013 through September 2017 and Executive Chairman of the Board of Atmos Energy from October 2010 through March 2013to June 2020

 

Board CommitteesCommittees:: Human Resources and Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety

 

Qualifications:Qualifications:

Mr. Best led the senior management teamAle has more than 35 years of Atmos Energy from March 1997 until his retirement as the Executive Chairman in April 2013. Prior to joining Atmos Energy, Mr. Best had an extensive background in the natural gas industry, especially in the interstate pipeline, gas marketing and gas distribution segments of the industry, while serving in leadership roles at Consolidated Natural Gas Company, Transco Energy Company and Texas Gas Transmission Corporation during his almost40-year career. Mr. Best also has outside board experience as a member of the boards of Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Limited and the Gas Technology Institute, with leadership experience as chairman of the boards of Atmos Energy, the American Gas Association, the Southern Gas Association and the Dallas Regional Chamber of Commerce.

Mr. Best’s knowledge and expertise in the energy industry, including serving as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and leadership abilities developed whileCorporate Secretary of Southwestern Energy Company, an independent energy company engaged in natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil exploration, development, production and marketing, from November 2013 to June 2020, and Vice President and General Counsel of Occidental Petroleum Corporation from April 2012 to August 2013. He also served as external counsel to the industry as a partner with Atmos Energy, other energy companiesSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and industry associations,Vinson & Elkins LLP. He served as well asExecutive Director and General Counsel of Azurix Corp., a global water company, from December 1998 to January 2002.

In addition to his demonstrationdisplay of thosethe attributes discussed in the “Qualifications for Directors” section, his substantial experience in the energy sector and knowledge of environmental, social, governance, and cyber security issues relating to the industry, has led the Board to nominate Mr. BestAle to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

 

 

Kim R. Cocklin

 

  LOGO

  Director since2009

 

  Age:6871

 

  

Chairman of the Board since December 10, 2020; formerly Executive Chairman of the Board sincefrom October 1, 2017; formerly2017 to December 2020; Chief Executive Officer of Atmos Energy from October 2015 through September 20172017; and President and Chief Executive Officer of Atmos Energy from October 2010 through September 2015

 

Qualifications:Qualifications:

Mr. Cocklin was appointed Chairman of the Board, effective December 10, 2020. He was previously appointed as Executive Chairman of the Board, effective October 1, 2017, after having served as Chief Executive Officer or President and Chief Executive Officer from October 2010 through September 2017. Mr. Cocklin has served on the Company’s senior management team since June 2006, having served as President and Chief Operating Officer from October 2008 through September 2010, Senior Vice President, Regulated Operations from October 2006 through September 2008 and Senior Vice President from June 2006 through September 2006. Mr. Cocklin has over 35 years of experience in the natural gas industry, most of that serving in senior management positions at Atmos Energy, Piedmont Natural Gas Company and The Williams Companies. Mr. Cocklin has a strong background in the natural gas industry, including interstate pipeline companies, local distribution companies and gas treatment facilities. He also has extensive experience in rates and regulatory matters, business development and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance matters. In addition, Mr. Cocklin has held leadership roles within leading natural gas industry associations, including the Southern Gas Association and the American Gas Association.

 

Due to his professional experience in the energy industry and leadership roles with Atmos Energy, other energy companies and industry associations, as well as possessing those attributes discussed in the Qualifications“Qualifications for DirectorsDirectors” section, the Board has nominated Mr. Cocklin to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

 

18ATMOS ENERGY 2020 Proxy Statement19


 

Kelly H. Compton

 

  LOGO

  Director since2016

 

  Age:6265

 

  

Executive Director of The Hoglund Foundation in Dallas, Texas since 1992

 

Board CommitteesCommittees:: Audit Human Resources and Human ResourcesCorporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety

 

Qualifications:Qualifications:

Ms. Compton has been a philanthropic leader for over 30 years with The Hoglund Foundation, which partners with education and family support agencies in Dallas, Texas. Prior to managing operations for The Hoglund Foundation, Ms. Compton served as Vice President of Commercial Lending for NationsBank Texas and its predecessors for 13 years. Her responsibilities included loan production and administration for large national corporations as well as middle market companies in the Dallas area. Ms. Compton also currently serves on the Board of Trustees for the Southern Methodist University and the Board of Trustees for The Perot Museum of Nature and Science.

 

As a result of Ms. Compton’s leadership abilities and experience in public and private finance, development and strategic matters, in addition to displaying those attributes discussed in the Qualifications“Qualifications for DirectorsDirectors” section, the Board has nominated Ms. Compton to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

 

 

Sean Donohue

 

  LOGO

  Director since2018

 

  Age:5861

 

  

Chief Executive Officer of Dallas Fort Worth International Airport since 2013

 

Board Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance and Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety

 

Qualifications:

In his role as Chief Executive Officer of Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (the “Airport”), Mr. Donohue is responsible for the management, operation and future strategy and development of the Airport. Mr. Donohue joined the Airport following a28-year career in the airline industry. Prior to his arrival at the Airport, Mr. Donohue served for three years as the Chief Operating Officer for Virgin Australia Airlines, where he ledday-to-day operations for Australia’s second largest air carrier. Prior to that, Mr. Donohue served for 25 years with United Airlines in a variety of executive roles that included operations, sales and commercial startups.

 

As a result of Mr. Donohue’s leadership abilities and experience in strategy and development matters, in addition to displaying those attributes discussed in the “Qualifications for Directors” section, the Board has nominated Mr. Donohue to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

 

20 ATMOS ENERGY 2023 Proxy Statement19


 

Rafael G. Garza

 

  LOGO

  Director since2016

 

  Age:5962

 

  

President and Founder of RGG Capital Partners, LLC and Bravo Equity Partners, LP in Ft.Fort Worth, Texas since 2000, andCo-Founder and Founder, Managing Director, and Executive Vice Chairman of Bravo Equity Partners, LPVantage Bank Texas since 2018

 

Board Committees: Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance

 

Qualifications:Qualifications:

Mr. Garza serves as Executive Vice Chairman of VBT Financial Corporation and its subsidiary Vantage Bank Texas, a community bank with $3.4 billion in assets. For RGG Capital Partners, LLC and Bravo Equity Partners, and RGG Capital Partners, LLC,LP, private investment companies, Mr. Garza has been responsible for managing various portfolio companies with a particular focus on the U.S. and Mexico. Prior to working with Bravo Equity Partners,Previously, Mr. Garza held numerous senior leadership positions with E&Y’s Audit and Advisory and Corporate Finance divisions. Due to Mr. Garza’s involvement in private investments, banking, and corporate finance, he has significant experience in audit, complex financial matters, mergers and acquisitions, and financial strategy. Mr. Garza also has served as a leader on the boards of severalnon-profit organizations, includingand currently serves on the boards of Texas Christian University, the Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth and Baylor Scott & White Holdings.

 

Mr. Garza’sin-depth experience with financial management and strategic planning, his leadership abilities and his display of the attributes discussed in the Qualifications“Qualifications for DirectorsDirectors” section have resulted in the Board’s nomination of Mr. Garza to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

 

 

Richard K. Gordon

 

  LOGO

  Director since2001

 

  Age:7073

 

  

General Partner of Juniper Capital LP in Houston, Texas since March 2003; General Partner of Juniper Energy LP in Houston, Texas since August 2006; General PartnerSenior Advisor of Juniper Capital II in Houston, Texas since September 2014;January 2020; and General PartnerSenior Advisor of Juniper Capital III in Houston, Texas since November 2017January 2020

 

Board Committees: Human Resources Nominating and Corporate Governance,(Chair), Executive (Chair), Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety (Chair)

 

Other Public Company Boards: ExoStat Medical, Inc.

 

Qualifications:

For private equity funds Juniper Capital LP, Juniper Energy LP, Juniper Capital II and Juniper Capital III, Mr. Gordon has been responsible for managingoversees various portfolios that collectively include power generation, mineral, oil and gas, natural gas gathering and oilfield services assets. Prior to working with Juniper Capital, Juniper Energy, Juniper Capital II and Juniper Capital III, Mr. Gordon spent 29 years working with such financial services firms as Dillon, Read & Co., The First Boston Corporation and Merrill Lynch & Co. At such firms, Mr. Gordon was responsible for investment banking activities related to energy and power companies, including natural gas distribution companies.

 

Based upon his extensive business experience in investment banking and the energy industry, hisin-depth leadership experience as the Lead Director of the Company and as the former Chair of the HR Committee and as a member of the board of ExoStat Medical, Inc., as well as possessing those attributes discussed in the “Qualifications for Directors” section, the Board has nominated Mr. Gordon to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

 

20ATMOS ENERGY 2020 Proxy Statement21


Robert C. Grable

  LOGO

  Director since2009

  Age:73

Founding Partner, Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP in Fort Worth, Texas since April 1979

Board Committees: Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair), and Executive

Qualifications:

Mr. Grable possesses advanced leadership skills developed as a partner and one of seven founders of Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP, a large regional law firm. Mr. Grable has extensive experience in representing companies in the oil and gas industry, having represented oil and gas producers, pipelines and utilities in transactions, regulatory matters and litigation, for over 40 years. Mr. Grable also has outside board experience as a Trustee of the University of Texas Law School Foundation and as an advisory board member for the local division of a global financial services firm. Mr. Grable is also a member of the McDonald Observatory and Astronomy Board of Visitors at the University of Texas at Austin.

As a result of his extensive legal experience with clients in the energy industry and leadership experience with boards offor-profit andnon-profit organizations, as well as possessing those attributes discussed in the “Qualifications for Directors” section, the Board has nominated Mr. Grable to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

Nancy K. Quinn

 

  LOGO

  Director since2004

 

  Age:6669

 

  

Independent energy consultant since July 1996; currently a director and chair of the audit committee of Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., a New York Stock Exchange company1996

 

Board CommitteesCommittees:: Audit Human Resources (Chair), Nominating and Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety,Governance, and Executive

 

Other Public Company Boards: Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.

Qualifications:Qualifications:

Ms. Quinn provides senior financial and strategic advice, primarily to clients in the energy and natural resources industries. Prior to 2000, Ms. Quinn also held a senior advisory role with the Beacon Group, focusing on energy industry private equity opportunities and merger and acquisition transactions. Ms. Quinn gained extensive experience in independent exploration and production, as well as in diversified natural gas and oilfield service sectors, while holding leadership positions at PaineWebber Incorporated and Kidder, Peabody & Co. Incorporated. Ms. Quinn has extensive corporate governance leadership experience as Chair of the HRAudit Committee as well as the former Lead Director and Chair of the AuditHR Committee of Atmos Energy, and as a member of the board and chair of the audit committee of Helix Energy Solutions Group.Energy. Ms. Quinn was also previously a member of the boards of Helix Energy Solutions Group, Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas Corp. and DeepTech International Inc.

 

The Board has nominated Ms. Quinn, based upon her considerable experience in the natural gas industry, her demonstrated leadership abilities as a board leader in several public companies and her exhibition of those attributes discussed in the Qualifications“Qualifications for DirectorsDirectors” section, to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

 

22ATMOS ENERGY


 

Richard A. Sampson

 

  LOGO

  Director since2012

 

  Age:6972

 

  

General Partner and Founder of RS Core Capital, LLC, a registered investment advisory firm in Denver, Colorado since January 2013; formerly Managing Director and Client Adviser of JPMorgan Chase & Co. in New York, San Francisco and Denver from May 2006 to May 2012.

 

Board Committees: AuditHuman Resources, Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair), Human Resources, and Executive

 

Qualifications:

Mr. Sampson held numerous senior leadership positions with JPMorgan Chase, a global financial services firm, through which he gained extensive knowledge of portfolio management, investment concepts, strategies and analytical methodologies. Mr. Sampson’s experience of over 30 years in investment management has provided him with an understanding of global and domestic macroeconomics and capital market issues, financial markets, securities and a solid understanding of state and federal laws, regulations and policies.

 

In addition to his display of the attributes discussed in the “Qualifications for Directors” section, his substantial experience in investment management, his leadership as Chair of the Nominating Committee and former Chair of the Audit Committee and his knowledge of complex financial transactions, has led the Board to nominate Mr. Sampson to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

 

Stephen R. Springer

  LOGO

  Director since2005

  Age:73

Formerly Senior Vice President and General Manager, Midstream Division, The Williams Companies, Inc.

Board Committees: Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety

Qualifications:

Mr. Springer’s professional career includes 32 years of experience in the regulated and nonregulated energy industry, while holding leadership roles at Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, Transco Energy Company and The Williams Companies. Mr. Springer’s knowledge of the natural gas industry is based on his experience in the natural gas transmission, marketing, supply, transportation, business development, distribution and gathering and processing segments of the industry. Mr. Springer has outside board experience as an honorary director on the Indiana University Foundation Board and formerly on the board of DCP Midstream Partners, LP, a New York Stock Exchange company.

The Board has nominated Mr. Springer to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy in light of his considerable experience in the natural gas industry, his leadership abilities developed while with The Williams Companies and service on the boards of other public companies, andnon-profit institutions, as well as his exhibition of those attributes discussed in the “Qualifications for Directors” section.

 20202023 Proxy Statement 2321


 

Diana J. Walters

 

  LOGO

  Director since2018

 

  Age:56 59

 

  

Founder and Managing Member of Amichel, LLC since 2019

 

Board Committees: Audit and Human Resources and Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety

 

Other Public Company Boards: Alta Mesa Resources, Inc., Platinum Group Metals Ltd., Trilogy Metals, Inc.

 

Qualifications:

Ms. Walters has more than 30 years of experience in the natural resources sector, as an equity investor and investment banker, and in otherleadership roles within the sector. Ms. Walters is the owner and sole manager of Amichel, LLC, a company that provides advisory services in the field of natural resources. She is a Senior Advisor to Independence Point Advisors, a company that provides financial advisory services. She was the founder of 575 Grant, LLC, a natural resources advisory firm, from 2014 to 2019. She served as the President of Liberty Metals & Mining Holdings, LLC managing direct equity investments in the mining sector and as a member of senior management of Liberty Mutual Asset Management from 2010 to 2014. Ms. Walters has extensive investment experience with both debt and equity through various leadershipmanagement roles at Credit Suisse, HSBC and other firms. She also served previously as Chief Financial Officer of Tatham Offshore Inc., an independent oil and gas company. Ms. Walters also served on several other public company with assets in the Gulf of Mexico.boards.

 

As a result of Ms. Walters’ leadership abilities and investments experience, in addition to displaying those attributes discussed in the “Qualifications for Directors” section, the Board has nominated Ms. Walters to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

 

 

Richard Ware IIFrank Yoho

 

  LOGOLOGO

  Director since19942020

 

  Age:73 63

 

  

Chairman of Amarillo National Bank in Amarillo, Texas since May 2014, formerlyFormer Executive Vice President and President of Amarillo National BankNatural Gas of Duke Energy from January 1982 to January 20182016 until September 2019

 

Board Committees: Audit, Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, & Safety (Chair), and Nominating and Corporate GovernanceExecutive

 

Qualifications:

Mr. WareYoho has developed substantial knowledgemore than 35 years of experience in the natural gas industry in a variety of roles that included marketing, business development and gas supply. In his role as Executive Vice President and President of Natural Gas, Mr. Yoho was involved in the strategic planning process for Duke Energy. He was instrumental in the integration of Piedmont Natural Gas into Duke Energy and oversaw operations, commercial, regulatory and community responsibilities for all aspects of the financial services industry during his over45-year career with a nationally recognized banking institution.natural gas business for Duke Energy. Previously, Mr. Ware has a strong background in assessingYoho was Senior Vice President and overseeing complex financial matters, as well as leadership experience in supervising principal financial officers and experienceChief Commercial Officer of Piedmont Natural Gas. He previously served on the audit or finance committeesboards of Atmosthe American Gas Association, Southern Gas Association and Energy Southwest Coca Cola Bottling CompanyProduction and Infrastructure Center (EPIC) at UNC Charlotte and the board of trustees for the Institute of Southern Methodist University.Gas Technology.

 

Due to his valuable insight into financial-related matters gained through his extensive bankingMr. Yoho’s knowledge and expertise in the energy industry experience and demonstrated leadership including in his pastabilities developed at Duke Energy, Piedmont Natural Gas and present directorships,industry associations, as well as his demonstration of those attributes discussed in the Qualifications“Qualifications for DirectorsDirectors” section, the Board has nominated Mr. WareYoho to continue serving as a director of Atmos Energy.

 

 

LOGO  The Board of Directors recommends that our
shareholders voteFOR each of the nominees
named above for election to the Board.

 

 

 

2422 ATMOS ENERGY 


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Annual Compensation

The Board believes that the level ofnon-employee director compensation should be based on Board and committee responsibilities and be competitive with comparable companies. The Board generally targets compensation near the median of our proxy peer group (discussed below). In addition, the Board believes that a significant portion ofnon-employee director compensation should be awarded in the form of equity to align director interests with the long-term interests of shareholders.

In fiscal 2019,2022, our director fees remained unchanged from fiscal 2021 and included the following components:

 

 

Retainer and Fees

  

Annual Board Retainer

 

$100,000

  

Committee Chair Annual Fees

 

$15,000 Audit

  
  

$12,500 Human Resources

  
  

$10,000 Nominating & Corporate Governance

  
  

$10,000 Corporate Responsibility, Sustainability, &and Safety

Chairman of the Board Fees$125,000
  

Lead Director Fee

 

$25,000

  

Annual Grant of Share UnitsUnits/RSUs

 

$150,000

The Company provides ournon-employee directors the option to receive all or part of their cash director retainer and fees (in 10% increments) in Atmos Energy commonCompany stock through the LTIP. The selected commonCompany stock portion of the fee earned in each quarter is issued as soon as possible following the first business day of each quarter. The number of shares issued is equal to the amount of the cash fee that would have been paid to thenon-employee director during a quarter divided by the fair market value (average of the highest and lowest prices as reported on the NYSE Consolidated Tape) on the first business day of such quarter. Only whole numbers of shares of commonCompany stock may be issued. Fractional shares are paid in cash. Two of our directors elected this option during fiscal 2019.2022.

All directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings. A director who is also an officer or employee receives no compensation for his or her service as a director. We provide business travel accident insurance fornon-employee directors and their spouses. The policy provides $100,000 coverage to directors and $50,000 coverage to their spouses per accident while traveling on Company business.

Long-Term Compensation

Eachnon-employee director is also eligible to participate in the Atmos Energy Corporation Equity Incentive and Deferred Compensation Plan forNon-Employee Directors (“Directors Plan”). This plan allows each such director to defer receipt of his or her annual retainer fee or other director fees and to invest such deferred fees in either a cash account or a stock account (in 10% increments). The amount of the fee allocated as a credit to the cash account is converted to a cash balance as of the first business day of each quarter to beand credited with interest at a rate equal to 2.5% plus the annual yield reported on a10-year U.S. Treasury Note for the first business day of January for each plan year. Interest on the accumulated balance of the cash account is credited monthly. The amount of the fee allocated as a credit to the stock account is converted to share units. The fee payable for the quarter is converted to a

2023 Proxy Statement23


number of whole and, if applicable, fractional share units on the first business day of that quarter. Share units are also

2020 Proxy Statement25


credited with dividend equivalents whenever dividends are declared on shares of the Company’s commonCompany stock. Such dividend equivalent credits are converted to whole and, if applicable, fractional share units on the same day on which such dividends are paid. At the time of a participating director’s separation from service, plan benefits paid from the cash account are paid in the form of cash. At this time, plan benefits paid from the stock account are paid in the form of shares of commonCompany stock issued, which are equal into the number toof whole share units incredited to the director’s stock account. Any fractional share units are rounded up to a whole share unit prior to distribution.

Each non-employee director also receives an annual grant based on his or her election of share units or RSUs with a one-year vest period under the LTIP each year he or she serves on the Company’s Board of Directors.Board. The grants generally occur on the 30th day following the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders each year and must be held until the director’s separation from service. Such shareyear. Share units accrue dividend equivalents and are settled in the same manner as share units under the Directors Plan. On November 5, 2019,RSUs earn dividends paid in cash at the Board approved a changetime dividends are paid to the annual grant ofCompany’s shareholders. Unlike the RSUs that may be traded upon vesting if the director chooses, share units for Directors. Beginningmust be held until the director’s separation from service and are settled in January 2020, Directors may elect to receive restricted stock unitsaccordance with a one-year vest period in lieu of share unitsthe terms of the same dollar amount.Directors Plan described above.

Annual Review of Compensation

The Company’snon-employee director compensation program reflects best practices, as follows:

 

  

Retainer-only compensation with no fees for attending meetings, which is an expected part of board service;

 

  

Additional retainers for special roles such as lead director and committee chairs to recognize incremental time and effort involved;

 

  

Equity delivered in the form of full-value shares;stock awards; and

 

  

Director stock ownership requirements of five times the annual cash retainer.

Together with its independent compensation consultant, the HR Committee annually reviews thenon-employee director pay program to ensure it remains competitive.

24ATMOS ENERGY


Summary of Cash and Other Compensation

The following table sets forth all compensation paid to ournon-employee directors for fiscal 2019:2022:

Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2019(a)2022(a)

 

Name

  Fees Earned
or Paid in Cash
($)(b)
  Stock
Awards
($)(c)
  Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(d)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(e)
  

Total  

($)  

  

Robert W. Best

   

 

100,000

   

 

150,000

   

 

—  

   

 

—  

   

 

250,000

  

Kelly H. Compton

   

 

100,000

   

 

150,000

   

 

—  

   

 

—  

   

 

250,000

  

Sean Donohue

   

 

93,750

   

 

150,000

   

 

—  

   

 

—  

   

 

243,750

  

Ruben E. Esquivel(f)

   

 

35,125

   

 

150,000

   

 

9,559

   

 

57,245

   

 

251,929

  

Rafael G. Garza

   

 

100,000

   

 

150,000

   

 

—  

   

 

—  

   

 

250,000

  

Richard K. Gordon

   

 

129,011

   

 

150,000

   

 

—  

   

 

—  

   

 

279,011

  

Robert C. Grable

   

 

110,000

   

 

150,000

   

 

—  

   

 

—  

   

 

260,000

  

Nancy K. Quinn

   

 

112,500

   

 

150,000

   

 

4

   

 

5

   

 

262,509

  

Richard A. Sampson

   

 

115,000

   

 

150,000

   

 

—  

   

 

—  

   

 

265,000

  

Stephen R. Springer

   

 

100,000

   

 

150,000

   

 

—  

   

 

—  

   

 

250,000

  

Diana J. Walters

   

 

93,750

   

 

150,000

   

 

169

   

 

269

   

 

244,188

  

Richard Ware II

   

 

100,000

   

 

150,000

   

 

—  

   

 

—  

   

 

250,000

  

26ATMOS ENERGY


(a)

No stock options were awarded to our directors and nonon-equity incentive plan compensation was earned by our directors in fiscal 2019.

(b)

Non-employee directors may defer all or a part of their annual cash retainer under our Directors Plan. During fiscal 2019, Mr. Esquivel, Ms. Quinn, Mr. Springer, and Ms. Walters elected to defer a portion of their director fees (a total of $106,375), under such plan, which amounts are included in this column and are described in the table below. Deferred amounts are invested, at the election of the participating director, either in a stock account or a cash account. Mr. Grable elected to forego the receipt in cash of a total of 30% of his director fees ($33,000) and instead received shares of our common stock under our LTIP in fiscal 2019, while Mr. Ware elected to receive in lieu of cash a total of 70% of his director fees ($70,000) in common stock under our LTIP. These shares do not contain any restrictions and were awarded on the first trading day of the quarter in which such fees were earned based on the fair market value of our stock on that date. As a result of such elections, a total of 337 shares were issued to Mr. Grable and 717 shares to Mr. Ware on the following dates and at the following fair market values during fiscal 2019: (i) October 1, 2018, at a fair market value of $93.40 per share; (ii) January 2, 2019, at a fair market value of $91.02 per share; (iii) April 1, 2019, at a fair market value of $102.25 per share and (iv) July 1, 2019, at a fair market value of $105.01 per share. Fractional shares were paid in cash subsequent to the end of fiscal 2019.

(c)

The amounts in this column represent the fair market value on the date of grant, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the share units awarded to each of ournon-employee directors (except Mr. Esquivel) under our LTIP for service on the Board in fiscal 2019 on March 8, 2019 at a fair market value of $99.73 per share. As of the last day of fiscal 2019, nonon-employee director held any stock options or unvested stock awards. The amount for Mr. Esquivel was calculated as of the effective date of his retirement, February 6, 2019.

(d)

The amounts in this column represent the amount of above-market interest earned during fiscal 2019 on the accumulated amount of Board fees deferred to cash accounts. Interest considered above-market is the incremental rate of interest earned above 120% of the10-year U.S. Treasury Note rate, which is reset on January 1 each year.

(e)

The amounts in this column represent the market rate of interest accrued during fiscal 2019 on the accumulated amount of board fees deferred to a cash account, including deferrals made to the cash account in fiscal 2019 for Mr. Esquivel, Ms. Quinn, and Ms. Walters. No director received perquisites and other personal benefits with an aggregate value equal to or exceeding $10,000 during fiscal 2019, except for Mr. Esquivel. Mr. Esquivel received perquisites and other benefits relating to retirement gifts and related items in the amount of $42,354 in recognition of his service on the Board of Directors. All such perquisites and other benefits were valued at the aggregate incremental cost to the Company. Mr. Esquivel served as a director during fiscal 2019 until his retirement on February 6, 2019, following our 2019 annual meeting of shareholders.

(f)

Mr. Esquivel elected to receive distributions of cash from his deferred cash account and share units under the LTIP in five annual installments following his retirement. The first installment from his deferred cash account was in the amount of $108,983 and the first installment from his stock account was a total of 6,901 shares issued on February 6, 2019, with a total value of $658,424, based on the fair market value of the shares on that date of $95.41 per share. Mr. Esquivel’s remaining balance of share units has accumulated quarterly dividend equivalents, bringing his aggregate total to 29,551 share units as of September 30, 2019.

Director Deferred Board Fees

The following table sets forth, for each participatingnon-employee director, the amount of director compensation deferred during fiscal 2019 and cumulative deferred compensation as of September 30, 2019:

Director Deferred Board Fees for Fiscal Year 2019

Name

 Board Fees
Deferred
to Stock
Account
($)(a)
 Dividend
Equivalents
Earned on
Stock Account
and
Reinvested
($)(b)
 Cumulative
Board Fees
Deferred to
Stock Account at
September 30
($)
 Board Fees
Deferred to
Cash Account
($)
 Interest
Earned on
Cash Account
($)(c)
 Cumulative
Board Fees
Deferred
to Cash
Account at
September 30
($)
  

Ruben E. Esquivel

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

17,000

  

 

24,450

  

 

449,119

  

Nancy K. Quinn

  

 

40,625

  

 

12,088

  

 

294,586

  

 

—  

  

 

9

  

 

177

  

Stephen R. Springer

  

 

32,500

  

 

370

  

 

32,870

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

Diana J. Walters

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

16,250

  

 

438

  

 

16,688

  

(a)

Ms. Quinn elected to receive 40% of her director fees in deferred stock for fiscal 2019. The $40,625 amount represents 415 share units received in fiscal 2019. Mr. Springer elected to receive 40% of his director fees in deferred stock for fiscal 2019. The $32,500 amount represents 330 share units received in fiscal 2019. Deferrals of amounts in the stock account are treated as though the deferred amounts are invested in our common stock at the fair market value of the shares on the date earned. Shares of our common stock equal to the number of share units in a director’s stock account are issued to such director on the last day of the director’s service.

(b)

Dividend equivalents earned on the accumulated amount of share units in the stock account are reinvested in additional share units based on the fair market value of the shares on the quarterly dividend payment dates. Such fair market values during fiscal 2019 were as follows: $97.61 on December 10, 2018; $100.16 on March 11, 2019; $103.23 on June 10, 2019 and $108.09 on September 9, 2019.

(c)

The amounts in this column represent interest earned during fiscal 2019 on the accumulated amount of board fees deferred to the cash account, including deferrals made to the cash account in fiscal 2019, at a rate equal to the 10-year U.S. Treasury Note rate (2.62%) on the first day of each plan year (January 1) plus 250 basis points.

2020 Proxy Statement27


PROPOSAL TWO—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has appointed E&Y to continue as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020. The firm of E&Y (and its predecessors) has been our independent registered public accounting firm since our incorporation in 1983. It is expected that representatives of E&Y will be present at the annual meeting. The representatives of E&Y will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

In accordance with good corporate governance practices, the Company submits the Audit Committee’s appointment of E&Y as its independent registered public accounting firm to our shareholders for ratification each year. If the appointment of E&Y is not so ratified, the Audit Committee will consider the outcome of the vote in its future selection of an independent registered public accounting firm.

As discussed in“Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policy” below, all professional services provided by E&Y werepre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with itspre-approval policy.

LOGOThe Board of Directors recommends that our shareholders
voteFOR the ratification of the appointment of E&Y as the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
for fiscal 2020.

Audit and Related Fees

Fees for professional services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, E&Y, in each of the last two fiscal years, in each of the following categories are:

   

September 30

 
   

2019

   

2018

 
   

($ In thousands)

 

Audit Fees

  

 

3,522

 

  

 

3,365

 

Audit-Related Fees

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Tax Fees

  

 

—  

 

  

 

15

 

All Other Fees

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Fees

  

 

3,522

 

  

 

3,380

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Audit Fees.    Fees for audit services include fees associated with the audit of our Annual Report on Form10-K, the assessment by the firm of our design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the reviews of our quarterly reports on Form10-Q. In addition, this amount includes fees associated with the issuance of consents and comfort letters relating to the registration of Company securities and assistance with the review of documents filed with the SEC, as well as fees for an audit provided in connection with a statutory filing.

28ATMOS ENERGY


Tax Fees.    Tax fees include fees relating to reviews of tax returns, tax consulting, and assistance with sales and use tax filings and audits.

Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee has adopted apre-approval policy relating to the provision of both audit andnon-audit services by E&Y. Our Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policy provides for thepre-approval of audit, audit-related, tax and other services specifically described in appendices to the policy on an annual basis. Such services arepre-approved up to a specified fee limit. All other permitted services, as well as proposed services exceeding thepre-approved fee limit, must be separatelypre-approved by the Audit Committee. Requests for services that require separate approval by the Audit Committee must be submitted to the Audit Committee by both our Chief Financial Officer and our independent registered public accounting firm and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The policy authorizes the Audit Committee to delegate to one or more of its memberspre-approval authority with respect to permitted services. The Audit Committee did not delegatepre-approval authority to any members during fiscal 2019 andpre-approved all audit and tax fees for services performed by E&Y in fiscal 2019 in accordance with suchpre-approval policy. The Audit Committee further concluded that the provision of these services by E&Y was compatible with maintaining its independence. The Audit CommitteePre-Approval Policy is available on our website at www.atmosenergy.com/esg/corporate-governance.

Audit Committee Report

Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. E&Y is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and for issuing audit reports on the financial statements and the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes on behalf of the Board.

In discharging its responsibility for the year ended September 30, 2019:

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Company with management.

The Audit Committee has discussed with E&Y the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301,Communications with Audit Committees, as amended.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from E&Y required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding E&Y’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has reviewed, evaluated and discussed with that firm the written report and its independence from the Company.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (which the Board has approved) that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended September 30, 2019 for filing with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the Audit Committee.

Richard A. Sampson, Chair

Kelly H. Compton

Rafael G. Garza

Robert C. Grable

Nancy K. Quinn

Name

  

Fees Earned

or Paid in Cash

($)(b)

   

Stock

Awards

($)(c)

   

Change in

Pension Value

and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)(d)

   

All Other

Compensation

($)(e)

   

Total  

($)  

    

John C. Ale

  

 

33,333

 

  

 

106,625

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

139,958

 

 

Robert W. Best

  

 

36,111

 

  

 

150,000

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

31,414

 

  

 

217,525

 

 

Kim R. Cocklin

  

 

225,000

 

  

 

150,000

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

4,060

 

  

 

379,060

 

 

Kelly H. Compton

  

 

100,000

 

  

 

150,000

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

4,060

 

  

 

254,060

 

 

Sean Donohue

  

 

100,000

 

  

 

150,000

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

250,000

 

 

Rafael G. Garza

  

 

100,000

 

  

 

150,000

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

250,000

 

 

Richard K. Gordon

  

 

136,875

 

  

 

150,000

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

286,875

 

 

Robert C. Grable

  

 

39,722

 

  

 

150,000

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

31,414

 

  

 

221,136

 

 

Nancy K. Quinn

  

 

114,375

 

  

 

150,000

 

  

 

4

 

  

 

4

 

  

 

264,383

 

 

Richard A. Sampson

  

 

111,250

 

  

 

150,000

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

261,250

 

 

Stephen R. Springer

  

 

25,000

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

31,414

 

  

 

56,414

 

 

Diana J. Walters

  

 

100,000

 

  

 

150,000

 

  

 

1,705

 

  

 

5,435

 

  

 

257,140

 

 

Richard Ware II

 

25,000

—  

—  

19,079

44,079

Frank Yoho

107,500

150,000

—  

—  

257,500

(a)

No stock options were awarded to our directors and no non-equity incentive plan compensation was earned by our directors in fiscal 2022. Mr. Best, Mr. Grable, Mr. Springer, and Mr. Ware served as directors during fiscal 2022 until their retirements on February 9, 2022, February 9, 2022, November 30, 2021, and December 1, 2021, respectively. Mr. Ale was elected to the Board effective June 1, 2022.

(b)

Non-employee directors may defer all or a part of their annual cash retainer and fees under our Directors Plan. During fiscal 2022, Mr. Sampson, Mr. Springer, and Ms. Walters elected to defer a portion of their director fees (a total of $51,875), under such plan, which amounts are included in this column and are described in the table below. Deferred amounts are invested, at the election of the participating director, either in a stock account or a cash account. Prior to their respective retirements, Mr. Grable elected to forego the receipt in cash of a total of 30% of his director fees ($11,917) and instead received shares of Company Stock under our LTIP in fiscal 2022, while Mr. Ware elected to receive in lieu of cash a total of 70% of his director fees ($17,500) in Company Stock under our LTIP. These shares do not contain any restrictions and were awarded on the first trading day of the quarter in which such fees were earned based on the fair market value of our stock on that date. As a result of such elections, a total of 128 shares were issued to Mr. Grable and 197 shares to Mr. Ware on the following dates and at the following fair market values during fiscal 2022: (i) October 1, 2021, at a fair market value of $88.53 per share for Mr. Grable and Mr. Ware; and (ii) January 3, 2022, at a fair market value of $104.28 per share for Mr. Grable. Fractional shares were paid in cash subsequent to the end of fiscal 2022.

(c)

The amounts in this column represent the fair market value on the date of grant, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the share units or RSUs awarded to each of our non-employee directors under our LTIP for service on the Board in fiscal 2022 on March 11, 2022 at a fair market value of $113.40 per share (for all directors other than Mr. Ale) and on June 15, 2022 at a fair market value of $106.63 per share for Mr. Ale. Per their election, each of Mr. Cocklin, Ms. Compton, and Ms. Walters received 1,322 RSUs of which all had not vested at 2022 fiscal year end. All other directors each received 1,322 share units.

(d)

The amounts in this column represent the amount of above-market interest earned during fiscal 2022 on the accumulated amount of Board fees deferred to cash accounts. Interest considered above-market is the incremental rate of interest earned above 120% of the 10-year U.S. Treasury Note rate, which is reset on January 1 each year.

(e)

For Mr. Cocklin and Ms. Compton, the amounts in this column represent the dividends paid on their RSUs on December 13, 2021, March 7, 2022, June 6, 2022, and September 6, 2022. For Ms. Quinn, the amount in this column represents the market rate of interest accrued during fiscal 2022 on the accumulated amount of board fees deferred to a cash account. For Ms. Walters, the amount in this column represents the dividends paid on her RSUs on December 13, 2021, March 7, 2022, June 6, 2022, and September 6, 2022 as well as the market rate of interest accrued during fiscal 2022 on the accumulated amount of board fees deferred to a cash account, including deferrals made to the cash account in fiscal 2022. The only directors to receive perquisites and other personal benefits with an aggregate value equal to or exceeding $10,000 during fiscal 2022 were Mr. Best, Mr. Grable, Mr. Springer, and Mr. Ware. Each of these directors received perquisites and other personal benefits relating to retirement gifts and related items for each director in recognition of their service on the Board in the amount of $31,414 for Mr. Best, Mr. Grable, and Mr. Springer, and $19,079 for Mr. Ware. All such perquisites and other benefits were valued at the aggregate incremental cost to the Company.

2023 Proxy Statement25


Director Deferred Board Fees

The following table sets forth, for each participating non-employee director, the amount of director compensation deferred during fiscal 2022 and cumulative deferred compensation as of September 30, 2022:

Director Deferred Board Fees for Fiscal Year 2022

Name

 

Board Fees

Deferred

to Stock

Account

($)(a)

  

Dividend

Equivalents

Earned on

Stock Account

and

Reinvested

($)(b)

  

Cumulative

Board Fees

Deferred to

Stock Account at

September 30

($)

  

Board Fees

Deferred to

Cash Account

($)

  

Interest

Earned on

Cash Account

($)(c)

  

Cumulative

Board Fees

Deferred

to Cash

Account at

September 30

($)

    

Nancy K. Quinn

 

 

—  

 

 

 

18,855

 

 

 

401,107

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

200

 

 

Richard A. Sampson

 

 

14,375

 

 

 

1,690

 

 

 

59,753

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

Stephen R. Springer

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

Diana J. Walters

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

27,500

 

 

 

3,080

 

 

 

90,471

 

 

(a)

Mr. Sampson elected to receive 50% of his director fees earned through December 31, 2021, in deferred stock. The $14,375 amount represents 162 share units received in fiscal 2022. Mr. Springer elected to receive 40% of his director fees in deferred stock until his retirement in November 2021. The $10,000 amount represents 113 share units received in fiscal 2022. Deferrals of amounts in the stock account are treated as though the deferred amounts are invested in Company Stock at the fair market value of the shares on the date earned. Shares of Company Stock equal to the number of share units in a director’s stock account are issued to such director at the time of separation from service.

(b)

Dividend equivalents earned on the accumulated amount of share units in the stock account are reinvested in additional share units based on the fair market value of the shares on the quarterly dividend payment dates. Such fair market values during fiscal 2022 were as follows: $97.33 on December 13, 2021; $115.73 on March 7, 2022; $116.75 on June 6, 2022 and $115.04 on September 6, 2022.

(c)

The amounts in this column represent interest earned during fiscal 2022 on the accumulated amount of board fees deferred to the cash account, including deferrals made to the cash account in fiscal 2022, at a rate equal to the 10-year U.S. Treasury Note rate (1.63%) on the first day of each plan year (January 1) plus 250 basis points.

26ATMOS ENERGY


PROPOSAL TWO—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has appointed E&Y to continue as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2023. E&Y (and its predecessors) has been our independent registered public accounting firm since our incorporation in 1983. It is expected that representatives of E&Y will be present at the annual meeting. The representatives of E&Y will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

In accordance with good corporate governance practices, the Company submits the Audit Committee’s appointment of E&Y as its independent registered public accounting firm to our shareholders for ratification each year. If the appointment of E&Y is not so ratified, the Audit Committee will consider the outcome of the vote in its future selection of an independent registered public accounting firm.

As discussed in “Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy” below, all professional services provided by E&Y were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with its pre-approval policy.

LOGOThe Board of Directors recommends that our shareholders
vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of E&Y as the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
for fiscal 2023.

Audit and Related Fees

Fees for professional services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, E&Y, in each of the last two fiscal years, in each of the following categories are:

   

September 30

 
   

2022

   

2021

 
   

($ In thousands)

 

Audit Fees

  

 

4,054

 

  

 

3,627

 

Audit-Related Fees

  

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Tax Fees

  

 

91

 

  

 

258

 

All Other Fees

  

 

200

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Fees

  

 

4,345

 

  

 

3,885

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Audit Fees.    Fees for audit services include fees associated with the audit of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, the assessment by the firm of our design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the reviews of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. In addition, this amount includes fees associated with the issuance of consents and comfort letters relating to the registration of Company securities and assistance with the review of documents filed with the SEC, as well as fees for an audit provided in connection with a statutory filing.

Tax Fees.    Tax fees include fees relating to review of tax returns, tax advisory services, and general consultation.

All Other Fees.    All other fees include fees relating to S/4 Hana pre-implementation services.

2023 Proxy Statement27


Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit Committee has adopted a pre-approval policy relating to the provision of both audit and non-audit services by E&Y. Our Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy provides for the pre-approval of audit, audit-related, tax and other services specifically described in appendices to the policy on an annual basis. Such services are pre-approved up to a specified fee limit. All other permitted services, as well as proposed services exceeding the pre-approved fee limit, must be separately pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Requests for services that require separate approval by the Audit Committee must be submitted to the Audit Committee by both our Chief Financial Officer and our independent registered public accounting firm and must include a joint statement as to whether, in their view, the request is consistent with the SEC’s rules on auditor independence. The policy authorizes the Audit Committee to delegate to one or more of its members pre-approval authority with respect to permitted services, provided that the member reports any decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. All of the services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2022 were approved in accordance with the policy. The Audit Committee further concluded that the provision of these services by E&Y was compatible with maintaining its independence. The Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy is available on our website at https://www.atmosenergy.com/company/corporate-responsibility-reports.

Audit Committee Report

Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and the financial reporting process. E&Y is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and for issuing audit reports on the financial statements and the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes on behalf of the Board.

In discharging its responsibility for the year ended September 30, 2022:

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Company with management.

The Audit Committee has discussed with E&Y the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the SEC.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from E&Y required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding E&Y’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has reviewed, evaluated and discussed with that firm the written report and its independence from the Company.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (which the Board has approved) that the Company’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2022 for filing with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the Audit Committee.

Nancy K, Quinn, Chair

Rafael G. Garza

Diana J. Walters

Frank Yoho

28ATMOS ENERGY 2020 Proxy Statement29


PROPOSAL THREE—APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Background of the Proposal

It has been our practice since our February 2011 annual meeting to ask our shareholders to vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (“Say-on-Pay”) at every annual meeting. At our annual meeting of shareholders in February 2022, our shareholders voted by a substantial margin to adopt the recommendation of our Board to continue to vote on the Say-on-Pay proposal every year at our annual meeting. Unless the Board changes our policy, the next Say-on-Pay vote following the 2023 annual meeting will be held at our 2024 annual meeting.

Executive Compensation

As discussed below in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, the Board believes that our current executive compensation program directly links executive compensation to our financial performance and aligns the interests of our named executive officers with those of our shareholders and customers. Our Board also believes that our executive compensation program provides our named executive officers with a balanced compensation package that includes a reasonable base salary along with annual and long-term incentive compensation plans that provide compensation based on the Company’s financial performance.

The HR Committee annually reviews the Company’s overall approach to executive compensation to see that the Company’s current benefits, perquisites, policies and practices continue to be in line with the best practices of companies in the natural gas distribution industry and to assist us with the hiring and retention of a high-quality management team. The “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, beginning on page 30, includes additional details about our executive compensation program. We ask that our shareholders indicate their support for our Say-on-Pay proposal by voting “FOR” the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Atmos Energy Corporation approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of its named executive officers for fiscal 2022, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative.

This Say-on-Pay vote is advisory, therefore it will not be binding on the Company. However, the HR Committee and the Board value the opinions of our shareholders and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

LOGOThe Board of Directors recommends that our
shareholders vote FOR this advisory proposal to
approve the compensation of our named executive officers(“Say-on-Pay”) at every annual meeting. At our annual meeting of shareholders in February 2011 and again in February 2016, our shareholders voted by a substantial margin to adopt the recommendation of our Board to vote on theSay-on-Pay proposal every year at our annual meeting until the next frequency vote on theSay-on-Pay proposal is held, which is expected at our 2021 annual meeting.

Executive Compensation
officers.

As discussed below in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement, the Board believes that our current executive compensation program directly links executive compensation to our financial performance and aligns the interests of our named executive officers with those of our shareholders and customers. Our Board also believes that our executive compensation program provides our named executive officers with a balanced compensation package that includes a reasonable base salary along with annual and long-term incentive compensation plans that provide compensation based on the Company’s financial performance.

The HR Committee annually reviews the Company’s overall approach to executive compensation to see that the Company’s current benefits, perquisites, policies and practices continue to be in line with the best practices of companies in the natural gas distribution industry and to assist us with the hiring and retention of a high-quality management team. The“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section, beginning on page 31, includes additional details about our executive compensation program. We ask that our shareholders indicate their support for ourSay-on-Pay proposal by voting “FOR” the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Atmos Energy Corporation approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of its named executive officers for fiscal 2019, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the related compensation tables, notes and narrative.

ThisSay-on-Pay vote is advisory, therefore it will not be binding on the Company. However, the HR Committee and the Board value the opinions of our shareholders and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

 

 

2023 Proxy Statement29
LOGOThe Board of Directors recommends that our
shareholders voteFOR this advisory proposal to
approve the compensation of our named executive
officers.


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides an overview of our executive compensation program objectives and strategy, and the elements of compensation that we provide to our named executive officers, including the process we employed in reaching the decisions to pay the specific amounts and types of executive compensation discussed. Our named executive officers for fiscal 2022 are listed below:

 

30ATMOS ENERGY


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISName

Executive SummaryTitle

This Compensation DiscussionJ. Kevin Akers(a)

President and Analysis provides an overview of our executive compensation program objectivesChief Executive Officer

Christopher T. Forsythe(b)

Senior Vice President and strategy,Chief Financial Officer

Karen E. Hartsfield(c)

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and the elements of compensation that we provide to our named executive officers, including the process we employed in reaching the decisions to pay the specific amounts and types of executive compensation discussed. Our named executive officers for fiscal 2019 are listed below:Corporate Secretary

Name

Title

Kim R. Cocklin(a)

Executive Chairman of the Board

Michael E. Haefner(b)

Past President and Chief Executive Officer

J. Kevin Akers(c)

President and Chief Executive Officer

Christopher T. Forsythe(d)

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

David J. Park(e)John S. McDill(d)

 

Senior Vice President, Utility Operations

J. Matt Robbins(e)

Senior Vice President, Human Resources

 

 (a)

Mr. Cocklin, who served as President and Chief Executive Officer from October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2015 and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2017, was appointed by the Board of Directors as Executive Chairman of the Board, effective October 1, 2017.

(b)

Mr. Haefner, who served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2017, was appointed by the Board of Directors as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective October 1, 2017. Mr. Haefner resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer effective September 30, 2019, and will retire from the Company and Board of Directors January 2, 2020.

(c)

Mr. Akers, who served as President of theKentucky/Mid-States Division of the Company from May 2007 through December 31, 2016, and Senior Vice President, Safety and Enterprise Services from January 1, 2017 to November 5, 2018, was appointed by the Board as Executive Vice President, effective November 6, 2018. On August 5, 2019, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Akers as President and Chief Executive Officer, effective October 1, 2019.

(d)

Mr. Forsythe, who served as Vice President and Controller of the Company from May 2009 through January 31, 2017, was appointed by the Board of Directors as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, effective February 1, 2017.

(e)

Mr. Park, who served as President of the West Texas Division of the Company from May 2012 through December 31, 2016, was appointed by the Board of Directors as Senior Vice President, Utility Operations, effective January 1, 2017.

Fiscal 2019 Business and Performance Highlights

Over the past eight years, our operating strategy has focused on modernizing our distribution and transmission system to improve the safety and reliability of the system. Since that time, our capital expenditures have increased approximately 13% annually. Our ability to increase capital spending each year to modernize our system has increased our rate base, which has also resulted in increasing earnings per share.

This trend continued during fiscal 2019, as adjusted net income increased to $511.4 million, or $4.35 per diluted share forKentucky/Mid-States Division of the year endedCompany from May 2007 through December 31, 2016, Senior Vice President, Safety and Enterprise Services from January 1, 2017 through November 5, 2018, and Executive Vice President from November 6, 2018 through September 30, 2019, compared with net incomewas appointed by the Board of $603.1 million, or $5.43 per diluted share in the prior year. Adjusted net income for the year ended September 30, 2018, was $444.3 million, or $4.00 per diluted share, after excluding the effects of implementing the TCJA from the prior year.* Capital expenditures for fiscal 2019 totaled approximately $1.7 billion, with approximately 87% of this amount invested to improve the safetyDirectors as President and reliability of our distribution and transmission systems.

Diluted Earnings Per Share*    Declared Dividends Per Share    Total Shareholder Return
$4.35    $2.10    23.8%

17th Consecutive Year of

EPS Growth

    Up from $1.94 for Fiscal 2018    3-year cumulative total shareholder return of 63.3%

*

Represents a measure of performance that is calculated and presented other than in accordance with GAAP. See Appendix A for an explanation of these non-GAAP measures, a full reconciliation of these non-GAAP results to our GAAP net income and diluted net income per share results, and a brief discussion of why we use these non-GAAP performance measures.

2020 Proxy Statement31


Compensation Highlights

Our executive compensation program is built upon our strategy of “Total Rewards.” Under Total Rewards, we take a comprehensive view of all compensation plans and employee benefits that comprise the total package of executive compensation we provide to our named executive officers. Total Rewards is based on the payment of (i) total cash compensation, composed of base salary and the annual incentive compensation award and (ii) total direct compensation, composed of total cash compensation and the annualized present value of long-term incentive compensation awards, being targeted at the 50th percentile of all such compensation for equivalent positions at companies of comparable size in our primary industry, natural gas distribution, which is represented primarily by companies in our proxy peer group, as discussed below under “Competitive Executive Compensation Benchmarking,” beginning on page 40. We believe this strategy fosters a philosophy of “pay for executive performance” through the use of both annual and long-term incentive compensation. The pay mix at target grant date value for our Chief Executive Officer, effective October 1, 2019.

(b)

Mr. Forsythe, who served as Vice President and other named executive officers for fiscal 2019Controller of the Company from May 2009 through January 31, 2017, was primarily long-termappointed by the Board of Directors as Senior Vice President and performance-based,Chief Financial Officer, effective February 1, 2017.

(c)

Ms. Hartsfield, who served as describedSenior Attorney from June 2015 through August 2017, was appointed by the Board of Directors as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary, effective August 7, 2017.

(d)

Mr. McDill, who served as Vice President, Pipeline Operations from May 2012 through September 2021, was appointed by the Board of Directors as Senior Vice President, Utility Operations, effective October 1, 2021.

(e)

Mr. Robbins, who served as Director of Compensation and Benefits from May 2013 through February 2015 and Vice President, Human Resources from February 2015 to January 2017, was appointed by the Board of Directors as Senior Vice President, Human Resources, effective January 1, 2017.

Fiscal 2022 Business and Performance Highlights

Over the past eleven years, our operating strategy has focused on modernizing our distribution and transmission system to improve the safety and reliability of the system while reducing regulatory lag. Since that time, our capital expenditures have increased approximately 14% annually. Our ability to increase capital spending each year to modernize our system has increased our rate base, which has also resulted in increasing earnings per share.

This trend continued during fiscal 2022. In fiscal 2022, we generated net income of $774.4 million or $5.60 per diluted share representing increases over net income for the year ended September 30, 2021 of $665.6 million or $5.12 per diluted share. Capital expenditures for fiscal 2022 totaled approximately $2.4 billion, with approximately 88% of this amount invested to improve the safety and reliability of our distribution and transmission systems.

  

 

Diluted Earnings Per

Share

   

 

Declared Dividends Per

Share

  
 $5.60   $2.72 
  

20th Consecutive Year of

EPS Growth

   Up from $2.50 for Fiscal
2021
  

30ATMOS ENERGY


Compensation Highlights

Our executive compensation program is built upon our strategy of Total Rewards. Under Total Rewards, we take a comprehensive view of all compensation plans and employee benefits that comprise the total package of executive compensation we provide to our named executive officers. Total Rewards is based on the payment of (i) total cash compensation, composed of base salary and the annual incentive compensation award and (ii) total direct compensation, composed of total cash compensation and the annualized present value of long-term incentive compensation awards, being targeted at the 50th percentile of all such compensation for equivalent positions at companies of comparable size in our primary industry, natural gas distribution, which is represented primarily by companies in our proxy peer group, as discussed below under “Competitive Executive Compensation Benchmarking,” beginning on page 39. We believe this strategy fosters a philosophy of “pay for executive performance” through the use of both annual and long-term incentive compensation. The pay mix at target grant date value for our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers for fiscal 2022 was primarily long-term and performance-based, as shown in the graphics below.

Fiscal 2022 Target Compensation Mix

 

Fiscal 2019 Target Compensation Mix

LOGOLOGO
LOGOLOGO

2019 Actual Results

The table below shows the target performance and actual results for our fiscal 2019 performance-based compensation. Based on our fiscal 2019

2022 Actual Results

The table below shows the target performance and actual results for our fiscal 2022 performance-based compensation. Based on our fiscal 2022 performance, the following incentive programs resulted in above target payouts. See “Annual Incentive Compensation,” beginning on page 3635 and “Long-Term Incentive Compensation,” beginning on page 37.36.

 

Incentive Program Element

  

Performance

Metric

  Target
Performance
  2019 Actual
Performance
  

2019

Payout

(as a % of  
Target)

  

Performance

Metric

  

Target

Performance

  

2022 Actual

Performance

  

2022

Payout

  (as a % of    

Target)

Annual Incentive Plan

  EPS

(100% of award)

  $4.28  $4.35  133%  EPS

(100% of award)

  $5.50  $5.60  136%

Long-Term Incentive Program

2017-2019 Cycle

  EPS

(100% of award)

  $11.42  $11.99  150%

Long-Term Incentive Program

2020-2022 Cycle

  EPS

(100% of award)

  $14.96  $15.44  100%*

*

The actual performance level attained over the performance period was 164% of the target performance. However, because the Company’s TSR for fiscal 2020-2022 was negative, compensation for each of the executive officers under the LTIP for the fiscal 2020-2022 cycle was limited to the target level of performance except for Mr. McDill whose grant was made prior to him becoming an executive officer.

 

32 ATMOS ENERGY 2023 Proxy Statement31


Executive Compensation Program Objectives and Strategy

Our Total Rewards strategy is reviewed each year and updated as needed by our HR Committee, with assistance from its independent executive compensation consultant. None of our named executive officers have an employment agreement with the Company. We believe that our executive compensation program provides our named executive officers with a balanced compensation approach each year by providing a market-competitive base salary along with participation in annual and long-term incentive compensation plans that are based solely on the Company’s financial performance. These incentive plans are designed to reward our named executive officers on both an annual and long-term basis if they attain specified target goals,targets, the attainment of which does not require the taking of an unreasonable amount of risk, as discussed in “Compensation Risk Assessment,” beginning on page 57.55.

Our executive compensation program is designed to ensure that the interests of our named executive officers are closely aligned with those of our shareholders and customers and that our named executive officers are paid above-target incentive compensation only when the Company’s financial performance warrants the payment of such compensation. We believe that our executive compensation program is effective in allowing our organization to attract and retain highly-qualified senior management team members who can deliver outstanding performance. Our executive compensation program is founded upon the following principles:

 

  

Our compensation strategy should be aligned with our overall business strategy of providing safe, quality and reliable service to our customers, seeking ongoing improvements in operating efficiencies and focusing upon growth opportunities.

 

  

Overall pay targets should reflect the intent to pay named executive officer base salaries at the 50th percentile of the competitive market practice with targeted total cash compensation (base salary plus annual incentive award) and targeted total direct compensation (total cash compensation plus annualized present value of grants of long-term equity incentive compensation) to be paid at the 50th percentile of competitive market practice if established performance targets are reached.

 

  

Key executives charged with the responsibility for establishing and executing business strategy should have incentive compensation opportunities that are aligned with the creation of shareholder value and include upside potential with commensurate downside risk.

 

  

Stock ownership, which is an important component of our executive compensation strategy, should be closely alignedalign our executives with the interests of our shareholders. To facilitate stock ownership, stock-based incentive plans should be utilized, along with share ownership guidelines.

 

32ATMOS ENERGY 2020 Proxy Statement33


Our executive compensation practices include:

 

 LOGO

Executive officer awards under the Incentive Plan and LTIP are generally capped at 200% of target. These awards are capped at 200% of target.target if the Company’s total shareholder return for the performance period is negative.

 

 LOGO

Fifty percent of long-term incentive compensation is performance-contingent.

 

 LOGO

We have in place aOur clawback policy that provides for the repayment or forfeiture of all incentive-based compensation in certain circumstances.

 

 LOGO

Executives and directors are subject to stockshare ownership guidelines and retention requirements.

LOGO

Our change in control severance arrangements do not exceed three times the sum of a named executive officer’s base salary and their most recent annual award of incentive compensation.

 

 LOGO

Our change in control severance arrangements are triggered only by an involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of duties.

LOGO

Severance under our change in control severance arrangements does not exceed three times the sum of a named executive officer’s base salary and their most recent annual Incentive Plan payment.

 

 LOGO

We have no employment agreements with our officers.

 

 LOGO

We prohibit hedging and pledging of our securities at any time by any employees and directors.

 

 LOGO

There is no automatic single trigger immediate vesting of outstanding grants of awards under our LTIP upon a change in control.

 

 LOGO

Our change in control severance arrangements do not contain excise taxgross-up payments.

 

 LOGO

We have no excessive perquisites for executives.

 

 LOGO

We pay dividends on performance-contingent stock awardsperformance-based RSUs when vesting is complete and then only ifto the extent performance targets are met.

 

 

34 ATMOS ENERGY 2023 Proxy Statement33


Elements of Executive Compensation

The following table summarizes the various elements of executive compensation that we provided to our named executive officers for fiscal 2019,2022, followed by a more detailed discussion of each element, why we pay each element, how we determine the amount we pay under each element and how each element fits into our overall compensation objectives.

 

  
   

Element

 Description  

Objective within

Compensation Program

  
 Base Salary 

Fixed cash compensation, subject to annual review and adjusted in response to changes in performance, duties, strategic importance or competitive salary practices

  

  Reflects roles, responsibilities, skills, experience and performance

 

     

  Provides base compensation at a level consistent with competitive salary practices

 

  

 

 

 

LOGO

 

 Annual Incentive Compensation 

Annual cash performance award based on achievement of Company financial performance measures with option to convert all or portion of award to time-lapse RSUs under our LTIP with three-year cliff vesting at a 20% premium

  

  Increases alignment of senior management and shareholders’ interests by linking pay and performance

 

  Promotes achievement of annual Company financial goals by linking pay to attainment of such goals

 

 

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

 Performance-based

One-half in performance-based equity awards payable only if performance goals are achieved during the three-fiscal year performance period. Time-lapseOne-half in time-lapse equity awards also payable, with cliff vesting, at the end of the three-fiscal year period.

  

  Motivates and rewards financial performance over a sustained period

 

  

  Increases alignment of senior management and shareholders’ interests by encouraging share ownership of senior management

 

  

  Enhances retention of senior management

 

  

  Rewards strong total shareholder return and earnings growth

 

  
 Retirement Benefits 

Tax-qualified retirement benefits, supplemental retirement and other benefits

  

  Provides for current and future needs of senior management

 

   

  Enhances recruitment and retention

 

   

  Follows competitive market practices

 

  
 

Change in Control

Severance Benefits

 

Change in control severance agreements with contingent amounts payable only if employment is terminated under certain conditions following a change in control

  

  Enhances retention of senior management by providing continuity of employment

 

  

  Promotes objective evaluation and execution of potential changes to the Company’s strategy and structure

Base Salary.    The payment of a base salary is intended to provide a stable, fixed amount of income to our named executive officers for theirday-to-day job performance. Base salaries represent a relatively small portion of total compensation. However, the amount of base salary paid to each named executive officer is a major determinant of the amounts of all other elements of compensation. Base salaries for each position are compared on the basis of job content primarily toThe HR Committee reviews base salaries for similar positions in companies in our proxy peer groupannually, and generally targetingtargets the 50th percentile of the competitive market practice.

 

34ATMOS ENERGY 2020 Proxy Statement35


The base salaries for all named executive officers were determined by the HR Committee after consideringpercentile of the competitive benchmarking data for each position discussed below,market practice. Annual salary adjustments are not automatic or guaranteed, but rather based on the committee’s subjective evaluation of the performance of each named executive officer, the value of the individual in the position to the Company relative to other positions and their level of experience, the Company’s base salary increase budget and guidelines as well as current economic conditions. As a result, the HR Committee approved base salaries in the amounts noted in the table below for calendar year 2019, with the exception of Mr. Akers whose base salary was effective on November 6, 2018, due to his promotion to Executive Vice President as of that date.2022.

 

Name

  

Base

    Salary ($)    

Kim R. Cocklin

700,000

Michael E. Haefner

975,000

J. Kevin Akers

   

 

475,0001,000,000

Christopher T. Forsythe

   

 

450,000516,360

David J. ParkKaren E. Hartsfield

   

 

425,000457,600

John S. McDill

442,000

J. Matt Robbins

345,355

The HR Committee believes that the base salaries provided to each of the named executive officers are appropriate to retain and motivate them, are competitive with salaries offered for similar positions by companies in our proxy peer group and are consistent with our Total Rewards strategy.

Annual Incentive Compensation.    Through our Incentive Plan, we provide our named executive officers an opportunity to earn an annual incentive award based upon the Company’s financial performance each year as measured by our fully diluted EPS. The HR Committee believes that EPS is the most appropriate measurement of our financial performance both on an annual and long-term basis, because it most accurately reflects the growth and performance of our operations. The EPS measurement is also one of the most currently well-known measurements of overall financial performance of public companies. The HR Committee believes that using this measurement as the basis for our incentive compensation plans best aligns the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders and customers.

For fiscal 2019,2022, the HR Committee reviewed competitive compensation benchmarking data, as discussed below, to establish an annual target opportunity expressed as a percentage of base salary earned during fiscal 20192022 for each named executive officer. Such target incentive award opportunities are reviewed each year and benchmarked against the 50th percentile for similar positions within companies in our proxy peer group as described above in “Executive Compensation Program Objectives and Strategy,” beginning on page 33.32. The Incentive Plan targets for fiscal 20192022 for each of the named executive officers were as follows:follows and remained unchanged as a percentage of base salary from fiscal 2021 levels:

 

Name

  

Fiscal Year 2019
2022

    Incentive Plan Target    

as Percentage (%) of

Base Salary Earned

Kim R. Cocklin

100

Michael E. Haefner

100

J. Kevin Akers

   

 

65100

Christopher T. Forsythe

   

 

65

David Karen E. Hartsfield

60

John S. McDill

60

J. ParkMatt Robbins

   

 

60

At its meeting in October 2018,November 2021, the HR Committee established the threshold, target and maximum performance levels of EPS upon which the Incentive Plan’s awards would be based for fiscal 2019,2022, along with the corresponding percentages of target awards to be paid out. The target EPS performance level was based on our annual business plan and budget and considered such factors as the allowed rates of return in our established service areas, natural

36ATMOS ENERGY


gas pricing and volatility, budgeted capital expenditures, expected growth within our service areas, competitive factors from other service providers and other business considerations embedded in our annual business planning process.

2023 Proxy Statement35


The HR Committee has continued to set increasingly challenging EPS target performance levels under the Incentive Plan each fiscal year, as demonstrated by increasing such target performance levels on average by 9% per year over the last three fiscal years. Such target performance levels have also continued to be within the range of announced EPS guidance provided to the public in November of each year.

The following table summarizes the performance levels and actual performance level attainment under the Incentive Plan for fiscal 2019:2022:

 

Performance Level

  

 

Annual EPS
Performance

  

 

Percentage (%) of
Target Award Earned 

  

 

Annual EPS
Performance

  

 

Percentage (%) of
  Target Award Earned  

Below Threshold

  

 

<$4.07  

  

 

No award

  

<$5.23  

  

No award

Threshold

  

 

$4.07

  

 

50

  

$5.23

  

50

Target

  

 

$4.28

  

 

100

  

$5.50

  

100

Actual EPS

  

 

$4.35

  

 

133

  

$5.60

  

136

Maximum

  

 

$4.49

  

 

200

  

$5.78

  

200

Since the actual EPS performance level attained was between the target of $4.28$5.50 per share and maximum of $4.49$5.78 per share, straight-line interpolation was used to compute the percentage of the target award earned. The HR Committee has the discretion under the Incentive Plan to make downward adjustments to earned awards but may not make upward adjustments. For fiscal 2019,2022, the HR Committee did not use its discretion to make negative adjustments to any awards for any of our named executive officers. However, the HR Committee does place a limit under certain conditions on the amount of earned awards for all our named executive officers. If the Company’s TSR during any fiscal year is negative, the earned award for each such officer for that fiscal year will be limited to the amount earned at the target level of performance. This limitation was not applicable infor the fiscal 20192022 performance period since the Company’s TSR was positive for the fiscal year at 24%.such performance period.

Awards under the Incentive Plan are paid in cash and are based on the participant’s eligible earnings received during the fiscal year. However, under the terms of the Incentive Plan, participants may elect prior to the beginning of each fiscal year to convert all or a portion of their final earned awards to time-lapse RSUs with three-year cliff vesting, with a premium equal to 20% of the amount converted such that the value of time-lapse RSUs received will equal 120% of the value of the final earned award, and with such units being awarded under our LTIP. Each named executive officer elected to receive 100% cash for his or her fiscal 2022 Incentive Plan award.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation.    The HR Committee grants awards under our LTIP each fiscal year that are structured with 50% of the targeted long-term value in the form of three-fiscal year performance-based RSUs (measured by cumulative EPS over the three-year period) and with the remaining 50% in the form of time-lapse RSUs with three-year cliff vesting. The HR Committee bases the actual number and value of awards granted primarily on the competitive compensation benchmarking of grants made by the companies in our proxy peer group, as discussed below.

 

TIME-LAPSE RSUs

 

50%

   

PERFORMANCE-BASED RSUs

 

50%

      

  Alignment with shareholders

 

  Facilitates share ownership

 

  Strong retention vehicle

   

  Tied to achievement of long-term operational objectives

  Alignment with shareholders

 

  Facilitates share ownership

 

  Strong retention vehicle

        

 

36ATMOS ENERGY 2020 Proxy Statement37


The HR Committee bases the three fiscal year cumulative EPS target performance levels on the same factors they utilize for our Incentive Plan described above. The HR Committee has also historically set increasingly challenging cumulative three-fiscal year EPS target performance levels each year, by increasing such target performance levels on average of about 17% per year for grants over the last three fiscal years.year. The HR Committee believes this performance is in alignment with the Company’s shareholder return performance over that same time period. The following table summarizes the performance levels and actual performance attainment levels for the fiscal 2017-20192020-2022 performance period relating to the grants of performance-based RSUs awarded in May 2017:2020:

 

Performance Level

  

 

Cumulative
EPS Performance

  

 

Percentage (%) of
Target Award Earned 

  

 

Cumulative
EPS Performance

(a)

  

 

Percentage (%) of
  Target Award Earned  

Below Threshold

  

 

<$10.28  

  

 

No award

  

<$14.21  

  

No award

Threshold

  

 

$10.28

  

 

50

  

$14.21

  

50

Target

  

 

$11.42

  

 

100

  

$14.96

  

100

Actual Performance (a)

  

 

$11.99

  

 

150

  

$15.44

  

100(b)

Maximum

  

 

$12.56

  

 

200

  

$15.71

  

200

 

 

(a)  The performance levels and actual performance attainment during the three-fiscal year performance period exclude the effects both of (i) aone-time income tax benefit related to the TCJAa legislative change in Kansas that reduced our state deferred tax rate during fiscal 20182020 of $1.43$0.17 per diluted share and (ii) unrealized gains or losses recognized of $0.10 per diluted share by the Company’s nonregulated operations during the portion ofshare.

(b)  The actual performance level attained over the performance period was 164% of the target performance. However, because the Company’s TSR for fiscal 2020-2022 was negative, compensation for the executive officers under the LTIP for fiscal 2020-2022 was limited to the target level of performance except for Mr. McDill whose grant was made prior to him becoming an executive officer, so his compensation was paid out at 164% of the sale of our natural gas marketing business on January 1, 2017.target performance.

Since the actual performance level attained over the performance period was $11.99$15.44 per share, each named executive officer earned 150%164% of their target award. The awards were paid in the form of shares of commonCompany stock issued in November 20192022 with the named executive officers also receiving cumulative cash dividend equivalents over the three-fiscal year performance period on such awards. As with the payout of Incentive Plan awards, if the Company’s TSR during the performance period is negative, the earned award for each such officer for such performance period will be limited to the amount earned at the target level of performance. This limitation was not applicableBecause the Company’s TSR for the fiscal 2017-20192020-2022 performance period sincewas negative, compensation for the Company’s TSRexecutive officers under the LTIP for fiscal 2020-2022 was positivelimited to the target level of performance except for such performance periodMr. McDill whose grant was made prior to him becoming an executive officer, so his compensation was paid out at 63%.164% of the target performance.

At its meeting in October 2018,November 2021, the HR Committee also established the threshold, target and maximum performance levels of cumulative EPS upon which performance-based RSUs awards would be based for the fiscal 2019-20212022-2024 performance period, along with the corresponding percentages of target awards. The three-fiscal year cumulative EPS target performance level was based on the same factors utilized by the HR Committee for our Incentive Plan described above. The HR Committee then awarded grants to the named executive officers at its meeting in May 2019,2022, which were later ratified by the Board, of performance-based RSUs for the fiscal 2019-20212022-2024 performance period. The following table shows the three yearthree-year performance criteria for such period:

 

Performance Level

  

 

Cumulative
EPS Performance

  

 

Percentage (%) of
Target Award Earned 

  

 

Cumulative
EPS Performance

  

 

Percentage (%) of
  Target Award Earned  

Below Threshold

  

 

<$13.07  

  

 

No award

  

<$16.80  

  

No award

Threshold

  

 

$13.07

  

 

50

  

$16.80

  

50

Target

  

 

$13.76

  

 

100

  

$17.69

  

100

Maximum

  

 

$14.45

  

 

200

  

$18.58

  

200

Retirement Benefits.    All our current named executive officers, other than Ms. Hartsfield and Mr. Robbins, participate in our Pension Account Plan (“PAP”), which is a qualified, cash balance defined benefit pension plan.

2023 Proxy Statement37


Benefits under this plan become vested andnon-forfeitable after completion of three years of continuous employment. For any named executive officer who retires

38ATMOS ENERGY


with vested benefits under the plan, the compensation shown as “Salary” in the “Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019202,2,” beginning on page 43,41, would be considered eligible compensation in determining benefits. See the discussion under“Pension AccountPlan” on page 48,45, for more information about this plan.

In addition, all our named executive officers participate in our Retirement Savings Plan (“RSP”), which is a qualified defined contribution plan. Any named executive officer who joined the Company after September 30, 2010, would not be eligible to participate in the PAP. However, in lieu thereof, he or she would receive a fixed annual Company contribution (“FAC”FACC”) which is equal to 4% of his or her eligible earnings.earnings to the RSP. Ms. Hartsfield and Mr. Robbins receive this FACC. See the discussion under“Retirement Savings Plan” on page 4846 for more information about this plan.

Mr. Cocklin, Mr. Haefner and Mr. Akers also participateparticipates in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), which provides retirement benefits (as well as supplemental disability and death benefits). Each of theseA named executive officersofficer who has participated in the plan for at least two years and who has attained the age of 55 is entitled to a lump sum payment. The lump sum payment is actuarially equivalent to an annual retirement supplementsupplemental pension in an amount that, when added to the annual retirement amount payable to him under the PAP, equals 60% of theirhis total cash compensation. The annual supplemental retirement amount will generally be equal to 60% of the sum of the amount of the participant’s last annual base salary and the amount of their last award under the Incentive Plan, subject to reductions for less than ten years of employment with the Company and for retirement prior to age 62.

Mr. Forsythe, Ms. Hartsfield, Mr. McDill, and Mr. ParkRobbins participate in the Account Balance SERP, which is anon-qualified defined contribution plan, thatunder which the Company currently provides an annual contribution of 25% of the participant’s total annual earnings (base salary and incentive payment under our Incentive Plan) into a notional supplemental retirement account, as well as provides supplemental disability and death benefits.

The HR Committee believes that these retirement benefits at the amounts provided to our named executive officers are an important component of total compensation and benefitsTotal Rewards and are required to ensure that our overall executive compensation package remains competitive with executive compensation packages offered by other major public companies in our industry. See the discussion under“Retirement Plans,” beginning on page 48,45, for more information on our retirement benefits.

Change in Control Severance Benefits.    We have severance agreements in place with each of our named executive officers to provide certain severance benefits for them in the event of the termination of their employment within three years following a “change in control” of the Company (as defined in the severance agreements and described generally in “Change in Control Severance Agreements,” beginning on page 50)48). The severance agreement for each named executive officer generally provides that the Company will pay such officer as severance pay in one lump sum an amount equal to (a) 2.5 times their total cash compensation (annual base salary and the higher of the last annual award under the Incentive Plan or the average of the three highest annual awards received under such plan) and (b) the total of (i) an amount that is actuarially equivalent to an additional three years of annual age and service credits payable to the officer under the PAP or the FACC, as applicable, and (ii) an amount that is actuarially equivalent to an additional three years of Company matching contributions payable to the officer under the RSP.

In addition, each named executive officer iswould be paid (i) an amount that is generally actuarially equivalent to an additional 36 months of health and welfare benefits and (ii) an amount that is actuarially equivalent to 36 months of accident and life insurance coverage, along with disability coverage. If the total of such lump sum severance payment results in the imposition of excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the IRC,Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), the named executive officer has the ability to elect to have the payment reduced to a level that will result in no payment of such excise tax. In lieu of reducing the severance payment under the agreement, each named executive officer may elect to have the Company pay the full severance payment amount, thereby leaving such officer responsible for personally paying the excise tax penalties imposed on such “excess parachute payments.”

The HR Committee believes that providing severance protection to our named executive officers following a change in control is a key component to ensuring that our executive compensation program remains competitive and that our named executive officers remain engaged before and during any potential change in control transaction.

38ATMOS ENERGY


Additional Information on Named Executive Officer Compensation

The compensation of our Past President and CEO, Mr. Haefner, was higher in fiscal 2019 than that of any of our other named executive officers primarily in recognition of Mr. Haefner’s level of responsibility and the competitive market data for chief executive officers ofcomparably-sized companies in our proxy peer group. However, Mr. Haefner

2020 Proxy Statement39


participated in all the same compensation plans as the other named executive officers and was subject to the same performance measurement determinations under our annual and long-term incentive compensation plans. We do not have any individual compensation policies or plans that are not applied consistently to all our named executive officers. Each year, we set our target opportunities in incentive compensation based solely upon competitive market conditions and the other factors discussed below.

In addition, in determining executive compensation, the HR Committee and our Board considered the results of our most recent shareholder advisory vote on executive

compensation at our February 6, 2019,9, 2022, meeting of shareholders. Our shareholders approved the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2018,2021, with over 95% of the shares voted in favor of such compensation. Accordingly, the HR Committee and our Board decided to continue to adhere to itspay-for-performance philosophy and did not materially change our executive compensation programs and policies over the last fiscal year as a result of the most recent shareholders’ advisory vote on executive compensation or otherwise. However, the HR Committee and Board will continue to review our executive compensation program each year and will consider the views of our shareholders and other developments during such review.

Competitive Executive Compensation Benchmarking

Like all major corporations, we operate in a competitive environment for talented executives. In August 2018, Pay GovernanceNovember 2021, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Pay Governance”Meridian”), ourthe HR Committee’s independent compensation consultant, through May 2019, provided ourthe HR Committee with a review of the compensation program elements and pay levels for companies similar to us and of comparable size as measured by financial measures and market capitalization for fiscal 2018.2021. The competitive compensation benchmarking data reviewed by the HR Committee included base salary, annual incentive compensation and long-term incentive compensation found in the proxy statements and other public filings filed by companies in the proxy peer group. The companies in the proxy peer group were selected because they represent those companies considered by the HR Committee to be the most comparable to the Company in terms of business operations, market capitalization and overall financial performance. The companies in the proxy peer group for the following fiscal year are selected annually by the HR Committee after its review of the recommendation of and presentation by its independent compensation consultant, which selection is then reviewed and approved by the Board. Below is our peer group for fiscal 2019. This2022, which remained the same proxyas the peer group was used in the stock performance graph appearing in our Annual Report on Form10-Kfor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019.2021.

 

Fiscal 20192022 Peer Group

Alliant Energy Corporation

  

  

NiSource Inc.

Ameren Corporation

  

  OGE Energy Corp.

Black Hills Corporation

ONE Gas, Inc.

CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

  

  

SpireSouthwest Gas Holdings, Inc.

CMS Energy Corporation

  

  Spire Inc.

Evergy, Inc.

WEC Energy Group, Inc.

DTE Energy Company

Xcel Energy Inc.

National Fuel Gas Company

  

  Xcel Energy Inc.

The annual revenues shown below for the companies in our proxy peer group are for the most recent fiscal year reported. The market capitalizations shown below are as of June 30, 2019.2022.

 

   

 

Revenues
($ Million)

  

 

    Market Cap.    

($ Million)

 

25th Percentile

   

 

 

 

2,033

 

   

 

 

 

4,772

 

 

50th Percentile

   

 

 

 

3,605

 

   

 

 

 

10,564

 

 

75th Percentile

   

 

 

 

5,657

 

   

 

 

 

14,530

 

 

Atmos Energy Corporation

   

 

 

 

2,902

 

   

 

 

 

12,349

 

40ATMOS ENERGY


   

 

Revenues
($ Million)

  

 

    Market Cap.    
($ Million)

25th Percentile

   

 

2,269

   

 

5,876

50th Percentile

   

 

4,630

   

 

13,334

75th Percentile

   

 

7,373

   

 

19,343

Atmos Energy Corporation

   

 

4,202

   

 

15,584

To supplement the executive compensation information derived from its study of the proxy peer group, the HR Committee also considered, on a limited basis, executive compensation benchmarking data from the latest Willis

2023 Proxy Statement39


Towers Watson U.S. CDB Energy Services Executive Compensation Survey (“energy services industry survey”) providedcompiled by Pay Governance.Meridian. The companies in this survey include companies in the natural gas, nuclear and electric utilities industries. To adjust for size differences, Pay GovernanceMeridian employed a statistical analysis (single regression) in the survey based on relative total annual revenues to determine competitive pay rates for our named executive officers based

upon the data derived from such survey. The HR Committee also reviewed compensation data from broader energy industry and general industry surveys providedcompiled by Pay Governance,Meridian, as a secondary reference point that reflects broader pay practices.

Using primarily the proxy peer group compensation analysis, as well as limited supplemental data from the energy services industry survey, the HR Committee reviewed competitive target compensation levels for each named executive officer at the 50th percentile level of the competitive market. For each named executive officer position, base salary, target total cash compensation (base salary plus annual incentive award) and target total direct compensation (base salary plus annual incentive award(target total cash compensation plus the annualized present value of long-term incentive compensation) were benchmarked and analyzed with reference to the Company’s desired competitive compensation positioning.

Independent Compensation Consultant

The HR Committee has been granted through its charter the sole authority from the Board for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the Company’sits independent compensation consultant. The HR Committee retained Pay Governance from October 2018 to May 2019 and Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) from May 2019 to present as its independent compensation consultant to assist with its responsibilities related to the Company’s compensation program for its named executive officers and non-employee directors. The HR Committee directed ourits independent compensation consultantsconsultant to (i) regularly attend meetings of the committee, (ii) conduct studies of competitive compensation practices and (iii) develop conclusions and recommendations related to the executive compensation plans of the Company for consideration by the committee. OurThe independent compensation consultantsconsultant assisted with (i) the identification of the Company’s proxy peer group, (ii) an assessment of competitive compensation fornon-employee directors of the Company, and (iii) a review of base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentive compensation opportunities of Company executive officers relative to competitive practices. OurThe independent compensation consultantsconsultant also advised the HR Committee on emerging trends and developments in executive compensation, provided recommendations regarding ourthe Company’s executive compensation strategy and performed an assessment of the risks contained in the Company’s incentive compensation plans.

OurThe independent compensation consultant attended all three HR Committee meetings held in fiscal 2019.2022. Based on policies and procedures implemented by the HR Committee and by ourits independent compensation consultants to ensure the objectivity and independence of the individual executive compensation consultants for Pay Governance and Meridian, the HR Committee believes that the consulting advice it received during the fiscal year from ourits consultants was objective, not influenced by any other relationships ourits consultants had with the Company and raised no conflicts of interest. In making this determination, the HR Committee also assessed the independence factors set forth in applicable SEC regulations and rules, NYSE corporate governance standards, and other facts and circumstances, and it concluded that the retention of Pay Governance, Meridian and each of theirits individual executive compensation consultants raised no conflicts of interest.

Management’s Role in Setting Named Executive Officer Compensation

The HR Committee and Mr. Haefner, our President and CEO during fiscal 2019,Akers met with representatives of Pay GovernanceMeridian at the beginning of fiscal 20192022 to review and discuss the compensation of all other named executive officers, except for Mr. Cocklin.officers. However, at no time did Mr. HaefnerAkers meet with representatives of Pay GovernanceMeridian or otherwise participate in HR Committee discussions regarding his own compensation. For fiscal 2019,2022, Mr. HaefnerAkers recommended to the HR Committee compensation for the other named executive officers, except for Mr. Cocklin, while Pay GovernanceMeridian provided to the HR Committee general guidance and competitive compensation data for Mr. Cocklin and Mr. Haefner.Akers.

2020 Proxy Statement41


Mr. Cocklin and Mr. HaefnerAkers may be present during a portion of the HR Committee’s meetings on executive compensation. However, both Mr. Cocklin and Mr. HaefnerAkers (along with any other named executive officers in attendance at HR Committee meetings), are excused when the compensation of such named executive officers is discussed and decisions regarding their compensation are reached by the HR Committee. All decisions by the HR Committee concerning all forms of executive compensation to be paid to the Executive Chairman, the President and CEO and the other named executive officers are approved by the Board.

Limitation on Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 162(m) limits the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid to any one single covered employee in any calendar year. Under the tax rules in effect before 2018, compensation paid to certain named executive officers that qualified as “performance-based” under Section 162(m) was deductible without regard to this $1 million limit. However, the TCJA, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017, eliminated this performance-based compensation exception, effective January 1, 2018, subject to a special rule that “grandfathers” certain awards and arrangements that were in effect on or before November 2, 2017. From and after January 1, 2018, compensation awarded in excess of $1 million to our named executive officers generally will not be deductible. However, the HR Committee will, consistent with its past practice, continue to retain flexibility to design compensation programs that are in the best long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders, with deductibility of compensation being only one of a variety of considerations taken into account.

CEO Transition

In August 2019, consistent with the long-term leadership succession plan conducted by the Board, the Company announced that J. Kevin Akers, Executive Vice President, would assume the role of President and Chief Executive Officer, effective October 1, 2019. Michael E. Haefner will remain an employee of the Company through his anticipated date of retirement, January 2, 2020. Kim R. Cocklin will remain Executive Chairman of the Board. In connection with this transition, for fiscal 2020, the Board increased Mr. Akers’s base salary from $475,000 to $850,000, increased his target annual bonus to 100% of his base salary, and increased his long-term incentive award target. The Board also increased Mr. Cocklin’s base salary from $700,000 to $850,000 for fiscal 2020. In setting the fiscal 2020 compensation for Mr. Akers and Mr. Cocklin, the HR Committee followed the same objectives and strategy and used the same benchmarking process as discussed in “Executive Compensation Program Objectives and Strategy” and “Competitive Executive Compensation Benchmarking” above.

 

4240 ATMOS ENERGY 


NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Summary of Cash and Other Compensation

The following table provides information concerning compensation we paid to or accrued on behalf of our Principal Executive Officer, our Principal Financial Officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers serving as such on September 30, 2019:2022:

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019(a)2022(a)

 

Name and Principal Position

 

 

Year

 

 

Salary
($)

 

 

Stock
Awards
($)(b)

 

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(c)

 

 

 

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(d)

 

 

All Other
Compensation
($)(e)

 

 

Total
($)

 

  

 

Kim R. Cocklin(f)

  

 

 

 

2019

 

  

 

 

 

740,962

 

  

 

 

 

2,923,804

 

  

 

 

 

740,943

 

  

 

 

 

1,456,531

 

  

 

 

 

15,194

 

  

 

 

 

5,877,434

 

  

Executive Chairman

of the Board

   2018   852,972   2,627,833   852,950   —     11,865   4,345,620  
   

 

2017

 

 

   

 

996,640

 

 

   

 

2,706,818

 

 

   

 

934,350

 

 

   

 

—  

 

 

   

 

18,892

 

 

   

 

4,656,700

 

 

  

 

Michael E. Haefner(g)

  

 

 

 

2019

 

  

 

 

 

941,088

 

  

 

 

 

2,627,330

 

  

 

 

 

1,254,456

 

  

 

 

 

5,560,898

 

  

 

 

 

12,221

 

  

 

 

 

10,395,993

 

  

Past President and Chief

Executive Officer

   2018   845,577   2,624,913   845,556   6,656,527   17,265   10,989,838  
   

 

2017

 

 

   

 

593,077

 

 

   

 

1,233,019

 

 

   

 

472,608

 

 

   

 

2,599,360

 

 

   

 

11,997

 

 

   

 

4,910,061

 

 

  

 

J. Kevin Akers(h)

  

 

 

 

2019

 

  

 

 

 

463,435

 

  

 

 

 

809,197

 

  

 

 

 

401,633

 

  

 

 

 

6,169,053

 

  

 

 

 

12,221

 

  

 

 

 

7,855,539

 

  

President and Chief

Executive Officer

   2018   373,154   520,080   298,516   532,993   11,867   1,736,610  
   

 

2017

 

 

   

 

332,049

 

 

   

 

408,949

 

 

   

 

228,284

 

 

   

 

1,227,607

 

 

   

 

11,923

 

 

   

 

2,208,812

 

 

  

 

Christopher T. Forsythe(i)

  

 

 

 

2019

 

  

 

 

 

434,639

 

  

 

 

 

809,197

 

  

 

 

 

376,678

 

  

 

 

 

342,141

 

  

 

 

 

198,620

 

  

 

 

 

2,161,275

 

  

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

   2018   388,702   520,080   310,954   179,097   168,205   1,567,038  
   

 

2017

 

 

   

 

344,231

 

 

   

 

408,949

 

 

   

 

236,659

 

 

   

 

137,057

 

 

   

 

103,213

 

 

   

 

1,230,109

 

 

  

 

David J. Park(j)

  

 

 

 

2019

 

  

 

 

 

412,165

 

  

 

 

 

591,021

 

  

 

 

 

329,724

 

  

 

 

 

321,174

 

  

 

 

 

194,521

 

  

 

 

 

1,848,605

 

  

Senior Vice President,

Utility Operations

   2018   373,154   520,080   298,516   173,678   161,094   1,526,522  
   

 

2017

 

 

   

 

321,328

 

 

   

 

541,574

 

 

   

 

110,457

 

 

   

 

130,361

 

 

   

 

98,328

 

 

   

 

1,202,048

 

 

  

Name and Principal Position

 

  

Year

 

   

Salary
($)

 

   

Stock
Awards
($)(b)

 

   

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(c)

 

   

 

Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(d)

 

   

All Other
Compensation
($)(e)

 

  

Total
($)

 

 

J. Kevin Akers(f)

  

 

 

 

2022

 

 

   976,923    2,523,433    1,325,782    —      13,424   4,839,562 

President and Chief Executive Officer

   2021    900,077    2,957,744    900,077    1,696,678    12,738   6,467,314 
   2020    841,346    2,366,076    841,346    5,765,795    12,096   9,826,659 

 

Christopher T. Forsythe(g)

   2022    510,631    776,964    450,435    —      221,069   1,959,099 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

   2021    492,231    910,712    319,950    86,730    212,622   2,022,245 
   2020    472,777    728,494    307,305    64,333    224,460   1,797,369 

 

Karen E. Hartsfield(h)

   2022    452,523    567,433    368,471    35,537    205,901   1,629,865 

Senior Vice President,

General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary

   2021    434,308    665,441    260,585    26,163    196,296   1,582,793 
   2020    407,539    532,597    244,523    17,445    199,252   1,401,356 
  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John S. McDill(i)

   2022    437,096    567,433    355,910    —      178,935   1,539,374 

Senior Vice President, Utility Operations

             

 

J. Matt Robbins(j)

   2022    341,523    567,433    278,089    34,786    163,076   1,384,907 

Senior Vice President, Human Resources

   2021    328,437    665,441    197,062    27,325    154,010   1,372,275 

 

(a)

No bonuses,bonus amounts, as defined by applicable SEC rules and regulations, were paid or stock options awarded to any named executive officers in fiscal years 2019, 20182022, 2021 or 2017.2020.

 

2023 Proxy Statement41


(b)

In accordance with applicable SEC rules, the valuation of stock awards in this table is based upon the grant date fair value of time-lapse RSUs granted during fiscal 2017-2019,2020-2022, along with performance-based RSUs granted during fiscal 2017-2019.2020-2022. The stock awards are valued at the grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 excluding any estimate of forfeitures related to service vesting conditions. Amounts in this column also include the fair value of awards, granted early in the following fiscal year, of time-lapse RSUs with respect to the portion of each fiscal year’s annual incentives elected by the named executive officer to be received in time-lapse RSUs in lieu of cash as well as the 20% premium granted in connection with such time-lapse RSUs. These units vest three years following the date of grant. For more information on these elections see footnote (c) below. The values for Mr. Haefner reflect the full grant date fair value of the performance-based RSUs awarded in accordance with SEC requirements, but due to his upcoming retirement on January 2, 2020, Mr. Haefner will only be entitled to a pro-rata portion of the performance-based RSUs at the end of the three-year performance period based on actual performance and his period of employment prior to retirement. The fair value of the performance-based RSUs on the grant date are shown in the following table at their maximum value, assuming the highest level of performance conditions (200% of the target) will be achieved during the performance period.

 

2020 Proxy Statement43


Name

  

Year

 

   

 

Stock
Awards
($)

 

   Year   

 

Stock
Awards
($)

 

 

Kim R. Cocklin

  

 

 

 

2019

 

 

  

 

 

 

2,627,330

 

 

   2018    2,286,618 
   

 

2017

 

 

 

   

 

2,333,034

 

 

 

Michael E. Haefner

  

 

 

 

2019

 

 

  

 

 

 

2,627,330

 

 

   2018    2,286,618 
   

 

2017

 

 

 

   

 

1,043,832

 

 

 

J. Kevin Akers

  

 

 

 

2019

 

 

  

 

 

 

809,197

 

 

  

 

2022

 

  

 

3,785,149

 

   2018    520,080   

 

2021

 

  

 

2,957,744

 

   

 

2017

 

 

 

   

 

408,949

 

 

 

  

 

2020

 

  

 

2,366,076

 

Christopher T. Forsythe

  

 

 

 

2019

 

 

  

 

 

 

809,197

 

 

  

 

2022

 

  

 

1,165,445

 

   2018    520,080   

 

2021

 

  

 

910,712

 

   

 

2017

 

 

 

   

 

408,949

 

 

 

  

 

2020

 

  

 

728,494

 

David J. Park

  

 

 

 

2019

 

 

  

 

 

 

591,021

 

 

Karen E. Hartsfield

  

 

2022

 

  

 

851,149

 

   2018    520,080   

 

2021

 

  

 

665,441

 

   

 

2017

 

 

 

   

 

408,949

 

 

 

  

 

2020

 

  

 

532,597

 

John S. McDill

  

 

2022

  

 

851,149

 

J. Matt Robbins

  

 

2022

 

  

 

851,149

 

  

 

2021

 

  

 

665,441

 

 

(c)

The amounts shown for fiscal 20192022 reflect the cash payments attributable to performance achieved at the level of 133%136% of target EPS in fiscal 20192022 under our Incentive Plan. For a discussion of the performance criteria established by our HR Committee for awards in fiscal 20192022 under our Incentive Plan, see “Elements of Executive Compensation,” beginning on page 35.34. Awards under the Incentive Plan are generally paid in cash and are based on the participant’s eligible earnings received during the fiscal year. However, participants may elect prior to the beginning of each fiscal year to convert all or a portion of their awards to time-lapse RSUs, with a premium equal to 20% of the amount converted, with such units being awarded under our LTIP. Each named executive officer’s conversion electionsofficer elected to receive 100% cash for the 2019his or her fiscal 2022 Incentive Plan awards are reflected in the table below.award.

Name

 

  

Incentive
Plan
Award
($)

 

   

Cash
(%)

 

   

Amount
($)

 

   

 

Restricted
Stock
Units
Elected
(%)

 

   

 

Value of
Restricted
Stock
Units
($)

 

   

Units
(#)

 

 

Kim R. Cocklin

   987,924    75    740,943    25    246,981    2,279 

Michael E. Haefner

   1,254,456    100    1,254,456    0   

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

J. Kevin Akers

   401,633    100    401,633    0   

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

Christopher T. Forsythe

   376,678    100    376,678    0   

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

David J. Park

   329,724    100    329,724    0   

 

—  

 

  

 

—  

 

 

(d)

The amounts shown reflect (i) above-market interest earned on the Account Balance Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, including above-market interest for Mr. Forsythe ($5,910)34,328), Ms. Hartsfield ($19,094), Mr. McDill ($12,102) and Mr. ParkRobbins ($4,209)18,690), and (ii) the aggregate current year increase in pension values for each named executive officer based on the change in the present value of the benefit as presented in the “Retirement Plans Tables,” beginning on page 49.46. The present value is based on the earliest age for which an unreduced benefit is available and assumptions from the September 30, 2018,2021, and September 30, 2019,2022, measurement dates. The above-market interest is also included in the amounts shown in the “Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year” column of the “Non-Qualified“Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2019”2022” on page 50.47. The change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings for Mr. Akers, Mr. Forsythe, and Mr. McDill was negative, therefore it is reported at $0.

 

(e)

The components of “All Other Compensation” are reflected in the table below.

 

(f)

Mr. Cocklin was appointed as Executive Chairman of the Board by the Board of Directors, effective October 1, 2017.

(g)

Mr. Haefner was appointed as Past President and Chief Executive Officer by the Board of Directors, effective October 1, 2019. Mr. Haefner plans to retire from the Company January 2, 2020.

(h)

Mr. Akers was appointed as President and Chief Executive Officer by the Board of Directors, effective October 1, 2019.

 

(i)(g)

Mr. Forsythe was appointed as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer by the Board of Directors, effective February 1, 2017.

 

(j)(h)

Ms. Hartsfield was appointed as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary, effective August 7, 2017.

(i)

Mr. ParkMcDill was appointed as Senior Vice President, Utility Operations, effective October 1, 2021. Mr. McDill was not a named executive officer until the 2022 fiscal year.

(j)

Mr. Robbins was appointed as Senior Vice President, Human Resources, effective January 1, 2017. Mr. Robbins was not a named executive officer until the 2021 fiscal year.

 

4442 ATMOS ENERGY 


All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year 20192022

 

Name

  

Company
Contributions
to Retirement
Savings Plan
($)

 

  

Company
Contributions
to Account
Balance
SERP
($)(a)

 

  

 

Cost of
Premiums for
Company-
Paid
Term Life
Insurance
($)

 

  

Financial
Planning
($)(b)

 

   

Perquisites
($)(c)

 

  

    Total    

($)

 

   

Company
Contributions
to Retirement
Savings Plan
($)(a)

 

   

Company
Contributions
to Account
Balance
SERP
($)

 

   

 

Cost of
Premiums for
Company-
Paid
Term Life
Insurance
($)

 

   

Financial
Planning
($)(b)

 

   

Perquisites
($)(c)

 

   

    Total    

($)

 

 

Kim R. Cocklin

  

11,154

  

      —  

  

1,067

  

 

2,973

 

  

      —  

  

 

15,194

 

Michael E. Haefner

  

11,154

  

      —  

  

1,067

  

 

      —  

 

  

      —  

  

 

12,221

 

J. Kevin Akers

  

11,154

  

      —  

  

1,067

  

 

      —  

 

  

      —  

  

 

12,221

 

  

 

12,038

 

  

 

      —  

 

  

 

1,386

 

  

 

      —  

 

  

 

      —  

 

  

 

13,424

 

Christopher T. Forsythe

  

11,154

  

186,399

  

1,067

  

 

      —  

 

  

      —  

  

 

198,620

 

  

 

12,038

 

  

 

207,645

 

  

 

1,386

 

  

 

      —  

 

  

 

      —  

 

  

 

221,069

 

David J. Park

  

11,154

  

177,670

  

1,067

  

 

4,630

 

  

      —  

  

 

194,521

 

Karen E. Hartsfield

  

 

24,238

 

  

 

178,277

 

  

 

1,386

 

  

 

2,000

 

  

 

      —  

 

  

 

205,901

 

John S. McDill

  

 

12,038

 

  

 

165,511

 

  

 

1,386

 

  

 

      —  

 

  

 

      —  

 

  

 

178,935

 

J. Matt Robbins

  

 

24,024

 

  

 

134,646

 

  

 

1,354

 

  

 

3,052

 

  

 

      —  

 

  

 

163,076

 

 

(a)

The All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table has been updated for Mr. ForsytheMs. Hartsfield and Mr. Park for years 2018 and 2017Robbins’s company contributions to reflect these amounts not previously included.the RSP include the FACC.

 

(b)

We provide financial planning services to our named executive officers, which benefit is valued at the actual charge for the services.

 

(c)

No named executive officer received perquisites and other personal benefits with an aggregate value equal to or exceeding $10,000 during fiscal 2019.2022.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table shows the grants of executive compensationequity and incentive plan-based awards to the named executive officers during fiscal 2019 and the portion of fiscal 2019 awards under the Incentive Plan elected to be received in time-lapse RSUs:2022:

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2019(a)2022(a)

 

    

 

Estimated Future Payouts
UnderNon-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(b)

 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(c)
 

 

All Other
Stock Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or Units
(#)

 

 

   Grant Date   

Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
($)

 

Name

 

 

Grant

Date

 

 

Threshold
($)

 

 

Target
($)

 

 

Maximum
($)

 

 

Threshold
(#)

 

 

Target
(#)

 

 

Maximum
(#)

 

Kim R. Cocklin

                  

Incentive Plan

  

 

10/1/18

  

 

277,861

  

 

555,722

  

 

1,111,444

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

Time-Lapse RSUs

  

 

05/7/19

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

12,825

  

 

1,313,665

Performance-Based RSUs

  

 

05/7/19

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

6,413

  

 

12,825

  

 

25,650

  

 

—  

  

 

1,313,665

Time-Lapse RSUs

   11/5/19   —     —     —    

 

—  

  

 

2,735

(d)

  

 

—  

   —    

 

296,474

Michael E. Haefner

                  

Incentive Plan

  

 

10/1/18

  

 

470,544

  

 

941,088

  

 

1,882,176

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

Time-Lapse RSUs

  

 

05/7/19

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

12,825

  

 

1,313,665

Performance-Based RSUs

  

 

05/7/19

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

6,413

  

 

12,825

  

 

25,650

  

 

—  

  

 

1,313,665

J. Kevin Akers

                  

Incentive Plan

  

 

10/1/18

  

 

150,617

  

 

301,233

  

 

602,466

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

Time-Lapse RSUs

  

 

05/7/19

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

3,950

  

 

404,599

Performance-Based RSUs

  

 

05/7/19

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

1,975

  

 

3,950

  

 

7,900

  

 

—  

  

 

404,599

Christopher T. Forsythe

                  

Incentive Plan

  

 

10/1/18

  

 

141,258

  

 

282,516

  

 

565,032

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

Time-Lapse RSUs

  

 

05/7/19

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

3,950

  

 

404,599

Performance-Based RSUs

  

 

05/7/19

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

1,975

  

 

3,950

  

 

7,900

  

 

—  

  

 

404,599

David J. Park

                  

Incentive Plan

  

 

10/1/18

  

 

123,650

  

 

247,299

  

 

494,598

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

Time-Lapse RSUs

  

 

05/7/19

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

2,885

  

 

295,511

Performance-Based RSUs

  

 

05/7/19

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

—  

  

 

1,443

  

 

2,885

  

 

5,770

  

 

—  

  

 

295,511

2020 Proxy Statement45


     

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(b)

  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(c)
  

 

All Other
Stock Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or Units
(#)(d)

 

  

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
($)

 

 

Name

 

 

Grant

Date

  

Threshold
($)

 

  

Target
($)

 

  

Maximum
($)

 

  

Threshold
(#)

 

  

Target
(#)

 

  

Maximum
(#)

 

 

J. Kevin Akers

         

Incentive Plan

 

 

10/01/21

 

 

 

488,462

 

 

 

976,924

 

 

 

1,953,848

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

Time-Lapse RSUs

 

 

05/03/22

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

11,140

 

 

 

1,261,716

 

Performance-Based RSUs

 

 

05/03/22

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

5,570

 

 

 

11,140

 

 

 

22,280

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

1,261,716

 

Christopher T. Forsythe

         

Incentive Plan

 

 

10/01/21

 

 

 

165,955

 

 

 

331,910

 

 

 

663,820

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

Time-Lapse RSUs

 

 

05/03/22

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

3,430

 

 

 

388,482

 

Performance-Based RSUs

 

 

05/03/22

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

1,715

 

 

 

3,430

 

 

 

6,860

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

388,482

 

Karen E. Hartsfield

         

Incentive Plan

 

 

10/01/21

 

 

 

135,757

 

 

 

271,514

 

 

 

543,028

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

Time-Lapse RSUs

 

 

05/03/22

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

2,505

 

 

 

283,716

 

Performance-Based RSUs

 

 

05/03/22

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

1,253

 

 

 

2,505

 

 

 

5,010

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

283,716

 

John S. McDill

         

Incentive Plan

 

 

10/01/21

 

 

 

131,129

 

 

 

262,258

 

 

 

524,516

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

Time-Lapse RSUs

 

 

05/03/22

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

2,505

 

 

 

283,716

 

Performance-Based RSUs

 

 

05/03/22

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

1,253

 

 

 

2,505

 

 

 

5,010

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

283,716

 

J. Matt Robbins

         

Incentive Plan

 

 

10/01/21

 

 

 

102,457

 

 

 

204,914

 

 

 

409,828

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

Time-Lapse RSUs

 

 

05/03/22

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

2,505

 

 

 

283,716

 

Performance-Based RSUs

 

 

05/03/22

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

1,253

 

 

 

2,505

 

 

 

5,010

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

283,716

 

 

(a)

No stock options were awarded to any named executive officer in fiscal 2019.2022.

 

2023 Proxy Statement43


(b)

The amounts reflect the estimated payments which could have been made under our Incentive Plan, based upon the participant’s annual salary as of the date presented.and target bonus opportunity. The plan provides that our named executive officers may receive annual cash incentive awards based on the performance and profitability of the Company. The HR Committee establishes annual target awards for each such officer. The actual amounts received by the named executive officers in fiscal 20192022 under the plan are set forth under the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column in the “Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 20192022,” beginning on page 43.41.

 

(c)

The amounts reflect the performance-based RSUs granted under our LTIP, which vest three years from the beginning of the performance measurement period (October 1, 2018)2021), at which time the holder is entitled to receive a percentage of the performance-based RSUs granted, based on our cumulative EPS performance over the period October 1, 20182021 to September 30, 2021,2024, payable in shares of our common stock, plus dividend equivalents payable in stock or cash. The grant date fair market value on May 7, 20193, 2022 of $102.43$113.26 is reflected at the target level of performance.

 

(d)

These awardsThe amounts reflect the portion of fiscal 2019 Incentive Plan awards that was elected to be received in time-lapse RSUs granted under our LTIP, as well as the 20% value premium received pursuant to such election. Such RSUs were granted at the fair market value of $108.40 onwhich vest three years from the date of grant on November 5, 2019.grant.

Outstanding Equity Awards

The following table shows the outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers at September 30, 2019:2022:

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 FiscalYear-End for 2019(a)

 

 

 

Stock Awards

   

 

Stock Awards

   

Name

 

Number of Shares
of Stock or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#) (b)

 

 

Market Value of
Shares of Stock
or Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($) (c)

 

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number
of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not Vested
(#) (d)

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares, Units or  

Other Rights That
Have Not Vested
($) (c)

 

   

Number of Shares
of Stock or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#) (a)

 

 

Market Value of
Shares of Stock
or Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($) (b)

 

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number
of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have Not Vested
(#) (c)

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares, Units or
Other Rights That
Have Not Vested
($) (b)

 

   

Kim R. Cocklin

 

 

52,764

 

 

6,009,292

 

 

26,015

 

 

2,962,848

 

Michael E. Haefner

 

 

38,196

 

 

4,350,142

 

 

26,015

 

 

2,962,848

 

J. Kevin Akers

 

 

9,475

 

 

1,079,108

 

 

6,950

 

 

791,536

  

 

37,025

 

 

 

3,770,996

 

 

 

50,860

 

 

 

5,180,091

 

 

Christopher T. Forsythe

 

 

9,475

 

 

1,079,108

 

 

6,950

 

 

791,536

  

 

11,400

 

 

 

1,161,090

 

 

 

15,660

 

 

 

1,594,971

 

 

David J. Park

 

 

10,356

 

 

1,179,445

 

 

5,885

 

 

670,243

 

Karen E. Hartsfield

 

 

8,330

 

 

 

848,411

 

 

 

11,440

 

 

 

1,165,164

 

 

John S. McDill

 

 

5,405

 

 

 

550,499

 

 

 

8,210

 

 

 

836,189

 

 

J. Matt Robbins

 

 

8,330

 

 

 

848,411

 

 

 

11,440

 

 

 

1,165,164

 

 

 

(a)

This table does not include amounts of time-lapse RSUs that were granted in November 2019 as a result of elections by the named executive officers to convert all or a portion of incentive compensation attributable to fiscal 2019. However, it does include amounts of time-lapse RSUs that were granted in November 2018 as a result of elections by the named executive officers to convert all or a portion of their incentive compensation attributable to fiscal 2018.

(b)

Represents time-lapse RSUs, which generally vest three years from the date of grant, as reflected in the next table.

 

(c)(b)

Market value is based on the closing price of our common stock of $113.89,$101.85, as reported on the NYSE Consolidated Tape on September 30, 2019.2022.

 

(d)(c)

Represents performance-based RSUs.RSUs, assuming maximum level of performance. See footnote (c) to the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 20192022” table on page 4543 for a discussion of the vesting terms of our performance-based RSUs. Based on our performance through September 30, 2019,2022, performance-based RSUs, at the target level of performance, will vest as indicated in the “Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Vesting Schedule” on page 4745 below.

46ATMOS ENERGY


Time-Lapse Restricted Stock Units Vesting Schedule(a)Schedule

 

Name

  11-08-19(b)   5-02-20(c)   11-07-20(b)   5-01-21(c)   11-06-21(b)   5-07-22(c)   Total   

05-05-23(a)

   

05-04-24(a)

   

05-03-25(a)

   

Total

 

Kim R. Cocklin

   4,485    14,405    4,236    13,190    3,623    12,825    52,764 

Michael E. Haefner

   —      6,445    2,144    13,190    3,592    12,825    38,196 

J. Kevin Akers

   —      2,525    —      3,000    —      3,950    9,475   

 

11,595

 

  

 

14,290

 

  

 

11,140

 

  

 

37,025

 

Christopher T. Forsythe

   —      2,525    —      3,000    —      3,950    9,475   

 

3,570

 

  

 

4,400

 

  

 

3,430

 

  

 

11,400

 

David J. Park

   443    2,525    1,503    3,000    —      2,885    10,356 

Karen E. Hartsfield

  

 

2,610

 

  

 

3,215

 

  

 

2,505

 

  

 

8,330

 

John S. McDill

  

 

1,300

 

  

 

1,600

 

  

 

2,505

 

  

 

5,405

 

J. Matt Robbins

  

 

2,610

 

  

 

3,215

 

  

 

2,505

 

  

 

8,330

 

 

(a)

This table does not include amounts of time-lapse RSUs that were granted in November 2019 as a result of elections by the named executive officers to convert all or a portion of incentive compensation received for fiscal 2019.

(b)

The amounts represent time-lapse RSUs granted under our LTIP as a result of the participant’s election to convert all or a portion of his Incentive Plan payment attributable to prior fiscal years.

(c)

The amounts represent time-lapse RSUs granted under our LTIP, which vest three years from the date of grant.

44ATMOS ENERGY


Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Vesting Schedule(a)

 

Name

  9-30-20   9-30-21   Total   09-30-23   09-30-24   Total 

Kim R. Cocklin

   13,190    12,825    26,015 

Michael E. Haefner

   13,190    12,825    26,015 

J. Kevin Akers

   3,000    3,950    6,950    14,290    11,140    25,430 

Christopher T. Forsythe

   3,000    3,950    6,950    4,400    3,430    7,830 

David J. Park

   3,000    2,885    5,885 

Karen E. Hartsfield

   3,215    2,505    5,720 

John S. McDill

   1,600    2,505    4,105 

J. Matt Robbins

   3,215    2,505    5,720 

 

(a)

The amounts represent performance-based RSUs, assuming the target level of performance, which vest at the end of each applicable three-fiscal year performance period. Although these units vest at the dates indicated in the column heading, they are not available for distribution in the form of shares until the number of units earned based on the cumulative EPS amount for the performance period, along with dividend equivalents for the performance period payable in the form of cash or additional units, is finally determined and approved by the Board at its November meeting each year.

Vested Common Stock

The following table sets forth the vested common stock receivedawards held by the named executive officers that vested during fiscal 2019:2022:

Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 2019     2022

 

  Stock Awards (a)   Stock Awards (a) 

Name

  

Stock
Awards
(#) (b)

   

Value
Realized on
Vesting
($) (c)

   Stock
Awards
(#) (b)
   Value
Realized on
Vesting
($) (c)
 

Kim R. Cocklin

   44,167    4,595,200 

Michael E. Haefner

   24,716    2,512,845 

J. Kevin Akers

   4,763    510,527    15,545    1,663,629 

Christopher T. Forsythe

   4,763    510,527    7,520    824,776 

David J. Park

   5,893    614,725 

Karen E. Hartsfield

   5,495    602,665 

John S. McDill

   2,902    310,892 

J. Matt Robbins

   
5,495
 
   
602,665
 

 

(a)

The named executive officers elected to have vested shares withheld, in each case, to cover applicable state and federal taxes incurred, upon receipt of their vested shares. The amounts reflected in this column are not reduced for the shares withheld.

 

(b)

Includes shares that vested during fiscal 20192022 attributable to time-lapse RSUs as well as performance-based RSUs at the 150%target level of performance for the fiscal2017-192020-2022 performance period.

 

(c)

The value receivedrealized on vesting represents the fair market value of the shares received on the following dates: $92.21$114.33 on May 7, 2022 and $104.53 on November 2, 2018; $102.47 on May 3, 2019; and $108.40 on November 5, 2019.8, 2022.

2020 Proxy Statement47


Retirement Plans

Pension Account Plan.    Mr. Akers, Mr. Forsythe, and Mr. McDill participate in the Company’s PAP. Our PAP is a qualified, cash balance defined benefit pension plan under both the IRC and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”). The plan covers a majority of our employees, including all our named executive officers. Benefits under this plan become vested andnon-forfeitable after completion of three years of continuous employment. Under the terms of the PAP, a vested participant receives a benefit based on the value of the cash balance account at termination or retirement from the Company. Benefits payable under the PAP are not offset by Social Security benefits. Under the IRC, the annual compensation of each employee to be considered under our retirement plan for 20192022 cannot exceed $280,000.$305,000.

The amount of eligible earnings utilized under the PAP generally includes base salary earned, deferrals to the RSP and IRC Section 125 (“cafeteria plan”) reductions, while it excludes (i) any imputed income attributable primarily to Company-provided life insurance or financial planning services and (ii) all incentive compensation, as well as expense

2023 Proxy Statement45


reimbursements. All participants may choose to receive their account balances in the form of a lump sum or an annuity. For any named executive officer who retires with vested benefits under the plan, the compensation shown as “Salary” in the “Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 20192022,” beginning on page 43,41, would be considered eligible compensationearnings in determining benefits, subject to applicable limitations under the IRC.

Retirement Savings Plan.    The RSP is a qualified, defined contribution plan, which is intended to comply with Section 404(c) of ERISA. All employees are eligible to participate in the RSP immediately upon joining the Company. Investments may be made in shares of Company common stock or in a variety of other equity and fixed income investments offered by the RSP administrator. Employees may makepre-tax contributions to the RSP based on the amount of eligible earnings, which is composed generally of base salary, earned,pre-tax contributions to the RSP and cafeteria plan reductions, but excludes (i) any imputed income attributable primarily to Company-provided life insurance or financial planning services and (ii) all incentive compensation, as well as expense reimbursements. Upon the completion of one year of employment, theThe Company matches a participant’s contribution up to 4% of eligible earnings. Effective January 1, 2011, the RSP was amended toThe Company also includeincludes a FAC contribution,FACC, which is equal to 4% of eligible earnings for all participants in the RSP who joined the Company after September 30, 2010, when new employees ceased to be eligible to participate in the PAP. Eligible participants begin receiving the FAC contributionFACC after one year of employment. Ms. Hartsfield and Mr. Robbins each received such a contribution in fiscal 2022. All participants are immediately vested in their contributions to the RSP and matching Company contributions. Participants are vested in the FAC contributionsFACC component of their RSP account balances after three continuous years of employment.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans.    Mr. Cocklin, Mr. Haefner and Mr. Akers participateparticipates in the Company’s SERP, which provides retirement benefits (as well as supplemental disability and death benefits) to certain officers. The SERP provides that an officer who has participated in the SERP for at least two years and has attained age 55 is entitled to a lump sum payment. The lump sum payment is actuarially equivalent to an annual supplemental pension in an amount that, when added to their annual pension payable under the PAP, equals 60% of their compensation, subject to reductions for less than ten years of employment at the Company and for retirement prior to age 62. The SERP covers compensation in an amount equal to the sum of (a) the greater of the participant’s annual base salary at the date of termination of employment or the average of the participant’s annual base salary for the highest of three calendar years (whether or not consecutive) of employment with the Company and (b) the greater of the amount of the participant’s last award under any of the Company’s annual performance bonus or incentive plans or the average of the participant’s highest three performance awards under such plans (whether or not consecutive). The amount of current compensation covered by the SERP at the end of fiscal 20192022 for the following named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table is as follows: Mr. Cocklin, $2,284,653; Mr. Haefner, $2,229,456 and Mr. Akers $1,251,633.is $2,375,782.

Mr. Forsythe, Ms. Hartsfield, Mr. McDill, and Mr. ParkRobbins participate in the Account Balance SERP, which is anon-qualified defined contributionaccount based plan that provides an annual contribution of 25%, which percentage is established by the Board of Directors for participants who are members of the Company’s Management Committee, of the participant’s total annual earnings (base salary and incentive payment under our Annual Incentive Plan) into a notional supplemental retirement account. Since it was adopted in August 2009, theThe Account Balance SERP has beenis open only to any employeeemployees of the Company selected by the Board, in its discretion, to participate in the plan. In addition to receiving an annual pay credit at the end of each

48ATMOS ENERGY


calendar year in their account balance equal to a percentage of each participant’s total annual earnings, each participant receives an interest credit to participant’s account balance at the end of each plan year. A participant is eligible to receive a distribution of their supplemental benefit under the plan upon retirement, which is defined as a voluntary termination from employment with the Company that constitutes a separation from service after hethe participant has completed at least three (3) years of participation in the plan and has attained age 55.

Retirement Plans Tables

The tables below show the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of the named executive officers under our PAP, RSP and SERP or Account Balance SERP, as applicable, along with the total amount of payments made during fiscal 2019 under the SERP.applicable. See the discussion under “Pension Account Plan” on page 48,45, and “Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans,” beginning on page 48,46, for more information on these plans. As discussed above under “Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans,” each of the named executive officers will receive a benefit under both the PAP and the SERP or Account Balance SERP, the present values of which are presented in the tables below.

46ATMOS ENERGY


Pension Benefits Table for Fiscal Year 20192022

 

Retirement age:  

(a) 65, or current age if later, for the PAP

(b) 62, or current age if later, for the

SERP

Discount Rate:Rates:  3.29%
Pension Account Plan5.66%
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan5.71%
Postretirement mortality:  
Annuities:Pri-2012 White Collar Annuitant Table Projected Generationally from 2012 using Scale MP-2021
Lump Sums:Use of the applicable mortality table, for 2019,
as defined in IRC Section 417(e)(3)

 

Name

 Plan Name Number of
Years
Credited
Service
(#)
  Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit ($)
  Payments
During
Last Fiscal
Year ($)
 

Kim R. Cocklin(a)

 Pension Account Plan  13.33   391,321   —         

 

 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  13.33   20,040,698   —         

Michael E. Haefner(b)

 Pension Account Plan  11.25   338,575   —         
 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  11.25   20,832,447   —         

J. Kevin Akers(b)

 Pension Account Plan  28.08   784,336   —         

 

 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  16.83   10,146,098   —         

Christopher T. Forsythe(c)

 Pension Account Plan  16.27   376,365   —         

David J. Park(c)

 Pension Account Plan  25.70   343,551   —         

Name

 Plan Name 

Number of

Years

Credited

Service

(#)

  

Present

Value of

Accumulated

Benefit ($)

  

Payments

During

Last Fiscal

Year ($)

 

J. Kevin Akers(a)

 Pension Account Plan  31.08   704,959   —         

 

 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  19.83   16,488,114   —         

Christopher T. Forsythe(b)

 Pension Account Plan  19.27   307,498   —         

John S. McDill(b)

 Pension Account Plan  35.45   525,877   —         

 

(a)

Mr. CocklinAkers is eligible for retirement with an immediate PAP benefit and a full benefit under the SERP.

(b)

Mr. Haefner and Mr. Akers are eligible for early retirement with an immediate PAP benefit and a reduced benefit under the SERP.

 

(c)(b)

Mr. Forsythe and Mr. Park areMcDill were eligible for early commencement of an immediate PAP benefit.benefit as of September 30, 2022.

2020 Proxy Statement49Non-Qualified


Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 20192022

 

Name

 Plan Name Executive
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year
 Company
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year(a)
 

Aggregate

Earnings

in Last

Fiscal Year(b)

 

Aggregate
Withdrawals/

Distributions

 Aggregate
Balance
at Last
Fiscal
Year End
  Plan Name 

Executive

Contributions

in Last Fiscal

Year

 

Company

Contributions

in Last Fiscal

Year(a)

 

Aggregate

Earnings

in Last

Fiscal Year(b)

 

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

 

Aggregate

Balance

at Last

Fiscal

Year End

 

Christopher T. Forsythe(c)

 Account Balance Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  —     186,399   29,802   —     795,188  Account Balance Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  —     207,645   63,890   —     1,571,398 

David J. Park(c)

 Account Balance Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  —     177,670   21,224   —     597,231 

Karen E. Hartsfield(c)

 Account Balance Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  —     178,277   35,537   —     920,548 

John S. McDill(c)

 Account Balance Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  —     165,511   22,524   —     619,896 

J. Matt Robbins(c)

 Account Balance Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan  —     134,646   34,786   —     872,578 

 

(a)

Amounts reported in this column represent employer contributions under the Account Balance Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.SERP. These amounts are also reported in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation.

 

2023 Proxy Statement47


(b)

The amounts attributable to above-market interest on non-qualified deferred compensation in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column in the Summary Compensation Table and identified in footnote (d) to that table are also included in this column.

 

(c)

Upon attainment of age 55, Mr. Forsythe, Ms. Hartsfield, and Mr. ParkRobbins will be eligible for an immediate distribution of their ABAccount Balance SERP account balance. Mr. McDill is eligible for an immediate distribution of his Account Balance SERP account balance.

Change in Control Severance Agreements

We have entered into severance agreements with each of the named executive officers to provide certain severance benefits for them in the event of the terminationcertain terminations of their employment within three years following a “change in control” of the Company (as defined in the severance agreements and described generally below). In addition, each such named executive officer will be entitled to all rights and benefits, if any, provided under any other plan or agreement between himsuch named executive officer and the Company.

The severance agreement for each such named executive officer generally provides that the Company will pay such officer as severance pay in one lump sum an amount equal to (a) 2.5 times their total compensation (annual base salary and the higher of the last award under the Incentive Plan or the average of the three highest awards under such plan, whether or not consecutive) and (b) the total of (i) an amount that is actuarially equivalent to an additional three years of annual age and service credits payable to the officer under the PAP or the FACC (as applicable) and (ii) an amount that is actuarially equivalent to an additional three years of Company matching contributions payable to the officer under the RSP. The Company is also obligated to provide the officer with all medical, dental, vision and any other health benefits which qualify for continuation coverage under IRC Section 4980B (COBRA), for a period of 18 months following the date of termination. In addition, following the end of the18-month period, the Company is to pay such officer a lump sum amount equal to the present value of the cost to the Company of providing those benefits to him for an additional18-month period. Also, the Company must pay the officer a lump sum amount equal to the present value of the cost to the Company of providing accident and life insurance benefits as well as disability benefits (based on the benefits in effect for such officer at the time of the change in control) for a period of 36 months from their date of termination, equal to such benefits in effect for the officer at the time of the change in control.termination.

However, if an executive officer is terminated by the Company for “cause” (as defined in the severance agreement), or their employment is terminated bydue to retirement, death or disability, the Company is not obligated to pay such officer the lump sum severance payment.payment above. Further, if an executive officer voluntarily terminates their employment exceptother than for “constructive termination” (as defined in the severance agreement), the Company is not obligated to pay such officer the lump sum severance payment.payment above. The Company is not responsible for the payment of any excise taxgross-up payments which may be due on the payment of severance benefits to our named executive officers. However, if such lump sum severance benefit payments result in the imposition of excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the IRC, the officer will have the option to elect to have the payment reduced to a level that will result in no payment of such excise tax by such officer.officer or to have the Company pay the full severance payment amount, thereby leaving such officer responsible for personally paying any such excise tax penalties imposed.

50ATMOS ENERGY


For the purposes of these agreements, a “change in control” will generally be deemed to have occurred at any one of the following times:

 

on the date any person acquires ownership of common stock, that together with stock already held by such person, results in the person having beneficial ownership of 50% or more of the total fair market value or total voting power of our common stock;

 

on the date that a person acquires, or has acquired over a12-month period, ownership of our common stock possessing 30% or more of the total voting power of our stock;

 

on the date a majority of the members of our Board is replaced during any12-month period by directors whose election is not endorsed by a majority of the Board before the date of the election; or

 

48ATMOS ENERGY


on the date that a person acquires, or has acquired during the12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition, at least 40% of the total gross fair market value of our assets, as measured immediately before such acquisition, except if such sale is to a person or entity owning, directly or indirectly, at least 50% of the total value or voting power of our common stock before such acquisition.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Payments Made Upon Any Termination.    Regardless of the way a named executive officer’s employment is terminated, he or she is entitled to receive the following amounts earned during his or her term of employment, subject to the additional restrictions discussed below under “Payments Made Upon Termination for Cause.” Such amounts include:

 

amount of accrued but unpaid base salary;

 

amounts contributed under, or otherwise vested in our RSP; and

 

amounts accrued and vested through our PAP and SERP or Account Balance SERP.

Payments Made Upon Retirement.    In the event of the retirement of a named executive officer (only Mr. Cocklin, Mr. HaefnerAkers and Mr. AkersMcDill are eligible for retirement), in addition to the items identified above, such named executive officer will be entitled to receive:

 

a pro rata portion, at the end of the three-year performance period, of each outstanding grant of performance-based RSUs under our LTIP, at a value equal to the actual level of performance achieved during the period; and

 

upon the termination of the restricted period, shares of stock equal to the number of time-lapse RSUs granted under our LTIP or issued as a result of an election to convert all or a portion of an Incentive Plan payment.

Payments Made Upon Death or Disability.    In the event of the death or disability of a named executive officer, in addition to the benefits listed above under “Payments Made Upon Any Termination,” the named executive officer or designated beneficiary will be entitled to receive:

 

a pro rata portion, based on the number of months completed of such performance period, at the time of such termination, of each outstanding grant of performance-based RSUs under our LTIP, at a value equal to the target level of performance for the period;

 

shares of our common stock equal to the number of cumulative time-lapse RSUs granted under our LTIP or issued as a result of an election to convert all or a portion of an Incentive Plan payment; and

 

payments under the Company’s life insurance plan or benefits under the Company’s disability plan, as appropriate.

Payments Made Upon Voluntary Termination or Termination Without Cause.    In the event of a voluntary termination or termination without cause for Mr. Forsythe, Ms. Hartsfield, or Mr. ParkRobbins (except for a termination without cause due to a general reduction in force or the specific elimination of a named executive officer’s position, in which case the benefits would be substantially equivalent to those described under “Payments Made Upon Death orDisability”), no equity or retirement benefits would be payable to these named executive officers since they are not yet eligible for retirement.

2020 Proxy Statement51


Payments Made Upon Termination for Cause.    The benefits for a termination for cause are substantially equivalent to the benefits described above under “Payments Made Upon Any Termination,” except that for all the named executive officers, no benefit under the SERP or Account Balance SERP would be payable. In addition, all outstanding grants of time-lapse RSUs and performance-based RSUs, as well as any unvested FAC contributionsFACC under the RSP, would be forfeited by all named executive officers.

Payments Made Upon a Change in Control.    As discussed above in “Change in Control Severance Agreements,” beginning on page 50,48, we have entered into severance agreements with each of the named executive officers to provide certain severance benefits for them in the event of thea termination without “cause” or “constructive termination”

2023 Proxy Statement49


of their employment within three years following a “change in control” of the Company, as such terms are defined in the agreements. As is also discussed above, under the “best net” approach, the Company is not liable for the taxgross-up payments on behalf of those individuals whose severance payments would trigger excise tax penalties. In the tables below under the heading “Termination Upon/Following Change in Control,” we assume the named executive officers would receive the full amount of the severance benefits and pay any related excise tax penalties. The severance agreement for each such named executive officer provides that the Company will pay such named executive officer a lump sum severance payment as described in “Change in Control Severance Agreements,” beginning on page 50.48.

Potential Post-Employment Payment Tables.    The following tables reflect estimates of the total amount of compensation due each named executive officer in the event of such executive’s termination of employment by reason of death, disability, retirement, termination for cause, or termination of employment upon or following a change in control. There are no separate columns presented below showing amounts payable in the event of either a voluntary termination or a termination without cause since such amounts would be substantially equivalent to the amounts shown under Termination Upon Retirement. The amounts shown below assume that such termination was effective as of September 30, 2019,2022, and are estimates of the amounts which would be paid out to the executives upon such termination. The amounts shown below with respect to accelerated equity assume a value based on the closing price of our common stock of $101.85, as reported on the NYSE Consolidated Tape on September 30, 2022. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive’s separation from the Company.

 

Kim R. Cocklin

  

Termination
Upon
Death
($)

   

Termination
Upon
Disability
($)

   

Termination
Upon
Retirement
($)

   

Termination
For
Cause
($)

   

Termination
Upon/
Following
Change in
Control
($)

 

J. Kevin Akers

  

Termination

Upon

Death

($)

   

Termination

Upon

Disability

($)

   

Termination

Upon

Retirement

($)

   

Termination

For

Cause

($)

   

Termination

Upon/

Following

Change in

Control

($)

 

Cash Severance

   —      —      —      —      4,950,340    —      —      —      —      5,814,455 

Equity

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Time-Lapse Restricted Stock Units

   6,009,292    6,009,292    6,009,292    —      6,009,292    3,770,996    3,770,996    3,770,996    —      3,770,996 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

   1,541,349    1,541,349    1,541,349    —      1,541,349    1,407,873    1,407,873    1,407,873    —      1,407,873 

Total

   7,550,641    7,550,641    7,550,641    —      7,550,641    5,178,869    5,178,869    5,178,869    —      5,178,869 

Retirement Benefits

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Pension Account Plan

   342,753    396,417    342,753    342,753    430,400    735,187    869,852    735,187    735,187    837,559 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

   21,333,083    20,075,290    20,040,698    —      20,040,698    20,503,362    26,503,101    24,697,663    —      26,338,650 

Retirement Savings Plan

   996,186    996,186    996,186    996,186    1,027,774    1,857,137    1,857,137    1,857,137    1,857,137    1,894,100 

Total

   22,672,022    21,467,893    21,379,637    1,338,939    21,498,872    23,095,686    29,230,090    27,289,987    2,592,324    29,070,309 

Other Benefits

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Health & Welfare

   —      —      —      —      28,158    —      —      —      —      53,406 

Total

   30,222,663    29,018,534    28,930,278    1,338,939    34,028,011    28,274,555    34,408,959    32,468,856    2,592,324    40,117,039 

 

5250 ATMOS ENERGY 


Michael E. Haefner

  

Termination
Upon
Death
($)

   

Termination
Upon
Disability
($)

   

Termination
Upon
Retirement
($)

   

Termination
For
Cause
($)

   

Termination
Upon/
Following
Change in
Control
($)

 

Christopher T. Forsythe

  

Termination

Upon

Death

($)

   

Termination

Upon

Disability

($)

   

Termination

Upon

Retirement

($)

   

Termination

For

Cause

($)

   

Termination

Upon/

Following

Change in

Control

($)

 

Cash Severance

   —      —      —      —      5,573,640    —     —     —     —     2,416,988 

Equity

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Time-Lapse Restricted Stock Units

   4,350,142    4,350,142    4,350,142    —      4,350,142    1,161,090    1,161,090    —     —     1,161,090 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

   1,541,349    1,541,349    1,541,349    —      1,541,349    433,508    433,508    —     —     433,508 

Total

   5,891,491    5,891,491    5,891,491    —      5,891,491    1,594,598    1,594,598    —     —     1,594,598 

Retirement Benefits

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Pension Account Plan

   247,601    510,072    247,601    247,601    317,480    346,300    566,703    346,300    346,300    427,880 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

   24,470,976    23,887,696    22,369,474    —      24,075,998 

Account Balance SERP

   1,571,398    1,571,398    —     —     1,571,398 

Retirement Savings Plan

   976,430    976,430    976,430    976,430    1,008,018    1,102,572    1,102,572    1,102,572    1,102,572    1,139,535 

Total

   25,695,007    25,374,198    23,593,505    1,224,031    25,401,496    3,020,270    3,240,673    1,448,872    1,448,872    3,138,813 

Other Benefits

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Health & Welfare

   —      —      —      —      28,879    —     —     —     —     33,531 

Total

   31,586,498    31,265,689    29,484,996    1,224,031    36,895,506    4,614,868    4,835,271    1,448,872    1,448,872    7,183,930 

 

J. Kevin Akers

  

Termination
Upon
Death
($)

   

Termination
Upon
Disability
($)

   

Termination
Upon
Retirement
($)

   

Termination
For
Cause
($)

   

Termination
Upon/
Following
Change in
Control
($)

 

Karen E. Hartsfield

  Termination
Upon
Death
($)
   Termination
Upon
Disability
($)
   Termination
Upon
Retirement*
($)
   Termination
For
Cause
($)
   Termination
Upon/
Following
Change in
Control
($)
 

Cash Severance

   —      —      —      —      2,191,583    —     —     —     —     2,065,178 

Equity

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Time-Lapse Restricted Stock Units

   1,079,108    1,079,108    1,079,108    —      1,079,108    848,411    848,411    —     —     848,411 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

   390,605    390,605    390,605    —      390,605    316,720    316,720    —     —     316,720 

Total

   1,469,713    1,469,713    1,469,713    —      1,469,713    1,165,131    1,165,131    —     —     1,165,131 

Retirement Benefits

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Pension Account Plan

   552,973    1,090,220    552,973    552,973    640,620    —     —     —     —     —  

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

   14,255,957    13,080,381    11,018,876    —      13,680,830 

Account Balance SERP

   920,548    920,548    —     —     920,548 

Retirement Savings Plan

   1,746,998    1,746,998    1,746,998    1,746,998    1,778,586    321,527    321,527    321,527    321,527    395,453 

Total

   16,555,928    15,917,599    13,318,847    2,299,971    16,100,036      1,242,075      1,242,075       321,527       321,527      1,316,001 

Other Benefits

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Health & Welfare

   —      —      —      —      40,145    —     —     —     —     45,640 

Total

   18,025,641    17,387,312    14,788,560    2,299,971    19,801,477    2,407,206    2,407,206    321,527    321,527    4,591,950 

 

 20202023 Proxy Statement 5351


Christopher T. Forsythe

  

Termination
Upon
Death
($)

   

Termination
Upon
Disability
($)

   

Termination
Upon
Retirement
($)

   

Termination
For
Cause
($)

   

Termination
Upon/
Following
Change in
Control
($)

 

John S. McDill

  

Termination

Upon

Death

($)

   

Termination

Upon

Disability

($)

   

Termination

Upon

Retirement

($)

   

Termination

For

Cause

($)

   

Termination

Upon/

Following

Change in

Control

($)

 

Cash Severance

   —      —      —      —      2,066,695    —     —     —     —     1,994,775 

Equity

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Time-Lapse Restricted Stock Units

   1,079,108    1,079,108    —      —      1,079,108    550,499    550,499    —     —     550,499 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

   390,605    390,605    —      —      390,605    201,357    201,357    —     —     201,357 

Total

   1,469,713    1,469,713    —      —      1,469,713    751,856    751,856    —     —     751,856 

Retirement Benefits

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Pension Account Plan

   237,069    849,877    237,069    237,069    301,516    556,066    724,130    556,066    556,066    670,949 

Account Balance SERP

   795,188    795,188    —      —      795,188    619,896    619,896    619,896   —     619,896 

Retirement Savings Plan

   899,117    899,117    899,117    899,117    930,705    731,879    731,879    731,879    731,879    768,842 

Total

   1,931,374    2,544,182    1,136,186    1,136,186    2,027,409    1,907,841    2,075,905    1,907,841    1,287,945    2,059,687 

Other Benefits

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Health & Welfare

   —      —      —      —      25,843    —     —     —     —     38,856 

Total

   3,401,087    4,013,895    1,136,186    1,136,186    5,589,660    2,659,697    2,827,761    1,907,841    1,287,945    4,845,174 

 

David J. Park

  

Termination
Upon
Death
($)

   

Termination
Upon
Disability
($)

   

Termination
Upon
Retirement
($)

   

Termination
For
Cause
($)

   

Termination
Upon/
Following
Change in
Control
($)

 

Cash Severance

   —      —      —      —      1,886,810 

Equity

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Time-Lapse Restricted Stock Units

   1,179,445    1,179,445    —      —      1,179,445 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

   349,339    349,339    —      —      349,339 

Total

   1,528,784    1,528,784    —      —      1,528,784 

Retirement Benefits

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Pension Account Plan

   217,455    861,918    217,455    217,455    287,334 

Account Balance SERP

   597,231    597,231    —      —      597,231 

Retirement Savings Plan

   876,289    876,289    876,289    876,289    907,877 

Total

   1,690,975    2,335,438    1,093,744    1,093,744    1,792,442 

Other Benefits

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Health & Welfare

   —      —      —      —      40,145 

Total

   3,219,759    3,864,222    1,093,744    1,093,744    5,248,181 

54ATMOS ENERGY


J. Matt Robbins

  Termination
Upon
Death
($)
   Termination
Upon
Disability
($)
   Termination
Upon
Retirement
($)
   Termination
For
Cause
($)
   Termination
Upon/
Following
Change in
Control
($)
 

Cash Severance

   —     —     —     —     1,558,610 

Equity

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Time-Lapse Restricted Stock Units

   848,411    848,411    —     —     848,411 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

   316,720    316,720    —     —     316,720 

Total

   1,165,131    1,165,131    —     —     1,165,131 

Retirement Benefits

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Pension Account Plan

   —     —     —     —     —  

Account Balance SERP

   872,578    872,578    —     —     872,578 

Retirement Savings Plan

   429,827    429,827    429,827    429,827    503,753 

Total

   1,302,405    1,302,405    429,827    429,827    1,376,331 

Other Benefits

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Health & Welfare

   —     —     —     —     30,846 

Total

   2,467,536    2,467,536    429,827    429,827    4,130,918 

In the tables above, we have shown the severance compensation and employee benefits to be provided in the aggregate to each named executive officer in the event of each of the termination scenarios. In each scenario, there are differences in how equity, retirement, and health and welfare benefits are determined. The discussion below provides more specific information on the retirement benefits under each of the various scenarios as well as the health and welfare benefits payable only in the event of a termination of a named executive officer pursuant tofollowing a change in control.

52ATMOS ENERGY


Termination Upon Death.    The SERP benefit is the sum of the following:

 

two times final average earnings (base salary plus annual payment under the Incentive Plan) less the amount paid through the Company’s group life insurance plan;

 

a life annuity benefit of 50% of final average earnings (base salary plus annual payment under the Incentive Plan) payable to the surviving spouse; and

 

a temporary life annuity benefit of 25% of final average earnings (base salary plus annual payment under the Incentive Plan) payable to dependent children until children reach the age of 18 years.

In addition, the following benefits are payable at a termination upon death:

 

the Account Balance SERP plan benefit is equal to the account balance at the time of death;

 

the PAP plan benefit is equal to the account balance at the time of death; and

 

the RSP plan benefit is equal to the account balance at the time of death.

Termination Upon Disability.    The SERP benefit is the sum of the following:

 

a monthly benefit based on 60% of compensation (base salary plus annual payment under the Incentive Plan) less the amount paid from the Company’s group disability plan, with the net benefit payable as a temporary benefit until the age of 65 years; and

 

 

regular retirement benefit, as described below in “Termination Upon Retirement,” payable at the age of 65 years.

In addition, the following benefits are payable at a termination upon disability:

 

the Account Balance SERP plan benefit is equal to the account balance at the time of disability;

 

the PAP plan benefit is equal to the value of the projected age 65 monthly benefit assuming level future earnings from date of disability; and

 

the RSP plan benefit equal to the account balance at the time of disability.

Termination Upon Retirement.    At September 30, 2019,2022, only Mr. Cocklin, Mr. HaefnerAkers and Mr. AkersMcDill were eligible for retirement. The SERP benefit at retirement is the lump sum benefit based on a target benefit of 60% of final average earnings (base salary plus annual payment under the Incentive Plan) less an offset for the benefits to be paid from thetax-qualified PAP which would be reduced if retirement were to occur prior to age 62 or if the service period at the Company were less than ten years. In addition, the following benefits are payable at retirement:

 

the PAP plan benefit is equal to the account balance at the time of retirement; and

 

the RSP plan benefit is equal to the account balance at the time of retirement.

Termination Upon Change in Control.    The SERP benefit upon termination pursuant tofollowing a change in control is equal to the same retirement benefits described above with respect to “Termination Upon Retirement,” with the following additional provisions:

 

there is no reduction applied to the earned benefit in the event that the named executive officer has less than 10 years of service;

 

there is no reduction applied to the earned benefit for early commencement prior to age 62; and

 

the named executive officer is immediately vested in the accrued benefit.

2020 Proxy Statement55


In addition, the following benefits are payable upon termination pursuant tofollowing a change in control:

 

the Account Balance SERP plan benefit is equal to the account balance at the time of termination pursuant to a change in control;

 

the PAP benefit includes the accrued benefit at the time of termination plus an additional three years of earned compensation credits; and

 

the RSP benefit includes the accrued benefit at the time of termination plus an additional three years of Company matching contributions.contributions and three years of service credits for the FACC, if applicable.

2023 Proxy Statement53


Health and Welfare Benefits.    The Company provides supplemental benefits in the form of health and welfare benefits only in the event of the termination of a named executive officer pursuant tofollowing a change in control. The supplemental health and welfare benefits reported in the“Potential Post-Employment Payment Tables” above, beginning on page 52,50, represent the following benefits: (i) all medical, dental, vision and any other health benefits which qualify for continuation coverage under IRC Section 4980BCOBRA for a period of 18 months from the date of termination; (ii) payment of a lump sum equal to the present value of the cost to the Company of providing those benefits for an additional18-month period; and (iii) payment of a lump sum equal to the present value of the cost to the Company of providing accident and life insurance benefits as well as disability benefits for a period of 36 months from their date of termination, equal to such benefits in effect for the officer at the time of the change in control.

 

5654 ATMOS ENERGY 


OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION MATTERS

Human Resources Committee Report

The HR Committee has the responsibility for reviewing and recommending to the full Board, the Company’s executive compensation program. The HR Committee is composed entirely of persons who qualify as independent directors under the listing standards of the NYSE. In this context, the HR Committee has met, reviewed and discussed with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” contained in this proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, the committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this proxy statement.

Respectfully submitted by the members of the Human Resources Committee:

NancyRichard K. Quinn,Gordon, Chair

John C. Ale

Kelly H. Compton

Richard K. Gordon

Richard A. Sampson

Diana J. Walters

Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation    

None of the HR Committee members were, during fiscal 2019 or previously, an officer or employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries. In addition, there was no interlocking relationship between any named executive officer of the Company and any other corporation during fiscal 2019.

Compensation Risk Assessment

The HR Committee reviews our compensation programs to ensure that they do not encourage unnecessary risk taking and instead encourage behaviors that support sustainable value creation. In 2019,2022, the HR Committee, with the assistance of Meridian, reviewed the Company’s compensation programs for employees, including the named executive officers. The HR Committee believes the following factors reduce the likelihood of excessive risk-taking:

 

  

The Company’s compensation programs are heavily weighted to long-term incentive awards, which are tied to shareholder value and have extended overlapping vesting periods (3 years) which allow for long-term ownership;

 

  

The HR Committee reviews and approves goals at the beginning of each cycle;

 

  

Total compensation features an effective balance of short- and long-term compensation components;

 

  

The HR Committee has downward discretion in the annual incentive plan;

 

  

Annual and long-term performance plan payments are capped at 200%;

 

  

The Company’s change in control severance benefits fall within common norms and do not provide excessive incentive to seek a transaction;

 

  

The Company has a robust clawback policy that applies to both the annual and long-term incentive awards; and

 

  

The Company’s ownership guidelines, annual stock awards, and extended vesting provisions create sustained and consistent ownership stakes.

Accordingly, the HR Committee has determined that none of the Company’s incentive compensation plans encourage our executive officers or other employees to take excessive risks and that the risks arising from these plans are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

2020 Proxy Statement57


Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio

Our chief executive officer (“CEO”) to median employee pay ratio is calculated in accordance with SEC rules and requirements. The annual total compensation of our Past President and Chief Executive Officer, as reported in the

2023 Proxy Statement55


Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 20192022 was $10,395,993.$4,839,562. The annual total compensation of our median employee (the “Median Employee”), following the same methodology used in computing the annual total compensation of our CEO, was $84,516.$81,388. The ratio of the annual total compensation of our Past President and Chief Executive Officer to the annual total compensation of our Median Employee was 12359 to 1.

 

  
CEO Pay Ratio    

 

 

Median employee total compensation

  $84,51681,388
 

CEO total compensation

  $10,395,9934,839,562
 

Ratio of CEO to Median employee compensation

  123:59:1

As permitted by SEC rules,In determining the annual total compensation of our Median Employee, we used the same Median Employee for 2019 as we identified for 2018 because there have been no significant changes to our workforce or pay design for 2019 that we believe would significantly change our CEO pay ratio results. The following briefly describes the process we used to identify our Median Employee for 2018, based on our employee population as of July 1, 2018:methodology:

 

We selected July 1, 20182022 as the determination date used to reflect our Company’s employee population during fiscal 2018,2022, which date is within three months of the end of fiscal 20182022 on September 30, 2018.2022.

 

To identify the Median Employee as of July 1, 2018,2022, we utilized the total compensation (base salary, overtime/shift pay and all incentive compensation earned) of all our employees, excluding our CEO, as of that date for the 12 month12-month period, from July 20172021 through June 2018,2022, as a consistently applied compensation measure, with the following refinements:

 

We annualized the compensation of any individuals who were employed for less than the full12-month period.

 

We did not include the value of any annual equity awards in determining the Median Employee.

We did not make any cost of living adjustments because all our employees are located in the United States.

SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. As a result, the pay ratio reported by the Company may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies.

 

5856 ATMOS ENERGY 


BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table lists the beneficial ownership with respect to each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities as of December 13, 2019:12, 2022:

 

 

Title of Class

 

 

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

    

 

Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial Ownership

    

 

Percent (%)
of Class(a)

  

 

Common stock

 

 

BlackRock, Inc.(b)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

    13,525,109    11.06 

 

Common stock

 

 

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(c)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

    12,364,124    10.11 

 

Title of Class

 

 

Name and Address

of Beneficial Owner

    

 

Amount and

Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

    

 

Percent (%)

       of Class(a)       

 

Common stock

 

 

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(b)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

    16,414,964    11.6%

 

Common stock

 

 

BlackRock, Inc.(c)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

    13,905,648    9.9%

 

Common stock

 

 

State Street Corporation (d)

State Street Financial Center

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

    10,257,605    7.3%

 

(a)

The percent of voting securities is based on the number of outstanding shares of our common stock as of December 13, 2019.12, 2022.

 

(b)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A dated January 30, 2019, in which BlackRock, Inc. reported that as of December 31, 2018, it had sole voting power over 12,479,183 shares and sole dispositive power over 13,525,109 shares.

(c)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A13G dated February 11, 2019,9, 2022, in which The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) reported that as of December 31, 2018,2021, it had shared voting power over 263,193 shares, sole dispositive power over 15,815,953 shares, and shared dispositive power over 599,011 shares.

(c)

Based on a Schedule 13G dated January 26, 2022, in which BlackRock, Inc. reported that as of December 31, 2021, it had sole voting power over 97,91111,925,273 shares and sole dispositive power over 13,905,648 shares.

(d)

Based on a Schedule 13G dated February 14, 2022, in which State Street Corporation reported that as of December 31, 2021, it had shared voting power over 54,608 shares, sole dispositive power over 12,238,7129,484,566 shares and shared dispositive power over 125,41210,245,091 shares. Based on the Schedule 13G/A, (i) Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of 43,090 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts, and (ii) Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of 137,143 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.

 

 20202023 Proxy Statement 5957


Security Ownership of ManagementDirectors, Nominees, and DirectorsExecutive Officers

The following table lists the beneficial ownership of our common stock, the only class of securities issued and outstanding, with respect to all our directors and nominees for director, our named executive officers, and all our directors and executive officers as a group as of December 13, 2019.12, 2022. Except as otherwise noted, the directors, nominees and executive officers, individually or as a group, have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

 

Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership(#)(a)

 

 

 

Percent (%) of
Class(b)

 

  

 

Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership(#)(a)

 

 

 

  Percent (%) of  

Class(b)

 

J. Kevin Akers

  44,854(c)   64,833(c) 

Robert W. Best

  645,712(d) 

John C. Ale

  1,012(d) 

Kim R. Cocklin

  443,065(c)   241,346(d) 

Kelly H. Compton

  7,863(d)   11,569(d) 

Sean Donohue

  2,561(d)   5,867(d) 

Christopher T. Forsythe

  25,624(c)   40,259(c) 

Rafael G. Garza

  11,136(d)   16,540(d) 

Richard K. Gordon

  66,801(d)   75,686(d) 

Robert C. Grable

  40,802(d) 

Michael E. Haefner

  128,151(c) 

Karen E. Hartsfield

  4,823(c)   17,551(c) 

John S. McDill

  24,213(c) 

Nancy K. Quinn

  56,335(d)   65,662(d) 

David J. Park

  12,622(c) 

J. Matt Robbins

  8,742(c)   16,036(c) 

Richard A. Sampson

  24,567(d)   35,801(d) 

Stephen R. Springer

  48,232(d) 

Diana J. Walters

  2,561(d)   5,879(d) 

Richard Ware II

  86,837(d) 

Frank Yoho

  7,154(d) 

All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (18 individuals) (b)(c)(d)

  1,661,288   1.36 

All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (15 individuals) (b)(c)(d)

  629,408  0.5%

 

(a)

These shares of our common stock are owned directly by each listed person, including shares held in our RSP, and by members of his or her household and are held individually, jointly or pursuant to a trust agreement, an IRA or other type of arrangement.

 

(b)

The percentage of shares beneficially owned by any individual does not exceed 1% of the class so owned.

 

(c)

Does not include unvested time-lapse restricted stock units in the following respective amounts: Mr. Cocklin, 51,014Akers, 37,025 units; Mr. Haefner, 38,196 units; Mr. Akers, 9,475 units, Mr. Forsythe, 9,475 units; Mr. Park, 9,91311,400 units; Ms. Hartsfield, 8,9028,330 units; Mr. McDill, 5,405 units; and Mr. Robbins, 8,4108,330 units.

 

(d)

Includes cumulative number of share units, with no voting rights, credited to the following directors under our Directors Plan and LTIP in the following respective amounts: Mr. Best, 21,536Ale, 1,012 units; Ms. Compton, 7,8638,471 units; Mr. Donohue, 2,5615,849 units; Mr. Garza, 11,13616,540 units; Mr. Gordon, 56,801 units; Mr. Grable, 33,22865,686 units; Ms. Quinn, 56,33565,662 units; Mr. Sampson, 21,56726,938 units; Mr. Springer, 47,232 units, Ms. Walters, 2,561 units4,227 units; and Mr. Ware, 69,038Yoho, 4,154 units. Does not include unvested time-lapse restricted stock units in the following respective amounts: Mr. Cocklin, 12,897 units; Ms. Compton, 1,322 units; and Ms. Walters, 1,322 units.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors, and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

 

6058 ATMOS ENERGY 


To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors, and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with, except for the following: a Form 3 reporting the initial ownership as of October 1, 2021 of John S. McDill, a new executive officer who was appointed effective as of the same date, was filed late on October 18, 2021, due to a delay in receiving filing codes due to the SEC’s EDGAR system being unavailable.

2023 Proxy Statement59


INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING

Date, Time, and Location

Our 20202023 annual meeting of shareholders will be held virtually by means of a webcast on Wednesday, February 5, 2020,8, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. Central Standard Time at the Westin Galleria Dallas, 13340 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, TX 75240.Time. There will be no physical meeting location.

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

To reduce costs and conserve resources, we send the majority of our shareholders a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (“Meeting Notice”) in lieu of a paper copy of our proxy materials. The Meeting Notice contains instructions to:

 

Electronically access our proxy statement and our 20192022 Annual Report to Shareholders and Form10-K;

 

Vote via the internet, by telephone, or by mail; and

 

Receive a paper copy of our proxy materials by mail, if desired.

AdmissionAccess to the Webcast

All shareholders are invitedAccess to attend the annual meeting. To be admitted, youwebcast will need acceptable photo identification and proof of your share ownership as follows:

Shareholders of Record.    Shareholders of record (i.e., shares are registered in the shareholder’s name with the Company’s transfer agent), may establish share ownership by presenting a copy of their Meeting Notice.

Beneficial Shareholders.    Beneficial shareholders (i.e., shares held through a broker, bank or other holder of record) may establish their share ownership by providing either their Meeting Notice or a copy of their brokerage or other account statement.

If you require special accommodation due to a disability, please contact our Corporate Secretaryopen approximately fifteen minutes prior to the start of the annual meeting to indicateallow time for you to log in and test your computer audio system. We encourage you to access the accommodationsmeeting prior to the start time.

To attend and participate in the annual meeting, log in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ATO2023. You will need your unique control number included on your proxy card (printed in the box and marked by the arrow) or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

Technicians will be available to assist you with any technical difficulties you may experience when trying to access the virtual meeting. If you experience any such difficulties, please call the support number posted on the virtual shareholder meeting login page at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ATO2023.

Questions

If you have a question pertaining to the business of the Annual Meeting, you must submit it in advance of the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ATO2023. Questions may be submitted until 6:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 2, 2023. You should have your proxy card or voting instruction form in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions. Each shareholder will need. You may do so in writingbe limited to Corporate Secretary, Atmos Energy Corporation, 1800 Three Lincoln Centre, 5430 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75240.no more than one question. Questions pertinent to the business of the Annual Meeting will be read aloud and answered, subject to time constraints, after the end of the business portion of the Annual Meeting.

Voting Matters

Proxy Information.    On or about December 20, 2019,16, 2022, we began distributing to each shareholder entitled to vote at the annual meeting either (i) the Meeting Notice or (ii) this proxy statement, a proxy card, and our 20192022 Annual Report. Shares represented by a properly executed and timely received proxy will be voted in accordance with instructions provided by the shareholder. If a properly executed and timely received proxy contains no specific voting instructions, the shares represented by any such proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. Proxies are solicited by the Board.

Shareholders Entitled to Vote.    Shareholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on the record date of December 13, 2019,12, 2022, are eligible to vote on the internet, by telephone, by mail, or at the virtual annual shareholder meeting.meeting using the unique control number assigned to him or her. On that date, 122,259,296141,015,974 shares of common stock were outstanding. Each share of common stock entitles the holder to one vote on the items of business to be considered at the annual meeting.

60ATMOS ENERGY


Vote Required for Items of Business.    The presence, in person or by proxy, of holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock is required to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. Abstentions and brokernon-votes (explained below) are counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Under Texas and Virginia law and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, if a quorum is present at the meeting:

 

 

Item 1Proposal One—nominees for election as directors will be elected to the Board if the holders of a majority of the votesshares of our common stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting cast arevotes “for” each such nominee;

 

2020 Proxy Statement61


 

Item 2Proposal Two—ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20202023 will be approved if the holders of a majority of the votesshares of our common stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting cast arevotes “for” the proposal; and

 

 

Item 3Proposal Three—the advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers(“Say-on-Pay”) disclosed in the proxy statement will be approved if a majority of the votesshares of our common stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting cast arevotes “for” the proposal.proposal; and

Abstentions and BrokerNon-Votes.Abstentions    For Proposals One, Two, and Three, abstentions will have the same effect as an against vote.vote for each proposal at the meeting. Brokernon-votes and failure to cast a vote are not considered votes castentitled to vote and will therefore have no effect on the voting outcome of any item of business at the meeting. A brokernon-vote occurs on an item of business when a registered shareholder does not vote its client’s shares on the item but votes on another matter presented at the meeting. This typically occurs when the registered shareholder (usually a broker or bank) has either voting instructions from its client or discretionary voting authorityshare custodian is unable to vote on a proposal because the proposal is considered “non-routine” under NYSE rules and the beneficial owner of the shares does not provide voting instructions with respect to vote on one item of business and not on other items.that proposal.

Brokers and other share custodians do not have discretion to vote onnon-routine matters unless the beneficial owner of the shares has given explicit voting instructions. Consequently, if you do not give your broker or share custodian explicit voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on the election of directors or the advisory vote on executive compensation and your shares will instead be considered brokernon-votes on each such item. The ratification of the selection of E&Y as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20202023 is considered a routine matter and, as such, your broker or share custodian of record is entitled to vote your shares on such proposal in its discretion if you do not provide voting instructions on that item.

Revocation of Proxies.    Shareholders who execute proxies retain the right to revoke them at any time before the shares are voted by proxy at the meeting. A shareholder may revoke a proxy by delivering a signed statement to our Corporate Secretary at or prior to the annual meeting or by timely executing and delivering, by internet, telephone, or mail, or in person at the annual meeting, another proxy dated as of a later date.

Proxy Solicitation

All expenses of soliciting proxies will be paid by the Company. Proxies may be solicited personally, or by telephone, mail, email or the internet, by employees or directors of the Company, but the Company will not pay any compensation for such solicitations. The Company expects to pay fees of approximately $7,500$8,000 for assistance by Morrow Sodali LLC, 470 West Ave.,333 Ludlow Street, Stamford, CT 06902, in the solicitation of proxies. In addition, the Company will reimburse brokers, banks and other persons holding shares as nominees for their expenses related to sending material to their principals and obtaining their proxies.

Shareholder Proposals

In the event a shareholder intends to present a proposal at our annual meeting of shareholders on February 5, 2020,8, 2023, in accordance with the Company’s bylaws, the shareholder must be a shareholder of record on the record date, December 13, 2019,12, 2022, who shall continue to be entitled to vote at the annual meeting. In addition, such shareholder must mail a notice of such proposal so that it is received by the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices by January 14, 2020,10, 2023, the 25th day following the day on which notice of the meeting is to be sent, December 20, 2019.16, 2022. In the event a shareholder intends to present a proposal at our annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2024, such shareholder must mail a notice of such proposal so that it is received by the Corporate Secretary at our principal

2023 Proxy Statement61


executive offices not less than 60 days nor more than 85 days prior to the 2024 annual meeting; provided that if less than 75 days’ prior public disclosure of the date of the 2024 annual meeting is provided, such notice shall be provided no later than the close of business on the 25th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the 2024 annual meeting is sent. Any such proposal must also include the information required by the Company’s bylaws. In addition to satisfying the deadlines in the advance notice provisions of our bylaws as set forth above, a shareholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of nominees submitted under the advance notice provisions in our bylaws for our 2024 annual meeting must provide the notice required under Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act to the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than December 10, 2023. In addition, in the event a shareholder intends to present a proposal at our 20212024 annual meeting of shareholders, if such proposal is to be included in our proxy statement relating to such meeting, it must be received by the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than August  22, 2020,18, 2023, and it must be prepared according to applicable law, as determined by the Company.

Annual Report

You may obtain a copy of our 20192022 Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019,2022, including the financial statements and the financial statement schedules included therein,notes thereto, free of charge on our website or by contacting us as noted below. In addition, the exhibits of the Annual Report on Form10-K are available upon payment of charges that approximate our cost of reproduction. If you would like to receive a copy of these exhibits, or our 20192022 Annual Report, please visit

62ATMOS ENERGY


our website atwww.atmosenergy.com, call Investor Relations at972-855-3792 or mail your written request to Investor Relations, Atmos Energy Corporation, 1800 Three Lincoln Centre, 5430 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75240.

Other Business

In the event that any matter not described herein is properly presented for a shareholder vote at the annual meeting, or any adjournment thereof, the persons named in the form of proxy will vote in accordance with their best judgment. At the time this proxy statement went to press, the Company knew of no other matters that might be presented for shareholder action at the annual meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

LOGO

Karen E. Hartsfield

Senior Vice President, General Counsel

and Corporate Secretary

Dallas, Texas

December 20, 2019

16, 2022

 

We encourage you to receive all proxy materials in the future electronically to help us save on printing costs and postage fees, as well as to conserve natural resources in producing and distributing these materials. If you wish to receive these materials electronically for next year’s annual meeting, please follow the instructions on the proxy card.

 

2020 Proxy Statement63



APPENDIX A

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO GAAP

The enactment of the TCJA required us to remeasure our deferred tax assets and liabilities at our new federal statutory income tax rate as of December 22, 2017. The remeasurement of our net deferred tax liabilities resulted in the recognition of a non-cash income tax benefit of $158.8 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018. Due to the non-recurring nature of this benefit, we believe that net income and diluted net income per share before the non-cash income tax benefit provide a more relevant measure to analyze our financial performance than net income and diluted net income per share in order to allow investors to better analyze our core results and allow the information to be presented on a comparative basis to the prior year. Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share, non-GAAP measures, are calculated as follows:

   

For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30

 
   

2019

   

2018

   

Change

 
   (In thousands, except per share data) 

Net income

  $511,406   $603,064   $(91,658

TCJA non-cash income tax benefit

   —      (158,782   158,782 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted net income

  $511,406   $444,282   $67,124 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
      

Diluted net income per share

  $4.35   $5.43   $(1.08

Diluted EPS from TCJA non-cash income tax benefit

   —      (1.43   1.43 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted diluted net income per share

  $4.35   $4.00   $0.35 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 


62 2020 Proxy StatementATMOS ENERGY A-1


LOGO


LOGOLOGO

 

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION

C/O AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER0 BROADRIDGE CORPORATE ISSUER SOLUTIONS, INC.

6201 15TH AVENUE

BROOKLYN,P.O. BOX 1342

BRENTWOOD, NY 1121911717

 

LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting -Go towww.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote byinformation up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 4, 20207, 2023 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 30, 2020February 3, 2023 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

 

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALSDuring The Meeting -Go towww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ATO2023

If you would like to reduce

You may attend the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and integrated annual reports electronicallymeeting via email or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and when prompted, indicatevote during the meeting. Have the information that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronicallyis printed in future years. You may also request electronic delivery of proxy materials on our website atwww.atmosenergy.com.the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote byinstructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on February 4, 20207, 2023 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 30, 2020February 3, 2023 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E87410-P30110-Z75855D93769-P81753                    KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

 

— — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

 

 

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

 

 

 

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION

         
  

 

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR

          
  FOR the following listed nominees:          
  

 

1.  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

      
  

 

Nominees:

    For    

Against

Abstain

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR proposals 2-3.

  

 

For

 

 

Against

 

 

Abstain

1a.     John C. Ale

2.    

Proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2023.

1b.     J. Kevin Akers

1c.     Kim R. Cocklin

1d.     Kelly H. Compton

3.    

Proposal for an advisory vote by shareholders to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for fiscal 2022 (“Say-on-Pay”).

1e.     Sean Donohue

1f.      Rafael G. Garza

        
  

 

1a.     J. Kevin Akers1g.     Richard K. Gordon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1b.     Robert W. Best

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FORproposals 2-3.

ForAgainstAbstain

1c.     Kim R. Cocklin

2.    Proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2020.

1d.     Kelly H. Compton

1e.     Sean Donohue

1f.      Rafael G. Garza

3.    Proposal for an advisory vote by shareholders to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers for fiscal 2019 (“Say-on-Pay”).

1g.     Richard K. Gordon

  
  

 

1h.     Robert C. GrableNancy K. Quinn

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        
  

 

1i.      Nancy K. QuinnRichard A. Sampson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        
  

 

1j.      Richard A. SampsonDiana J. Walters

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        
  

 

1k.      Stephen R. SpringerFrank Yoho

1l.      Diana J. Walters

For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated

1m.    Richard Ware II

      
 

 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

     
     
  

       

               
  

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

 

 

Date

 

     

Signature (Joint Owners)

 

 

Date

 

     


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and our Annual Report, including our Form 10-K, are available at

www.proxyvote.com.

Please date, sign and mail your proxy card back as soon as possible!

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION

February 5, 20208, 2023

-Please Detach and Mail in Envelope Provided-

 

— — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

E87411-P30110-Z75855D93770-P81753  

 

 

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION

PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

FEBRUARY 5, 20208, 2023

The undersigned hereby appoints Richard K. GordonKaren E. Hartsfield and RichardAshley A. Sampson,Burton, or either of them, each with full power of substitution, to represent the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Atmos Energy Corporation to be held virtually at 9:00 a.m. Central Standard Time on February 5, 2020, at the Westin Galleria Dallas, 13340 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, TX 75240,8, 2023, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, and to vote the number of shares the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the meeting on the matters listed on the reverse side.

THISPROXYISSOLICITEDONBEHALFOFTHEBOARDOFDIRECTORSOFATMOSENERGYCORPORATION.THISPROXYWILLBEVOTEDASDIRECTED.THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. INTHEABSENCEOF THE ABSENCE OF DIRECTION,,THISPROXYWILLBEVOTEDFORTHENOMINEESFORELECTIONTOTHEBOARDANDFORPROPOSALS THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD AND FOR PROPOSALS 2AND3.In THROUGH 3. In their discretion, theirdiscretion,theproxyholdersareauthorizedtovoteuponsuchotherbusinessasmayproperlycomebeforethe proxy holders are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting,,andatanyadjournment and at any adjournment or postponementpostponement thereof, to thereof,totheextentauthorizedbyRule14a-4(c)promulgatedbytheSecuritiesandExchange extent authorized by Rule 14a-4(c) promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission,,andbyapplicablestate and by applicable state laws(includingmattersthattheproxyholdersdonotknow, (including matters that the proxy holders do not know, areasonabletimebeforethis reasonable time before this solicitation,,aretobepresented) are to be presented).

RetiRetirement Savings Plan Participants.rementSavingsPlanParticipants.This card also constitutes voting instructions by the undersigned participant to the trustee of the Atmos Energy Corporation Retirement Savings Plan and Trust (“Plan”) for all shares votable by the undersigned Plan participant. The undersigned on the reverse side of this card authorizes and instructs the Atmos Energy Corporation Qualified Retirement Plans and Trusts Committee, as trustee of the Plan (“Trustee”), to vote all shares of the common stock of Atmos Energy Corporation allocated to the undersigned’s account under the Plan (as shown on the reverse side) at the 20202023 annual meeting of shareholders, or at any adjournment thereof, in accordance with the instructions on the reverse side. The Trustee will vote these shares as directed, provided your voting instructions are received over the Internet, by telephone or through the mail on your proxy card by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on January 30, 2020.February 3, 2023. All shares of Atmos Energy common stock for which the Trustee has not received timely instructions shall be voted or exercised by the Trustee in its best judgment. All voting instructions for shares held in the Plan shall be confidential. State Street Global Advisors Trust Company (“State Street”) is the independent fiduciary for purposes of ensuring the confidentiality of the Plan participant voting process. Please notify State Street, in writing, if you have specific confidentiality concerns relating to exercising your right to direct the Trustee to: Sydney Marzeotti, Vice President, State Street Global Advisors Trust Company, 1 Iron Street, Boston, MA 02210.

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON,VIRTUALLY YOU ARE URGED TO COMPLETE THIS PROXY BY MAIL BY DATING, SIGNING AND PROMPTLY MAILING THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE SO THAT THE SHARES MAY BE REPRESENTED AT THE MEETING.

Address Changes/Comments:

(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)

Continued and to be signed on reverse side